Advertisement

Towards Fuzzy Transfer Learning for Intelligent Environments

  • Jethro Shell
  • Simon Coupland
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7683)

Abstract

By their very nature, Intelligent Environments (IE’s) are infused with complexity, unreliability and uncertainty due to a combination of sensor noise and the human element. The quantity, type and availability of data to model these applications can be a major issue. Each situation is contextually different and constantly changing. The dynamic nature of the implementations present a challenging problem when attempting to model or learn a model of the environment. Training data to construct the model must be within the same feature space and have the same distribution as the target task data, however this is often highly costly and time consuming. There can even be occurrences were a complete lack of labelled target data occurs. It is within these situations that our study is focussed. In this paper we propose a framework to dynamically model IE’s through the use of data sets from differing feature spaces and domains. The framework is constructed using a novel Fuzzy Transfer Learning (FuzzyTL) process.

The use of a FuzzyTL algorithm allows for a source of labelled data to improve the learning of an alternative context task. We will demonstrate the application of an Fuzzy Inference System (FIS) to produce a model from a source Intelligent Environment (IE) which can provide the knowledge for a differing target context. We will investigate the use of FuzzyTL within differing contextual distributions through the use of temporal and spatial alternative domains.

Keywords

Fuzzy Logic Transfer Learning Intelligent Environments Ambient Intelligence Context-Aware 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arslan, A., Kaya, M.: Determination of fuzzy logic membership functions using genetic algorithms. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 118(2), 297–306 (2001)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Blanke, U., Schiele, B.: Remember and transfer what you have learned-recognizing composite activities based on activity spotting. In: 2010 International Symposium on Wearable Computers (ISWC), pp. 1–8. IEEE (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bokareva, T., Hu, W., Kanhere, S., Ristic, B., Gordon, N., Bessell, T., Rutten, M., Jha, S.: Wireless sensor networks for battlefield surveillance. In: Proceedings of Land Warfare Conference 2006, Citeseer (2006)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casillas, J., Cordón, O., Herrera, F.: Improving the wang and mendels fuzzy rule learning method by inducing cooperation among rules. In: Proceedings of the 8th Information Processing and Management of Uncertainty in Knowledge-Based Systems Conference, pp. 1682–1688 (2000)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, M.Y., Linkens, D.A.: Rule-base self-generation and simplification for data-driven fuzzy models. In: The 10th IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, vol. 1, pp. 424–427. IEEE (2001)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chok, H., Gruenwald, L.: Spatio-temporal association rule mining framework for real-time sensor network applications. In: Proceeding of the 18th ACM Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, pp. 1761–1764. ACM (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Deshpande, A., Guestrin, C., Madden, S.R., Hellerstein, J.M., Hong, W.: Model-driven data acquisition in sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases. VLDB Endowment, vol. 30, pp. 588–599 (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farhadi, A., Tabrizi, M.K.: Learning to Recognize Activities from the Wrong View Point. In: Forsyth, D., Torr, P., Zisserman, A. (eds.) ECCV 2008, Part I. LNCS, vol. 5302, pp. 154–166. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Herrera, F.: Genetic fuzzy systems: taxonomy, current research trends and prospects. Evolutionary Intelligence 1(1), 27–46 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Jung, Y.J., Lee, Y.K., Lee, D.G., Ryu, K.H., Nittel, S.: Air Pollution Monitoring System based on Geosensor Network 3 (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kidd, C.D., Orr, R., Abowd, G.D., Atkeson, C.G., Essa, I.A., MacIntyre, B., Mynatt, E., Starner, T.E., Newstetter, W., et al.: The aware home: A living laboratory for ubiquitous computing research. LNCS, pp. 191–198 (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Luhr, S., West, G., Venkatesh, S.: Recognition of emergent human behaviour in a smart home: A data mining approach. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 3(2), 95–116 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Madden, S.: Intel lab data (June 2004), http://db.csail.mit.edu/labdata/labdata.html (published on 2nd June 2004)
  14. 14.
    Pan, S.J., Kwok, J.T., Yang, Q.: Transfer learning via dimensionality reduction. In: Proceedings of the 23rd National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 677–682 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Popescu, M., Coupland, S.: A Fuzzy Logic System for Acoustic Fall Detection. In: Skubic, M. (ed.) Proc. 2008 AAAI Symposium on AI in Eldercare. AAAI, Washington DC (2008)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Raina, R., Battle, A., Lee, H., Packer, B., Ng, A.Y.: Self-taught learning: transfer learning from unlabeled data. In: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Machine Learning, pp. 759–766. ACM (2007)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Rashidi, P., Cook, D.J.: Multi home transfer learning for resident activity discovery and recognition. In: KDD Knowledge Discovery from Sensor Data, pp. 56–63 (2010)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ross, T.J.: Fuzzy logic with engineering applications. Wiley Online Library (1997)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Simon, G., Maróti, M., Lédeczi, Á., Balogh, G., Kusy, B., Nádas, A., Pap, G., Sallai, J., Frampton, K.: Sensor network-based countersniper system. In: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Embedded Networked Sensor Systems, pp. 1–12. ACM, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sixsmith, A., Johnson, N.: A smart sensor to detect the falls of the elderly. IEEE Pervasive Computing 3(2), 42–47 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Wang, L.-X.: The wm method completed: a flexible fuzzy system approach to data mining. IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy Systems 11(6), 768–782 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Wang, L.X., Mendel, J.M.: Generating fuzzy rules by learning from examples. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man and Cybernetics 22(6), 1414–1427 (1992)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wang, Q., Shin, W., Liu, X., Zeng, Z., Oh, C., AlShebli, B.K., Caccamo, M., Gunter, C.A., Gunter, E., Hou, J., et al.: I-Living: An open system architecture for assisted living, Citeseer (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wood, A., Stankovic, J., Virone, G., Selavo, L., He, Z., Cao, Q., Doan, T., Wu, Y., Fang, L., Stoleru, R.: Context-aware wireless sensor networks for assisted living and residential monitoring. IEEE Network 22(4), 26–33 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Fuzzy logic. Computer 21(4), 83–93 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jethro Shell
    • 1
  • Simon Coupland
    • 1
  1. 1.De Montfort UniversityLeicesterUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations