Advertisement

Preconditioning High–Order Discontinuous Galerkin Discretizations of Elliptic Problems

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computational Science and Engineering book series (LNCSE, volume 91)

Abstract

In recent years, attention has been devoted to the development of efficient iterative solvers for the solution of the linear system of equations arising from the discontinuous Galerkin (DG) discretization of a range of model problems. In the framework of two level preconditioners, scalable non-overlapping Schwarz methods have been proposed and analyzed for the h–version of the DG method in the articles [1, 2, 6, 7, 9]. Recently, in [3] it has been proved that the non-overlapping Schwarz preconditioners can also be successfully employed to reduce the condition number of the stiffness matrices arising from a wide class of high–order DG discretizations of elliptic problems. In this article we aim to validate the theoretical results derived in [3] for the multiplicative Schwarz preconditioner and for its symmetrized variant by testing their numerical performance.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Bibliography

  1. [1].
    P. F. Antonietti and B. Ayuso. Schwarz domain decomposition preconditioners for discontinuous Galerkin approximations of elliptic problems: non-overlapping case. M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 41(1):21–54, 2007.Google Scholar
  2. [2].
    P. F. Antonietti and B. Ayuso. Multiplicative Schwarz methods for discontinuous Galerkin approximations of elliptic problems. M2AN Math. Model. Numer. Anal., 42(3):443–469, 2008.Google Scholar
  3. [3].
    P. F. Antonietti and P. Houston. A class of domain decomposition preconditioners for h p-discontinuous Galerkin finite element methods. J. Sci. Comp., 46(1):124–149, 2011.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. [4].
    D. N. Arnold. An interior penalty finite element method with discontinuous elements. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 19(4):742–760, 1982.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. [5].
    D. N. Arnold, F. Brezzi, B. Cockburn, and L. D. Marini. Unified analysis of discontinuous Galerkin methods for elliptic problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 39(5):1749–1779 (electronic), 2001/02.Google Scholar
  6. [6].
    A. T. Barker, S. C. Brenner, P. Eun-Hee, and L.-Y. Sung. Two-level additive Schwarz preconditioners for a weakly over-penalized symmetric interior penalty method. J. Sci. Comp., 47:27–49, 2011.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. [7].
    S. C. Brenner and K. Wang. Two-level additive Schwarz preconditioners for C 0 interior penalty methods. Numer. Math., 102(2):231–255, 2005.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. [8].
    S. C. Eisenstat, H. C. Elman, and M. H. Schultz. Variational iterative methods for nonsymmetric systems of linear equations. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 20(2):345–357, 1983.MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. [9].
    X. Feng and O. A. Karakashian. Two-level additive Schwarz methods for a discontinuous Galerkin approximation of second order elliptic problems. SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 39(4):1343–1365 (electronic), 2001.Google Scholar
  10. [10].
    A. Toselli and O. Widlund. Domain decomposition methods—algorithms and theory, volume 34 of Springer Series in Computational Mathematics. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, 2005.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.MOX, Dipartimento di MatematicaPolitecnico di MilanoMilanoITALY
  2. 2.School of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of NottinghamNottinghamUK

Personalised recommendations