Incompatibility Between WCETT Route Metric and Flooding Control of AODV in Wireless Mesh Networks

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 225)


The Weighted Cumulative Expected Transmission Time (WCETT) metric can be incorporated into a routing protocol such as On-Demand Distance Vector Routing (AODV) in wireless mesh network. The new route is called Multi-Radio Link-Quality Source Routing, which is allowed to trade off channel diversity and path length by changing the value of the control parameter. But the incompatibility existed between WCETT and flooding technique in AODV. The original AODV cannot deal with the situation so that WCETT metric is not perfect to get the real link quality. We analyze the reason and the relevant solution is present. After experimental and theoretical analysis, the new route shows good performance than the old one.


WCETT AODV Incompatibility Wireless mesh network 



This material is based upon work supported by Project by Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Education Department (No: 10C0685, 10C0691, 11C0534), Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 10B034, No: 10JJ3067), and Hunan provincial innovation experiment program for university students (No: KDSC1005). We are grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments on this work.


  1. 1.
    Akyildiz IF, Xu-dong W, Wei-lin W (2005) Wireless mesh networks: a survey. Comput Netw J 47(4):445–487MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yang Y, Wang J, Kravets R (2006) Load-balanced routing for mesh networks. ACM Mob Comput Commun Rev 19(9):15–18Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cordeiro W, Aguiar E, Moreira W, Abelem A, Stanton M (2007) Providing quality of service for mesh networks using link delay measurements. In: 16th Ieee Icccn, vol 2(11), pp 991–996Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kyasanur P, Vaidya NH (2006) Routing and link-layer protocols for multi-channel multi-interface ad hoc wireless networks. Sigmobile Mob Comput Commun Rev 10(1):31–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Subramanian AP, Buddkihot MM, Miller S (2006) Interference aware routing in multi-radio wireless mesh networks. Workshop on wireless mesh networks vol 15(3), pp 55–63Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Perkins C, Belding-Royer E, Das S (2003). Ad hoc on-demand distance vector (AODV) routing. Ietf. Rfc 3561 ns2 (1998). vol 27(9), pp 13–18
  7. 7.
    Draves R, Padhye J, Zill B (2004). Routing in multi-radio, multi-hop wireless mesh networks. In: Proceedings of the 10th annual international conference on mobile computing and networking, vol 16(7). Philadelphia, pp 114–128Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Couto DSJD, Aguayo D, Bicket J, Morris R (2003). A high-throughput path metric for multi-hop wireless routing. In: 9th Mobi Com’03, ACM vol 15(5). New York, pp 134–146Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Koksal CE, Jamieson K, Telatar E, Thiran P (2006).Impacts of channel variability on link-level throughput. In: wireless networks sigmetrics performance evaluation review vol 34(1), pp 51–62Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Adya A, Bahl P, Padhye J, Wolman A, Zhou L (2004). A multi-radio unification protocol for ieee 802.11 wireless networks. In: BROADNETS’04: Proceedings of the first international conference on broadband networks, IEEE Computer Society. Washington, DC, pp 344–354Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Biaz S, Qi B (2008) Iett: a quality routing metric for multi-rate multi-hop networks. In: WCNC , vol 17(25), pp 2729–2734Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Abolhasan M, Hagelstein B, Wang JC-P (2009) Real-world performance of current proactive multi-hop mesh protocols. In: Asia-Pacific conference on communication (APCC 2009) Shanghai, vol 17(8), pp 166–172Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringHunan University of Science and TechnologyXiangtanChina

Personalised recommendations