A Bibliometric Analysis of the Theses and Dissertations on Information Literacy Published in the United States and Taiwan
The purpose of this study is to explore the characteristics of the theses and dissertations on information literacy from 1988 to 2010 in the United States and Taiwan, such as publishing universities, paper growth, author/ advisor productivity, type of literacy, and research methods. The comparison of theses and dissertations on information literary research is made between those completed in the United States and Taiwan. This study investigates and maps the trends in information literacy research by applying bibliometric analysis to the 767 theses and dissertations in the field of information literacy in the United States and Taiwan. The study reveals that theses and dissertations on information literacy in Taiwan grew rapidly (502, 65.45%) and more were published than in the United States (265, 34.55%), although the first doctoral dissertation published in the United States was in 1988 while the first master thesis published in Taiwan was in 1996.The rates at which they dealt with information literacy, media literacy, and digital literacy were respectively 54.57%, 30.59%, and 14.84%, there are significant differences between the United States and Taiwan in the three types of literacy research. Furthermore, the type of methodology implemented in theses and dissertations in the United States is different from that used in Taiwan.
Keywordsinformation literacy media literacy digital literacy United States Taiwan
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 1.American Library Association. American Library Association Presidential Committee on Information Literacy Final Report (1989), http://www.infolit.org/docoents/89Report.html (retrieved August 20, 2012)
- 2.Bruce, C.S.: Information literacy research: Dimensions of the emerging collective consciousness. Australian Academic and Research Libraries (AARL) 31(2), 91–109 (2000)Google Scholar
- 3.Chuang, T.M.: The state-of-art in adult information literacy research in Taiwan: Thesis and dissertation. Library and Information Service 53(3), 9–14 (2009)Google Scholar
- 4.Creswell, J.W.: Mixed methods research. In: Given, L.M. (ed.) The Sage Encyclopedia of Qualitative Research Methods, Los, vol. 2, pp. 526–529 (2008)Google Scholar
- 5.ERIC. Information literacy (1992), http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/thesaurus/thesaurus.jsp (retrieved: August 2, 2012)
- 6.Lee, T.C.: Guidelines and evaluation indicators of information literacy education in library information services (NSC86-2413-H002-031) (1994), Retrieved from National Science Council website: https://nscnt12.nsc.gov.tw/was2/award/AsAwardMultiQuery.aspx
- 7.McClure, R.C.: Network literacy: A role for libraries? Information Technology & Libraries 13(2), 115–125 (1994)Google Scholar
- 8.OECD. The definition and selection of key competencies (2008), http://www.oecd.org/dataoecd/47/61/35070367.pdf (retrieved August 20, 2012)
- 9.Wang, G., Wu, S.T.: Research on the cognition, value and importance assessment related to the information literacy (NSC83-0111-S004-002-TL) (1994), Retrieved from National Science Council website: https://nscnt12.nsc.gov.tw/was2/award/AsAwardMultiQuery.aspx
- 10.Wang, M.L., et al.: Library and Information Literacy Education. Open University of the ROC, Taipei (2012)Google Scholar