Advertisement

Study of Phosphorus Removal Efficiency in Enhanced Biological Phosphorus Removal Process

  • Yanhui Ge
  • Lin Zhao
  • Ruochun Zhang
  • Jiayi Chen
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 223)

Abstract

An enhanced biological phosphorus removal (EBPR) system was developed in sequencing batch reactor (SBR) using acetate as the carbon source. The SBR was operated for over 2 months. Excellent phosphorus removal performance and stability were maintained in this system, where the phosphorous concentration in the effluent was below 0.6 mg/L. The Nile Blue staining was more specific than the Sudan black staining for the PHB. The DAPI staining and the Neisser staining for the poly-P were proper than other staining methods. SBR operation state after 2 months of start-up was stable.

Keywords

Enhanced biological phosphorus removal Phosphorus removal efficiency Sequencing batch reactor 

References

  1. 1.
    Zhang Z, Li H, Zhu J, Weiping L, Xin X (2011) Improvement strategy on enhanced biological phosphorus removal for municipal wastewater treatment plants: full-scale operating parameters, sludge activities, and microbial features. Bioresour Technol 102(7):4646–4653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Datta T, Goel R (2010) Evidence and long-term feasibility of enhanced biological phosphorus removal in oxidation-ditch type of aerated-anoxic activated sludge systems. J Environ Eng ASCE 136(11):1237–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Vargas M, Guisasola A, Artigues A, Casas C, Baeza JA (2011) Comparison of a nitrite-based anaerobic-anoxic EBPR system with propionate or acetate as electron donors. Process Biochem 46(3):714–720CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Pijuan M, Casas C, Baeza JA (2009) Polyhydroxyalkanoate synthesis using different carbon sources by two enhanced biological phosphorus removal microbial communities. Process Biochem 44(1):97–105CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rodgers M, Wu GX (2010) Production of polyhydroxybutyrate by activated sludge performing enhanced biological phosphorus removal. Bioresour Technol 101(3):1049–1053CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Zengin GE, Artan N, Orhon D, Satoh H, Mino T (2011) Effect of aspartate and glutamate on the fate of enhanced biological phosphorus removal process and microbial community structure. Bioresour Technol 102(2):894–903CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahn J, McIlroy S, Schroeder S, Seviour R (2009) Biomass granulation in an aerobic: anaerobic-enhanced biological phosphorus removal process in a sequencing batch reactor with varying pH. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol 36(3):885–893CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Burow LC, Mabbett AN, Borras L, Blackall LL (2009) Anaerobic central metabolic pathways active during polyhydroxyalkanoate production in uncultured cluster 1 Defluviicoccus enriched in activated sludge communities. FEMS Microbiol Lett 298(1):79–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wu L (2005) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 21th ed. Am Public Health Assoc Am Water Works Assoc Water Environ Fed 4(3):33–39Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Pijuan M, Saunders AM, Guisasola A, Baeza JA, Casas C, Blackall LL (2004) Enhanced biological phosphorus removal in a sequencing batch reactor using propionate as the sole carbon source. Biotechnol Bioeng 85(1):56–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Huang W (2002) SEPA (state environmental protection administration), AQSIQ (state administration for quality supervision and inspection and quarantine). Dis-charge Stand Pollut Munic Wastewater Treat Plant 4(6):23–25Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Panswad T, Tongkhammak N, Anotai J (2007) Estimation of intracellular phosphorus content of phosphorus-accumulating organisms at different P: COD feeding ratios. J Environ Manage 84(2):141–145CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chua ASM, Takabatake H, Satoh H, Mino T (2003) Production of polyhy-droxyalkanoates (PHA) by activated sludge treating municipal wastewater: effect of pH, sludge retention time (SRT), and acetate concentration in influent. Water Res 37(2):3602–3611CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    van Aalst-van Leeuwen MA, Pot MA, van Loosdrecht MCM, Heijin JJ (1997) Kinetic modeling of poly (b-hydroxybutyrate) production and consumption by Paracoccus pantotrophus under dynamic substrate supply. Biotechnol Bioeng 55(5):773–782Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yanhui Ge
    • 1
  • Lin Zhao
    • 1
  • Ruochun Zhang
    • 1
  • Jiayi Chen
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Environment Science and TechnologyTianjin UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations