Reading Again for the First Time: A Model of Rereading in Interactive Stories

  • Alex Mitchell
  • Kevin McGee
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7648)

Abstract

When a non-interactive story is reread, the experience may change, even though the text remains the same. But what if the text is potentially different in each reading session, as is the case in an interactive story – how does rereading change in the context of interactive stories? In our earlier empirical studies of rereading we found that, surprisingly, readers of interactive stories reported that they do not feel that they are rereading until after they reach an understanding of the story, even if the story is unchanged between readings. To explain this, we propose a model of rereading in interactive stories in which readers are initially rereading to reach some form of closure. After achieving this goal, readers do feel that they are rereading, focusing on their understanding of the story as invariant. We demonstrate this model by using it to explain why inexperienced readers of Mateas and Stern’s Façade initially reread to explore the story, but quickly shift to “playing with the system”, and do not continue to reread for long.

Keywords

interactive storytelling rereading theoretical models 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Galef, D.: Observations on rereading. In: Galef, D. (ed.) Second Thoughts: a Focus on Rereading, pp. 17–33. Wayne State University Press (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mitchell, A., McGee, K.: Limits of rereadability in procedural interactive stories. In: Proc. CHI 2011, pp. 1939–1948. ACM Press (2011)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mitchell, A., McGee, K.: The paradox of rereading in hypertext fiction. In: Proc. Hypertext 2012, pp. 103–112. ACM Press (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Calinescu, M.: Rereading. Yale University Press (1993)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Aarseth, E.J.: Cybertext: Perspectives on Ergodic Literature. The Johns Hopkins University Press (1997)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bernstein, M.: Patterns of hypertext. In: Proc. Hypertext 1998, pp. 21–29. ACM Press (1998)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bernstein, M.: On hypertext narrative. In: Proc. Hypertext 2009, pp. 5–14. ACM Press (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bernstein, M., Joyce, M., Levine, D.: Contours of constructive hypertexts. In: Proc. Hypertext 1992, pp. 161–170. ACM (1992)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Selig, R.L.: The endless reading of fiction: Stuart Moulthrop’s hypertext novel ”Victory Garden”. Contemporary Literature 41(4), 642–660 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Peacock, A.: Towards an aesthetic of ’the interactive’. Digital Creativity 12(4), 237–246 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harpold, T.: Links and their vicissitudes: Essays on hypertext. PhD thesis, University of Pennsylvania (1994)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Douglas, J.Y.: The End of Books - or Books Without End? Reading Interactive Narratives. University of Michigan Press (2001)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Mateas, M.: A preliminary poetics for interactive drama and games. Digital Creativity 12(3), 140–152 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Murray, J.H.: Hamlet on the Holodeck: The Future of Narrative in Cyberspace. The MIT Press (1998)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mitchell, A.: Motivations for Rereading in Interactive Stories: A Preliminary Investigation. In: Aylett, R., Lim, M.Y., Louchart, S., Petta, P., Riedl, M. (eds.) ICIDS 2010. LNCS, vol. 6432, pp. 232–235. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mitchell, A., McGee, K.: Rereading in Interactive Stories: Constraints on Agency and Procedural Variation. In: Si, M., Thue, D., André, E., Lester, J.C., Tanenbaum, J., Zammitto, V. (eds.) ICIDS 2011. LNCS, vol. 7069, pp. 37–42. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mateas, M., Stern, A.: Procedural authorship: A case-study of the interactive drama Façade. In: Proc. Digital Arts and Culture, DAC 2005 (2005)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Magerko, B., Laird, J.E., Assanie, M., Kerfoot, A., Stokes, D.: AI characters and directors for interactive computer games. In: 16th Innovative Applications of Artificial Intelligence Conference, pp. 877–883 (2004)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Riedl, M., Young, R.: From linear story generation to branching story graphs. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications 26(3), 23–31 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Nelson, M.J., Mateas, M.: Another look at search-based drama management. In: Proc. AAMAS 2008, pp. 1293–1298 (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dow, S., Mehta, M., Harmon, E., MacIntyre, B., Mateas, M.: Presence and engagement in an interactive drama. In: Proc. CHI 2007, pp. 1475–1484. ACM Press (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Knickmeyer, R.L., Mateas, M.: Preliminary evaluation of the interactive drama Facade. In: CHI 2005 Extended Abstracts, pp. 1549–1552. ACM Press (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Milam, D., Seif El-Nasr, M., Wakkary, R.: Looking at the Interactive Narrative Experience through the Eyes of the Participants. In: Spierling, U., Szilas, N. (eds.) ICIDS 2008. LNCS, vol. 5334, pp. 96–107. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Magerko, B.: Evaluating preemptive story direction in the interactive drama architecture. Journal of Game Development 2(3), 25–52 (2007)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Ginsburg, H.P.: Entering the Child’s Mind: The Clinical Interview in Psychological Research and Practice. Cambridge University Press (1997)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Carroll, N.: Narrative closure. Philosophical Studies 135, 1–15 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Ryan, M.L.: From narrative games to playable stories: Towards a poetics of interactive narrative. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies 1, 43–59 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gerrig, R.J.: Suspense in the absence of uncertainty. Journal of Memory and Language 28(6), 633–648 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Leavitt, J., Christenfeld, N.: Story spoilers don’t spoil stories. Psychological Science 22(9), 1152–1154 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alex Mitchell
    • 1
  • Kevin McGee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Communications and New MediaNational University of SingaporeSingapore

Personalised recommendations