Abstract
The BB84 protocol is used by Alice (the sender) and Bob (the receiver) to settle on a secret classical bit-string by communicating qubits over an insecure quantum channel where Eve (the Eavesdropper) can have access. In this paper, we revisit a well known eavesdropping technique against BB84. We claim that there exist certain gaps in understanding the existing eavesdropping strategy in terms of cryptanalytic view and we try to bridge those gaps in this paper.
First we refer to the result where it is shown that in the six-state variant of the BB84 protocol (Bruß, Phys. Rev. Lett., 1998), the mutual information between Alice (the sender) and Eve (the eavesdropper) is higher when two-bit probe is used compared to the one-bit probe and hence the two-bit probe provides a stronger eavesdropping strategy. However, from cryptanalytic point of view, we show that Eve has the same success probability in guessing the bit transmitted by Alice in both the cases of the two-bit and the one-bit probe. Thus, we point out that having higher mutual information may not directly lead to obtaining higher probability in guessing the key bit.
It is also explained in the work of Bruß that the six-state variant of the BB84 protocol is more secure than the traditional four-state BB84. We look into this point in more detail and identify that this advantage is only achieved at the expense of communicating more qubits in the six-state protocol. In fact, we present different scenarios, where given the same number of qubits communicated, the security comparison of the four and six-state protocols is evaluated carefully.
Keywords
- Advantage
- BB84
- Key Distribution
- Optimal Eavesdropping
- Quantum Cryptography
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsPreview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G.: Quantum Cryptography: Public key distribution and coin tossing. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computers, Systems, and Signal Processing, Bangalore, India, pp. 175–179. IEEE, New York (1984)
Bennett, C.H., Brassard, G., Robert, J.M.: Privacy amplification by public discussion. SIAM Journal on Computing 17(2), 210–229 (1988)
Bennett, C.H., Bessette, F., Brassard, G., Salvail, L., Smolin, J.: Experimental quantum cryptography. Journal of Cryptology 5(1), 3–28 (1992)
Bernstein, D.J., Buchmann, J., Dahmen, E. (eds.): Post-Quantum Cryptography. Springer (2009)
Biham, E., Mor, T.: Bounds on Information and the Security of Quantum Cryptography. Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 4034–4037 (1997)
Bruß, D.: Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography with six states. Physical Review Letters 81, 3018–3021 (1998) (quant-ph/9805019)
Cirac, J.I., Gisin, N.: Coherent eavesdropping strategies for the 4 state quantum cryptography protocol. Physics Letters A 229(1), 1–7 (1997) (quant-ph/9702002)
Cover, T., Thomas, J.: Elements of Information Theory, 1st edn., pp. 16–20. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1991)
Diffie, W., Hellman, M.E.: New Directions in Cryptography. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory 22, 644–654 (1976)
Fuchs, C.A., Gisin, N., Griffiths, R.B., Niu, C.S., Peres, A.: Optimal eavesdropping in quantum cryptography. I. Information bound and optimal strategy. Physical Review A 56(2), 1163–1172 (1997)
Miller, V.S.: Use of Elliptic Curves in Cryptography. In: Williams, H.C. (ed.) CRYPTO 1985. LNCS, vol. 218, pp. 417–426. Springer, Heidelberg (1986)
Nielsen, M.A., Chuang, I.L.: Quantum Computation and Quantum Information. Cambridge University Press (2002)
Phoenix, S.J.D.: Quantum cryptography without conjugate coding. Physical Review A 48(1), 96–102 (1993)
Quantum Key Distribution Equipment. ID Quantique (IDQ), http://www.idquantique.com/
Quantum Key Distribution System (Q-Box). MagiQ Technologies Inc., http://www.magiqtech.com
Rivest, R.L., Shamir, A., Adleman, L.: A Method for Obtaining Digital Signatures and Public Key Cryptosystems. Communications of the ACM 21, 120–126 (1978)
Shor, P.: Algorithms for Quantum Computation: Discrete Logarithms and Factoring. In: Foundations of Computer Science (FOCS), pp. 124–134. IEEE Computer Society Press (1994)
Stinson, D.: Cryptography Theory and Practice, 3rd edn., pp. 80–81. Chapman & Hall / CRC (2005)
Wiesner, S.: Conjugate Coding (1970) (manuscript); subsequently published in SIGACT News 15(1), 78–88 (1983)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Maitra, A., Paul, G. (2012). Another Look at Symmetric Incoherent Optimal Eavesdropping against BB84. In: Galbraith, S., Nandi, M. (eds) Progress in Cryptology - INDOCRYPT 2012. INDOCRYPT 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7668. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34931-7_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34931-7_6
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34930-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34931-7
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)
