V&V to Use Agile Approach in ES Development: Why RDR Works for Expert System Developments!

  • HeeGuen Yoon
  • Soyeon Caren Han
  • Byeong Ho Kang
  • Seong-Bae Park
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 340)

Abstract

In artificial intelligence, many researchers have proposed several expert system development approaches but most of them failed to deal with two issues, maintenance and analysis. It is better to find an alternative solution from other areas, rather than to waste time waiting any longer. We found that researchers in computer software development also have been suffering from the difficulty of maintenance and analysis, just as in the expert system development area. To solve this problem, agile software development is used to overcome the difficulty of analysis, and business rules approach is utilised for removing maintenance issues. We believe that the two approaches are the ideal solutions that are able to formalize the expert system development process. In this paper, we outline this novel approach, Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rule, which is based on agile software development and business rules approach.

Keywords

Agile approach Business rule approach MCRDR 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Liao, S.-H.: Expert system methodologies and applications-a decade review from 1995 to 2004. Expert Systems with Applications 28, 93–103 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Zelkowitz, M.V., Yeh, R.T., Hamlet, R.G., Gannon, J.D., Basili, V.R.: Software Engineering Practices in the US and Japan. IEEE Computer 17, 57–66 (1984)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Schreiber, G., Wielinga, B., De Hoogh, R., Akkermans, H., Van de Velde, W.: CommonKADS: A comprehensive methodology for KBS development. IEEE Expert (IEEE Intelligent Systems), 28–38 (1994)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Blythe, J., Kim, J., Ramachandran, S., Gil, Y.: An Integrated Environment for Knowledge Acquisition. In: Proceedings the 6th International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hazzan, O., Dubinsky, Y.: Why Software Engineering Programs Should Teach Agile Software Development. ACM SIGSOFT Software Engineering Notes 32 (2007)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    O’Neil, B.: Business Rules to the Rescue in the 21st Century!. Presented at the ODTUG 2001 - Business Rules Symposium (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Piaget, J.: The child’s conception of the world. Routledge and Kegan Paul, London (1929)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kajko-Mattsson, M.: Problems in agile trenches. In: Proceedings of the Second ACM-IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, pp. 111–119 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grossner, C., Preece, A.D., Chander, P.G., Radhakrishnan, T., Suen, C.Y.: Exploring the structure of rule based systems. In: Proceedings of the Eleventh National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 704–709 (1993)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kang, B.H., Gambetta, W., Compton, P.: Verification and validation with ripple-down rules. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 44, 257–269 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kang, B.H., Compton, P., Preston, P.: Multiple Classification Ripple Down Rules: Evaluation and Possibilities. In: Proceedings of the 9th Banff Knowledge Acquisition for Knowledge Based Systems (1995)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Cao, T.M., Martin, E., Compton, P.: On the Convergence of Incremental Knowledge Base Construction. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Discovery Science, pp. 207–218 (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kang, B.H.: Validating knowledge acquisition: multiple classification ripple-down rules. University of New South Wales (1996)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Compton, P., Peters, L., Edwards, G., Lavers, T.G.: Experience with Ripple-Down Rules. In: Proceedings of the SGAI International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 109–121 (2005)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Park, S.S., Kim, Y.S., Kang, B.H.: Web Document Classification: Managing Context Change. In: Proceedings of the IADIS International Conference WWW/Internet (2004)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bindoff, I., Kang, B.H., Ling, T., Tenni, P., Peterson, G.: Applying MCRDR to a Multidisciplinary Domain. In: Orgun, M.A., Thornton, J. (eds.) AI 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4830, pp. 519–528. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • HeeGuen Yoon
    • 1
  • Soyeon Caren Han
    • 2
  • Byeong Ho Kang
    • 2
  • Seong-Bae Park
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Computer Science and EngineeringKyungpook National UniversityDaeguRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.School of Computing and Information SystemUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations