Skip to main content

Nuances of Otoplasty

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Advanced Cosmetic Otoplasty

Abstract

Otoplasty for the prominent ear is a procedure that has undergone a number of modifications since its first description in 1881. This chapter will summarize a number of techniques that have been described over the last 100 years as well as potential postoperative complications and how to avoid them. Long-term results and general philosophies that have lead to reliable results will also be explored. A thorough understanding of the general concepts of otoplasty as well as differences between these techniques can help one to counsel patients appropriately and achieve excellent, symmetric results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lam SM. Edward Talbot Ely: father of aesthetic otoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2004;6(1):64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nuara MJ, Mobley SR. Nuances of otoplasty: a comprehensive review of the past 20 years. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2006;14(2):89–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Adamson PA, McGraw BL, Tropper GJ. Otoplasty: critical review of clinical results. Laryngoscope. 1991;101(8):883–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Richards SD, Jebreel A, Capper R. Otoplasty: a review of the surgical techniques. Clin Otolaryngol. 2005;30(1):2–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Alexander KS, Stott DJ, Sivakumar B, Kang N. A morphometric study of the human ear. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64(1):41–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Sheerin D, MacLeod M, Kusumakar V. Psychosocial adjustment in children with port-wine stains and prominent ears. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1995;34(12):1637–47.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mobley SR, Vartanian AJ, Toriumi DM. Otoplasty: surgical correction of the protruding ear. Oper Tech Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2002;13(1):29–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Songu M, Adibelli H. Otoplasty in children younger than 5 years of age. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2010;74(3):292–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Gosain AK, Kumar A, Huang G. Prominent ears in children younger than 4 years of age: what is the appropriate timing for otoplasty? Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(5):1042–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Byrd HS, Langevin CJ, Ghidoni LA. Ear molding in newborn infants with auricular deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010;126(4):1191–200.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Ullmann Y, Blazer S, Ramon Y, Blumenfeld I, Peled IJ. Early nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2002;109(3):907–13; discussion 914–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Yotsuyanagi T, Yokoi K, Urushidate S, Sawada Y. Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities in children older than early neonates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1998;101(4):907–14.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Yotsuyanagi T. Nonsurgical correction of congenital auricular deformities in children older than early neonates. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2004;114(1):190–1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Leclère FM, Trelles M, Mordon SR. Cartilage reshaping for protruding ears: a prospective long term follow-up of 32 procedures. Lasers Surg Med. 2011;43(9):875–80.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Manushakian HS, Wilson PA, De Souza BA, McGrouther DA. The prone position in otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;115(3):963–4.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Mobley SR, Miller BT, Astor FC, Fine B, Halliday NJ. Prone positioning for head and neck reconstructive surgery. Head Neck. 2007;2911:1041–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. McDowell AJ. Goals in otoplasty for protruding ears. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;41(1):17–27.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ferraro GA, Corcione A, Nicoletti G, Rossano F, Perrotta A, D’Andrea F. Blepharoplasty and otoplasty: comparative sedation with remifentanil, propofol, and midazolam. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005;29(3):181–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Pavlin DJ, Chen C, Penaloza DA, Polissar NL, Buckley FP. Pain as a factor complicating recovery and discharge after ambulatory surgery. Anesth Analg. 2002;95:627–34.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rizzi MD, Weil RJ, Lorenz RR. Severe transient hypertension after greater palatine foramen block in a patient taking midodrine. Am J Otolaryngol. 2010;31(1):67–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Berbaum MW, Bredle DL, Futamara W. Absence of significant adverse effects from low-dose subcutaneous epinephrine in dermatologic procedures. Arch Dermatol. 1997;133(10):1318–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Becker DE, Reed KL. Essentials of local anesthetic pharmacology. Anesth Prog. 2006;53(3):98–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Caouette-Laberge L, Guay N, Bortoluzzi P, Belleville C. Otoplasty: anterior scoring technique and results in 500 cases. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105(2):504–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Spira M. Otoplasty: what I do now – a 30-year perspective. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104(3):834–40.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Erol OO. New modification in otoplasty: anterior approach. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107(1):193–202.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Graham KE, Gault DT. Endoscopic assisted otoplasty: a preliminary report. Br J Plast Surg. 1997;50(1):47–57.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Fritsch MH. Incisionless otoplasty. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009;42(6):1199–208.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Converse JM, Nigro A, Wilson FA, Johnson N. A technique for surgical correction of lop ears. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1955;15(5):411–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Farrior RT. A method of otoplasty; normal contour of the antihelix and scaphoid fossa. AMA Arch Otolaryngol. 1959;69(4):400–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Furnas DW. Correction of prominent ears by concha mastoid sutures. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;42(3):189–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Horlock N, Misra A, Gault DT. The postauricular fascial flap as an adjunct to Mustardé and Furnas type otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108(6):1487–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rogers BO. The classic reprint. A new operation for prominent ears based on the anatomy of the deformity by William H. Luckett, M.D. (reprinted from Surg Gynec. & Obst., 10: 635–7, 1910). Plast Reconstr Surg. 1969;43(1):83–6.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Cloutier AM. Correction of outstanding ears. Plast Reconstr Surg Transplant Bull. 1961;28:412–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Epstein JS, Kabaker SS, Swerdloff J. The ‘electric’ otoplasty. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 1999;1(3):204–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Ragab A. Carbon dioxide laser-assisted cartilage reshaping otoplasty: a new technique for prominent ears. Laryngoscope. 2010;120(7):1312–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Stenstroem SJ. A ‘natural’ technique for correction of congenitally prominent ears. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1963;32:509–18.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Chongchet V. A method of antihelix reconstruction. Br J Plast Surg. 1963;16:268–72.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Stenström SJ, Heftner J. The Stenström otoplasty. Clin Plast Surg. 1978;5(3):465–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Tolhurst DE. The correction of prominent ears. Br J Plast Surg. 1972;25(3):261–5.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Mustarde JC. The correction of prominent ears using simple mattress sutures. Br J Plast Surg. 1963;16:170–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. de la Torre J, Tenenhaus M, Douglas BK, Swinburne JK. A simplified technique of otoplasty: the temporary Kaye suture. Ann Plast Surg. 1998;41(1):94–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Hatch MD. Common problems of otoplasty. J Int Coll Surg. 1958;30(2):171–8.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Converse JM, Wood-Smith D. Technical details in the surgical correction of the lop ear deformity. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1963;31:118–28.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Bandey SA, Atkins J, Neil WF. Silastic foam dressing in pinnaplasty. J Laryngol Otol. 1986;100(2):201–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Mitsukawa N. Auricular protection after ear surgery using a dust mask. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19(6):1639–40.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Mitsukawa N. Auricular protection after ear surgery using a door knob cover. J Craniofac Surg. 2007;18(6):1416–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. McIntire MR, Morgan RF, Kenney JG, Edgerton MT. Postoperative protection for the external ear. Ann Plast Surg. 1983;11(3):261–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  48. Bartley J. How long should ears be bandaged after otoplasty? J Laryngol Otol. 1998;112(6):531–2.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Bradbury ET, Hewison J, Timmons MJ. Psychological and social outcome of prominent ear correction in children. Br J Plast Surg. 1992;45(2):97–100.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Ramkumar S, Narayanan V, Laing JH. Twenty-four hours or 10 days? A prospective randomised controlled trial in children comparing head bandages following pinnaplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(9):969–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Orabi AA, Chintamani BH, Timms MS. Is a head bandage useful after otoplasty? A quasi-randomized controlled study of complications and patient satisfaction. Ear Nose Throat J. 2009;88(10):E17–22.

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Jackson CG. Antimicrobial prophylaxis in ear surgery. Laryngoscope. 1988;98(10):1116–23.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Sylaidis P, Wood S, Murray DS. Postoperative infection following clean facial surgery. Ann Plast Surg. 1997;39(4):342–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Tan KH. Long-term survey of prominent ear surgery: a comparison of two methods. Br J Plast Surg. 1986;39(2):270–3.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Calder JC, Naasan A. Morbidity of otoplasty: a review of 562 consecutive cases. Br J Plast Surg. 1994;47(3):170–4.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Jeffery SL. Complications following correction of prominent ears: an audit review of 122 cases. Br J Plast Surg. 1999;52(7):588–90.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Peker F, Celiköz B. Otoplasty: anterior scoring and posterior rolling technique in adults. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2002;26(4):267–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Kompatscher P, Schuler CH, Clemens S, Seifert B, Beer GM. The cartilage-sparing versus the cartilage-cutting technique: a retrospective quality control comparison of the Francesconi and Converse otoplasties. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27(6):446–53.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Panettiere P, Marchetti L, Accorsi D, Del Gaudio GA. Otoplasty: a comparison of techniques for antihelical defects treatment. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27(6):462–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Bulstrode NW, Huang S, Martin DL. Otoplasty by percutaneous anterior scoring. Another twist to the story: a long-term study of 114 patients. Br J Plast Surg. 2003;56(2):145–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Di Cio D, Castagnetti F, Baldassarre S. Otoplasty: anterior abrasion of ear cartilage with dermabrader. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2003;27(6):466–71.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Rubino C, Farace F, Figus A, Masia DR. Anterior scoring of the upper helical cartilage as a refinement in aesthetic otoplasty. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2005;29:88–93.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Mandal A, Bahia H, Ahmad T, Stewart KJ. Comparison of cartilage scoring and cartilage sparing otoplasty – a study of 203 cases. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2006;59(11):1170–6.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Salgarello M, Gasperoni C, Montagnese A, Farallo E. Otoplasty for prominent ears: a versatile combined technique to master the shape of the ear. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007;137(2):224–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Olivier B, Mohammad H, Christian A, Akram R. Retrospective study of the long-term results of otoplasty using a modified Mustardé (cartilage-sparing) technique. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2009;38(3):340–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Rigg BM. Suture materials in otoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1979;63(3):409–10.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  67. Minderjahn A, Hüttl WR, Hildmann H. Mustardé’s otoplasty – evaluation of correlation between clinical and statistical findings. J Maxillofac Surg. 1980;8(3):241–50.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Attwood AI, Evans DM. Correction of prominent ears using Mustardé’s technique: an out-patient procedure under local anaesthetic in children and adults. Br J Plast Surg. 1985;38(2):252–8.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  69. Foda HM. Otoplasty: a graduated approach. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1999;23(6):407–12.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  70. Schaverien MV, Al-Busaidi S, Stewart KJ. Long-term results of posterior suturing with postauricular fascial flap otoplasty. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63(9):1447–51.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  71. Sinha M, Richard B. Postauricular fascial flap and suture otoplasty: a prospective outcome study of 227 patients. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2012;65(3):367–71.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Schlegel-Wagner C, Pabst G, Müller W, Linder T. Otoplasty using a modified anterior scoring technique: standardized measurements of long-term results. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2010;12(3):143–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Messner AH, Crysdale WS. Otoplasty. Clinical protocol and long-term results. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1996;122(7):773–7.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  74. Schreiber NTN, Mobley SR. Advanced Cosmetic Otoplasty. In: Johnson J. Head and Neck Surgery: Otolaryngology. 5th Ed. 2013. In press.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Steven R. Mobley M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schreiber, N.T.N., Mobley, S.R. (2013). Nuances of Otoplasty. In: Shiffman, M. (eds) Advanced Cosmetic Otoplasty. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35431-1_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-35431-1_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-35430-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-35431-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics