Feature of Gender in Computer-Mediated Communication

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 223)

Abstract

My study aims to see what the communication between women and men in online chat room will be like; whether it will remain the same as that of the face-to-face interaction; whether the new way of communication under the anonymity provided by computer-mediated communication (CMC) will neutralize distinctions of gender and whether the Internet really provides escape from gender differences. By examining the messages posted by women and men when chatting online, the language features of women and men under investigation will be analyzed.

Keywords

Feature of gender Computer mediated Communication 

References

  1. 1.
    Cherny L (1994) Gender differences in text-based virtual reality. In: Bucholtz M, Liang A, Sutton L, Hines C (eds) Proceedings of the third Berkeley women and language conference, cultural performances, vol 67(5). Berkeley women and language group, Berkeley, pp 78–79Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Coates J (1986) Women, men and language, vol 56(3). Longman, New York, pp 67–69Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Coates J (1986) Women talk: conversation between women friends. Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Danet B (1998) Text as mask: gender and identity on the internet’. In: Jones S (ed) Cybersociety 2.0, vol 45(33). Sage, Thousand Oaks, pp 129–158Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Glass L (1993) He says, she says: closing the communication gap between the sexes, vol 67(10). Putnam, New York, pp 68–70Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Crystal D (2001) Language and the internet, vol 67(14). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 167–168Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Herring S, Johnson DA, DiBenedetto T (1993) Participation in electronic discourse in a “feminist” field. In: Bucholtz, Hall, and Moonwomon (eds) Proceedings of the second Berkeley women and language conference, locating power, vol 16(9). Berkeley women and language group, Berkeley, pp 250–262Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Herring S (2005) Gender and democracy in computer-mediated communication. Electron J Commun 133(2):45–47. http://www.cios.org/getfile/Herring_v3n293 Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herring S (2003) Gender and power in on-line communication. In Hlomes J, Meyerhoff M (eds) The handbook of language and gender, vol 77(3). Blackwell, Oxford, pp 202–228Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Holmes J (1995) Women, men and politeness, vol 78(45). Longman, New York, pp 67–69Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lakoff R (1975) Language and woman’s place, vol 78(12). Harper& Row, New York, pp 56–58Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Mills S (2003) Gender and politeness, vol 67(3). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 1–3Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mullany L (2004) Become the man that women desire: gender identity and dominant discourses in email advertising language. Lang Lit 13(8):291–305Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Spender D (1996) Nattering on the net: women, power and cyberspace, vol 56(8). Garamond Press, Toronto, pp 123–125Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Tourism College of ZhejiangHangZhouChina

Personalised recommendations