A Study of Course Assessment on C++ Programming

Conference paper
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 20)


The aim of the study is to enhance learning effectiveness, promote students’ willingness, and their constantly learning ability. Curriculum design is based on the action research method and the spiraling cycle policy. Teaching activities are designed with multi-fun activities in order to induce students’ interest and motivation in learning, and urge students to study hard. Diversified evaluations such as quality observations and quantity tests are adopted for learning assessment. Learning processes and learning attitudes are also considered. The evaluation of the effectiveness of the course rests on the measurement results through competence inventory tests and programming qualify examination. As a result of C++ programming qualify examination, 87.5% of students in the sampling class are passed. The best grade point average in School of Information Technology is obtained. All common competences are promoted except stress tolerance competence. Six of competences are grow up significantly.


Integration teaching Curriculum design Competence inventory Common competence Course assessment 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Hodson, K.K.: Multiple Perspectives, The Changing Faces of Student- Centered Teaching: Refiguring the Center. In: The 53rd Annual Meeting of the Conference on College Composition and Communication, Chicago, pp. 1–15 (2002)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Wood, R., Payne, T.: Competency-based recruitment and selection. John Wiley & Sons, New York (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Harvey, L., Locke, W., Morey, A.: Enhancing employability, recognizing diversity. Universities, London (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wu, M.L.: Introduction to education action research - theory and practice. Wunan books, Taipei (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Yang, C.K., Chia, T.L., Liu, J.J.: An Exploring of Applying Moodle System at Ming Chuan University. In: Proc. of 2011 International Conference on Information Technology and Pratical Theory Ming Chuan University, Taipei, pp. 77–85 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Felleisen, M., Findler, R.B., Flatt, M., Krishnamurthi, S.: The Teach Scheme! Project: Computing and programming for every student. Computer Science Education 14(1), 55–77 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kolling, M.B., Patterson, Q.A., Rosenberg, J.: The Blue J system and its pedagogy. Computer Science Education 13(4), 249–268 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Albanese, M.A., Mitchell, S.: Problem-based learning: A review of literature on its outcomes and implementation issues. Academic Medicine 68(1), 52–81 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Boud, D., Feletti, G.: The Challenge of Problem Based Learning, 2nd edn. Kogan Page Limited, London (1997)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Shiau, S.J., Chiang, Y.T., Huang, Y.C., Chiu, P.R.: To Explore the Embracing 3C in the Master Course of Nursing Theory. Fu-Jen Journal of Medicine 7(1), 9–16 (2009)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Pan, C.D., Lee, C.Y.: Practice and Reflection ofthecharacter education. Taiwan Journal of General Education 4, 93–120 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bruner, J.S.: Toward a theory of instruction. W.W. Norton, New York (1966)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Edwards, C.H.: Classroom principles and management. Macmillan, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Super, D.E.: Career Education and the Meaning of Work. US Dept. of Health, Education, and Welfare, Washington D.C. (1976)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Zhou, C.M., Shen, C.H.: An Analysis of the Conditions of Employment for Technological and Vocational School Graduates Majoring in Commercial Subjects. Bulletin of Educational Research 50(2), 147–178 (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    National Youth Commission: Colleges to enhanceyouth employmentforce. Executive Yuan, Taipei (2009)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cheng, N.S., Lin, P.C., Cheng, Y.C.: Developing the Competence Inventory for College Students. Psychological Testing 56(3), 397–430 (2009)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Chien, M.F.: Multi assessments idea and methods for learning and teaching. Modern Education Forum 7, 189–197 (1999)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Computer Science and Information EngineeringMing Chuan UniversityTaipeiTaiwan
  2. 2.Institute of EducationXiamen UniversityXiamenChina

Personalised recommendations