Study of the Value Orientation of Physical Education
Currently, the value orientation of China’s Physical Education (PE) reform is of binary opposition, which was demonstrated in terms of education aim, teaching strategies, and education evaluation. The binary opposition is rooted in the misinterpretation of quality-oriented education. In the process of developing quality-oriented education, we still need to adjust in the aspects of teacher training, specialty course setup in teachers colleges and management system. An effective approach to eliminating the cognitive dissonance is to integrate humanism and scientism, exam-oriented education and quality-oriented, the traditional and new curriculum views, etc.
KeywordsPhysical education Binary opposition Attribution analysis Value orientations
This research project was supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities of Southwest University (SWU0909673). Here the authors would like to express heartfelt thanks.
- 1.Wang DJ, Wang HL (1999) Education, vol 51(05). People’s Education Publishing House, pp 28–35Google Scholar
- 2.Gerhard Parke (2001) Knowledge, freedom and order, vol 33(15). China Social Sciences Publishing House, Beijing, pp 134–139Google Scholar
- 3.Chen P (2000) Education’s true problems or pseudo-problems? Chinese Educ 12(7):110–115Google Scholar
- 4.Fastener L, Zhen Q (Trans) (1999) Cognitive dissonance theory, vol 65(8). Zhejiang Education Publishing House, Hangzhou, pp 227–235Google Scholar
- 5.Fastener L (1957) A theory of cognitive dissonance, vol 51(11). Stanford University Press, pp 18–57Google Scholar
- 6.Spillane JP (2002) Local theories of teacher change: the pedagogy of district policies and programs. Teachers college record 06(3):377–420Google Scholar
- 7.Fullan M, Hargreaves A (eds) (2002) Teacher development and educational change vol 17(3). Teacher Education, pp 377–420Google Scholar
- 8.Poser H, Wenchao L (Trans) (2002) Science: what is science? vol 29(45). Shanghai San Lian Bookstore Press, Shanghai, pp 182–159Google Scholar
- 9.Fang bin Z (Trans) (2002). Human science epistemology, vol 28(66). Central Compilation and Translation Press, Beijing, pp 1124–1128 (Piaget)Google Scholar