Overview: Conflict in Human Experience

  • Robin R. Vallacher
  • Peter T. Coleman
  • Andrzej Nowak
  • Lan Bui-Wrzosinska
  • Larry Liebovitch
  • Katharina G. Kugler
  • Andrea Bartoli
Part of the Peace Psychology Book Series book series (PPBS)


This is a book about conflict. But it is also a book about essential features of human nature that are expressed in every type of human interaction. In an even broader sense, this is a book about the basic processes that link conflict to a vast array of phenomena in the physical world. These seem like incompatible agendas. Conflict is not the only way humans interact, after all, and the conflicts that define human interactions would seem to have little in common with things like weather patterns, landslides, or bacterial growth. But as we shall see, science in recent years has exposed a set of basic operating rules that connect processes of all kinds in physical and social reality. This synthetic view is more than an abstraction; to the contrary, breakthroughs in mathematics, empirical methodology, and computer simulations have enabled scientists to identify the ways in which common processes and properties are manifest in very different phenomena. Our aim is to describe this new perspective and shine its concepts, methods, and tools on the recurrent and all-important issue of conflict in interpersonal, intergroup, and international relations.


Nonlinear Dynamical System Social Conflict Complexity Science Intergroup Relation Artificial Gravity 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Azar, E. E. (1986). Management of protracted social conflict in the third world. Ethnic Studies Report, 4, 1–17.Google Scholar
  2. Azar, E. E. (1990). The management of protracted social conflict. Aldershot: Dartmouth.Google Scholar
  3. Bar-Tal, D. (2007). Social-psychological foundations of intractable conflict. The American Behavioral Scientist, 50, 1430–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bennett, D. S. (1996). Security, bargaining, and the end of interstate rivalry. International Studies Quarterly, 40, 157–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bercovitch, J. (2005). Mediation in the most resistant cases. In C. A. Crocker, F. O. Hampson, & P. Aall (Eds.), Grasping the nettle: Analyzing cases of intractable conflict. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  6. Brunswick, E. (1956). Perception and the representative design of experiments (2nd ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  7. Burton, J. (1987). Resolving deep-rooted conflict: A handbook. Lanham, MD: University Press of America.Google Scholar
  8. Cairns, E., & Darby, J. (1998). The conflict in Northern Ireland: Causes, consequences, and controls. The American Psychologist, 53, 754–760.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Coleman, P. T. (2000a). Intractable conflict. In M. Deutsch & P. T. Coleman (Eds.), The handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (pp. 428–450). San Francisco, CA: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Coleman, P. T. (2000b). Fostering ripeness in seemingly intractable conflict: An experimental study. International Journal of Conflict Management, 11, 300–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman, P. T. (2003). Characteristics of protracted, intractable conflict: Toward the development of a metaframework—I. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 9, 1–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Coleman, P. T. (2004). Paradigmatic framing of protracted, intractable conflict: Towards the development of a meta-framework—II. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 10, 197–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coleman, P. T. (2006). Conflict, complexity, and change: A meta-framework for addressing protracted, intractable conflicts—III. Peace and Conflict: Journal of Peace Psychology, 12, 325–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coleman, P. T. (2011). The five percent: Finding solutions to seemingly impossible conflicts. New York, NY: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  15. Coleman, P. T., Bui-Wrzosinska, L., Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (2006). Protracted conflicts as dynamical systems. In A. K. Schneider & C. Honeyman (Eds.), The negotiator’s fieldbook: The desk reference for the experienced negotiator (pp. 61–74). Chicago: American Bar Association.Google Scholar
  16. Crocker, C. A., & Hampson, F. O. (2004). Taming intractable conflicts: Mediation in the hardest cases. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  17. Crocker, C. A., Hampson, F. O., & Aall, P. (2005). Grasping the nettle: Analyzing cases of intractable conflict. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  18. De Dreu, C. K. W. (2010). Social conflict: The emergence and consequences of struggle and negotiation. In S. T. Fiske, D. T. Gilbert, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (5th ed., pp. 983–1023). San Francisco, CA: Wiley.Google Scholar
  19. De Dreu, C. K. W., & Gelfand, M. J. (2008). Conflict in the workplace: Sources, dynamics and functions across multiple levels of analysis. In C. K. W. De Dreu & M. J. Gelfand (Eds.), The psychology of conflict and conflict management in organizations. New York, NY: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  20. Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Deutsch, M., Coleman, P. T., & Marcus, E. C. (Eds.). (2006). Handbook of conflict resolution: Theory and practice (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  22. Diehl, P. F., & Goertz, G. (2001). War and peace in international rivalry. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  23. Fiol, C. M., Pratt, M. G., & O’Connor, E. J. (2009). Managing intractable identity conflicts. The Academy of Management Review, 34, 32–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Follet, M. P. (1973). Power. In E. M. Fox & L. Urwick (Eds.), Dynamic administration: The collected papers of Mary Parker Follett (pp. 66–87). London: Pitman. Original work published in 1925.Google Scholar
  25. Goertz, G., & Diehl, P. F. (1993). Enduring rivalries: Theoretical constructs and empirical patterns. International Studies Quarterly, 37, 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guastello, S., Koopmans, M., & Pincus, D. (Eds.). (2009). Chaos and complexity in psychology: The theory of nonlinear dynamical systems. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Holland, J. (1995a). Can there be a unified theory of complex adaptive systems? In H. J. Morowitz & J. L. Singer (Eds.), The mind, the brain, and complex adaptive systems. Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  28. Holland, J. H. (1995b). Emergence: From chaos to order. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.Google Scholar
  29. Kelman, H. (1999). The interdependence of Israeli and Palestinian national identities: The role of the other in existential conflicts. Journal of Social Issues, 55, 581–600.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kriesberg, L. (1999). Intractable conflict. In E. Weiner (Ed.), The handbook of interethnic coexistence (pp. 332–342). New York, NY: Continuum.Google Scholar
  31. Kriesberg, L. (2005). Nature, dynamics, and phases of intractability. In C. A. Crocker, F. O. Hampson, & P. Aall (Eds.), Grasping the nettle: Analyzing cases of intractable conflict (pp. 65–98). Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  32. Kriesberg, L., Northrup, T. A., & Thorson, S. J. (1989). Intractable conflicts and their transformation. Syracuse, NY: Syracuse University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Lederach, J. P. (1997). Building peace: Sustainable reconciliation in divided societies. Washington, DC: United States Institute of Peace.Google Scholar
  34. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of topological psychology. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marshall, M. G., & Gurr, T. R. (2005). Peace and conflict. College Park, MD: Center for International Development and Conflict Management.Google Scholar
  36. Milgram, S. (1974). Obedience to authority: An experimental view. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  37. Morawski, J. (2000). Social psychology a century ago. The American Psychologist, 55, 427–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Nowak, A., & Vallacher, R. (1998). Dynamical social psychology. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  39. Pearce, W. B., & Littlejohn, S. W. (1997). Moral conflict: When social worlds collide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  40. Pondy, L. R. (1967). Organizational conflict: Concepts and models. Administrative Science Quarterly, 12, 296–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Pruitt, D. G., & Olczak, P. V. (1995). Resolving seemingly intractable conflict. In B. B. Bunker & J. Z. Rubin (Eds.), Conflict, cooperation, and justice: Essays inspired by the work of Morton Deutsch. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  42. Strogatz, S. (2003). Sync: The emerging science of spontaneous order. New York, NY: Hyperion Books.Google Scholar
  43. Vallacher, R. R., Coleman, P. T., Nowak, A., & Bui-Wrosinska, L. (2010). Rethinking intractable conflict: The perspective of dynamical systems. The American Psychologist, 65, 262–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (Eds.). (1994a). Dynamical systems in social psychology. San Diego, CA: Academic.Google Scholar
  45. Vallacher, R. R., & Nowak, A. (2007). Dynamical social psychology: Finding order in the flow of human experience. In A. W. Kruglanski & E. T. Higgins (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 734–758). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  46. Waldrop, M. M. (1992). Complexity: The emerging science at the edge of order and chaos. New York, NY: Schuster.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Robin R. Vallacher
    • 1
  • Peter T. Coleman
    • 2
  • Andrzej Nowak
    • 3
  • Lan Bui-Wrzosinska
    • 4
  • Larry Liebovitch
    • 5
  • Katharina G. Kugler
    • 6
  • Andrea Bartoli
    • 7
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyFlorida Atlantic UniversityBoca RatonUSA
  2. 2.International Center for Cooperation and Conflict Resolution Teachers CollegeColumbia UniversityNew YorkUSA
  3. 3.Department of PsychologyUniversity of WarsawWarsawPoland
  4. 4.International Center for Complexity and ConflictWarsaw School of Social Sciences and HumanitiesWarsawPoland
  5. 5.Division of Mathematics and Natural SciencesCity University of New York Queens CollegeNew YorkUSA
  6. 6.Economic and Organisational PsychologyLudwig-Maximilians-Universitaet MuenchenMunichGermany
  7. 7.School for Conflict Analysis and ResolutionGeorge Mason UniversityArlingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations