Architecture-Driven Modeling of Adaptive Collaboration Structures in Large-Scale Social Web Applications

  • Christoph Dorn
  • Richard N. Taylor
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7651)


Internet-based, large-scale systems provide the technical foundation for massive online collaboration forms such as social networks, crowdsourcing, content sharing, or source code generation. Such systems are typically designed to adapt at the software level to achieve availability and scalability. They, however, remain mostly unaware of the changing requirements of the various ongoing collaborations. As a consequence, cooperative efforts cannot grow and evolve as easily nor efficiently as they need to. An adaptation mechanism needs to become aware of a collaboration’s structure and flexibility to consider changing collaboration requirements during system reconfiguration. To this end, this paper presents the human Architecture Description Language (hADL) for describing the envisioned collaboration dynamics. Inspired by software architecture concepts, hADL introduces human components and collaboration connectors for describing the underlying human coordination dependencies. We further outline a methodology for designing collaboration patterns based on a set of fundamental principles that facilitate runtime adaptation. An exemplary model transformation demonstrates hADL’s feasibility. It produces the group permission configuration for MediaWiki in reaction to changing collaboration conditions.


Design Tools and Techniques Collaboration Patterns Adaptation Flexibility 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Ceri, S., Daniel, F., Matera, M., Facca, F.M.: Model-driven development of context-aware web applications. ACM Trans. Internet Technol. 7 (February 2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chopra, A.K., Paja, E., Giorgini, P.: Sociotechnical Trust: An Architectural Approach. In: Jeusfeld, M., Delcambre, L., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2011. LNCS, vol. 6998, pp. 104–117. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dashofy, E.M., van der Hoek, A., Taylor, R.N.: A comprehensive approach for the development of modular software architecture description languages. ACM Trans. Softw. Eng. Methodol. 14, 199–245 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dorn, C., Taylor, R.N.: Analyzing runtime adaptability of collaboration patterns. In: International Conference on Collaboration Technologies and Systems (CTS). IEEE Computer Society, Los Alamitos (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dorn, C., Taylor, R.N., Dustdar, S.: Flexible social workflows: Collaborations as human architecture. IEEE Internet Computing 16, 72–77 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dustdar, S.: Caramba- Process-Aware Collaboration System Supporting Ad hoc and Collaborative Processes in Virtual Teams. Distributed Parallel Databases 15(1), 45–66 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Garlan, D., Monroe, R., Wile, D.: Acme: an architecture description interchange language. In: Proceedings of the 1997 Conference of the Centre for Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research, CASCON 1997, pp. 169–183. IBM Press (1997)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hull, R.: Artifact-centric business process models: Brief survey of research results and challenges. In: Meersman, R., Tari, Z. (eds.) OTM 2008, Part II. LNCS, vol. 5332, pp. 1152–1163. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Little, G., Chilton, L.B., Miller, R., Goldman, M.: Turkit: Tools for iterative tasks on mechanical turk. In: Human Computation Workshop, HComp 2009 (2009)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Malone, T.W., Crowston, K.: The interdisciplinary study of coordination. ACM Comput. Surv. 26, 87–119 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Minder, P., Bernstein, A.: Crowdlang - first steps towards programmable human computers for general computation. In: Proceedings of the 3rd Human Computation Workshop (HCOMP 2011). AAAI Press (January 2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Moody, P., Gruen, D., Muller, M.J., Tang, J., Moran, T.P.: Business Activity Patterns: A New Model for Collaborative Business Applications (2006)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nandi, P., Koenig, D., Moser, S., Hull, R., Klicnik, V., Claussen, S., Kloppman, M., Vergo, J.: Data4BPM, part 1: Introducing business entities and the business entity definition language (BEDL) (April 2010),
  14. 14.
    Oreizy, P., Medvidovic, N., Taylor, R.N.: Runtime software adaptation: framework, approaches, and styles. In: Companion of the 30th Intl. Conf. on Software Engineering, ICSE Companion 2008, pp. 899–910. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Schall, D.: A human-centric runtime framework for mixed service-oriented systems. Distributed and Parallel Databases 29, 333–360 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Schwinger, W., Retschitzegger, W., Schauerhuber, A., Kappel, G., Wimmer, M., Pröll, B., Castro, C.C., Casteleyn, S., Troyer, O.D., Fraternali, P., et al.: A survey on web modeling approaches for ubiquitous web applications. International Journal of Web Information Systems 4(3), 234–305 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Silva Souza, V.E., Lapouchnian, A., Mylopoulos, J.: System Identification for Adaptive Software Systems: A Requirements Engineering Perspective. In: Jeusfeld, M., Delcambre, L., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2011. LNCS, vol. 6998, pp. 346–361. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Taylor, R.N., Medvidovic, N., Dashofy, E.M.: Software Architecture: Foundations, Theory, and Practice. Wiley (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Taylor, R.N., Medvidovic, N., Oreizy, P.: Architectural styles for runtime software adaptation. In: WICSA/ECSA, pp. 171–180 (2009)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Teruel, M.A., Navarro, E., López-Jaquero, V., Montero, F., González, P.: CSRML: A Goal-Oriented Approach to Model Requirements for Collaborative Systems. In: Jeusfeld, M., Delcambre, L., Ling, T.-W. (eds.) ER 2011. LNCS, vol. 6998, pp. 33–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wilde, E., Gaedke, M.: Web engineering revisited. In: BCS Int. Acad. Conf. pp. 41–50 (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wohed, P., van der Aalst, W., Dumas, M., ter Hofstede, A., Russell, N.: On the Suitability of BPMN for Business Process Modelling. In: Dustdar, S., Fiadeiro, J.L., Sheth, A.P. (eds.) BPM 2006. LNCS, vol. 4102, pp. 161–176. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christoph Dorn
    • 1
  • Richard N. Taylor
    • 1
  1. 1.Institute for Software ResearchUniversity of CaliforniaIrvineUSA

Personalised recommendations