Structural Writing, a Design Principle for Interactive Drama

  • Nicolas Szilas
  • Urs Richle
  • Jean E. Dumas
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7648)

Abstract

Computer-based highly interactive drama involves different authoring approaches, compared to linear media. Underlying design principles needs to be understood in order to guide the authoring process, to teach authors and to design better systems. This paper identifies a fundamental design principle termed Structural Writing that underlies some of the most generative approaches in interactive drama. A theoretical description of this principle is proposed, which leads to a general architecture for interactive drama that may help authors and researchers to design systems that better exploit the principle of structural writing.

Keywords

interactive storytelling interactive drama authoring creation process design principle structural writing structuralism 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aylett, R., et al.: Unscripted narrative for affectively driven characters. IEEE Journal of Graphics and Animation 26, 42–52 (2006)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Barthes, R.: Introduction à l’analyse structurale des récits. Communications 8(1), 1–27 (1966)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cavazza, M., Charles, F., Mead, S.J.: Characters in Search of an Author: AI-Based Virtual Storytelling. In: Balet, O., Subsol, G., Torguet, P. (eds.) ICVS 2001. LNCS, vol. 2197, pp. 145–154. Springer, Heidelberg (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ciarlini, A.E.M., Camanho, M.M., Dória, T.R., Furtado, A.L., Pozzer, C.T., Feijó, B.: Planning and Interaction Levels for TV Storytelling. In: Spierling, U., Szilas, N. (eds.) ICIDS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5334, pp. 198–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Eco, U.: Lector in fabula: Le rôle du lecteur ou la Coopération interprétative dans les textes narratifs. Grasset, Paris (1985)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Egri, L.: The art of dramatic writing. Simon & Shuster, New York (1946)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fairclough, C.R.: Story Games and the OPIATE System. University of Dublin, Trinity College (2004)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Field, S.: Screenplay – The Foundations of Screenwriting. Dell Publishing, New York (1984)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Greimas, A.J.: Sémantique structurale, Presses universitaires de France, Paris (1966)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lavandier, Y.: La dramaturgie. Le clown et l’enfant, Cergy, France (1997)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Levi-Strauss, C.: Anthropologie Structurale. Plon, Paris (1958)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Louchart, S., Aylett, R.S., Dias, J.: Double Appraisal for Synthetic Characters. In: Pelachaud, C., Martin, J.-C., André, E., Chollet, G., Karpouzis, K., Pelé, D. (eds.) IVA 2007. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4722, pp. 393–394. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Murray, J.H.: Why Paris Needs Hector and Lancelot Needs Mordred: Using Traditional Narrative Roles and Functions for Dramatic Compression in Interactive Narrative. In: Si, M., Thue, D., André, E., Lester, J.C., Tanenbaum, J., Zammitto, V. (eds.) ICIDS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7069, pp. 13–24. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Nichols, B.: Ideology and the image. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1981)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Portugal, J.-N.: L’avenir dira ce que nous aurons créé. In: Szilas, N., Réty, J.-H. (eds.) Création de Récits pour les Fictions Interactives: Simulation et Réalisation, pp. 133–165. Hermes & Lavoisier, Paris (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Propp, V.: Morphologie du conte. Seuil, Paris (1928)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Ryan, M.: Possible Worlds, Artificial Intelligence, and Narrative Theory. Indiana University Press, Bloomington (1991)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Sgouros, N.M.: Dynamic generation, management and resolution of interactive plots. Artificial Intelligence 107(1), 29–62 (1999)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Souriau, E.: Les deux cent mille Situations dramatiques. Flammarion, Paris (1950)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Spierling, U.: Conceiving Interactive Story Events. In: Iurgel, I.A., Zagalo, N., Petta, P. (eds.) ICIDS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5915, pp. 292–297. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Spierling, U., Szilas, N.: Authoring Issues beyond Tools. In: Iurgel, I.A., Zagalo, N., Petta, P. (eds.) ICIDS 2009. LNCS, vol. 5915, pp. 50–61. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Szilas, N.: A Computational Model of an Intelligent Narrator for Interactive Narratives. Applied Artificial Intelligence 21(8), 753–801 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Szilas, N., Marty, O., Réty, J.-H.: Authoring Highly Generative Interactive Drama. In: Balet, O., Subsol, G., Torguet, P. (eds.) ICVS 2003. LNCS, vol. 2897, pp. 37–46. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Szilas, N.: IDtension: a narrative engine for Interactive Drama. In: Göobel, S., et al. (eds.) Proceedings of the Technologies for Interactive Digital Storytelling and Entertainment (TIDSE) Conference, pp. 187–203. Fraunhofer IRB (2003)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Szilas, N.: Structural models for Interactive Drama. In: 2nd International Conference on Computational Semiotics for Games and New Media, COSIGN (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Young, R.M., et al.: An architecture for integrating plan-based behavior generation with interactive game environments. Journal of Game Development 1(1), 1–29 (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolas Szilas
    • 1
  • Urs Richle
    • 1
  • Jean E. Dumas
    • 2
  1. 1.TECFAFPSE, University of GenevaGenève 4Switzerland
  2. 2.FPSE, University of GenevaGenève 4Switzerland

Personalised recommendations