Laugh To Me! Implementing Emotional Escalation on Autonomous Agents for Creating a Comic Sketch

  • André Carvalho
  • António Brisson
  • Ana Paiva
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7648)

Abstract

The growing interest for Interactive Storytelling has lead the research into the exploration of this new media in classical story genres. In our research, we develop autonomous agents that act in a storytelling context with a comic purpose. We present a comic sketch model for autonomous agents with affective reasoning. The agents that use this model prepare the timing of the comic punchline by reasoning about emotional states in a process called Emotional Escalation. The punchline used for our test scenario, as well as the personality of the comic characters is based on the humour theory of incongruity-resolution.

Keywords

Autonomous Agents Humour Emotional Escalation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Binsted, K.: Machine humour: An implemented model of puns. PhD thesis, The University of Edinburgh: College of Science and Engineering: The School of Informatics (1996)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Binsted, K., Ritchie, G.: An implemented model of punning riddles. In: AAAI Proceedings of the 12th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, vol. 1, pp. 633–638 (1994)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cavazza, M., Charles, F., Mead, S.J.: Generation of humorous situations in cartoons through plan-based formalisations. In: Proceedings of CHI 2003 Workshop: Humor Modeling in the Interface (2003)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Charles, F., Mead, S.J., Cavazza, M.: Character-driven story generation in interactive storytelling. In: Proceedings 7th International Conference in Virtual Systems and Multimedia, pp. 609–615 (2001)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Dias, J., Mascarenhas, S., Paiva, A.: Fatima modular: Towards an agent architecture with a generic appraisal framework. In: Workshop in Standards in Emotion Modeling, Leiden, Netherlands (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Dias, J., Paiva, A.: Agents with Emotional Intelligence for Storytelling. In: D’Mello, S., Graesser, A., Schuller, B., Martin, J.-C. (eds.) ACII 2011, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6974, pp. 77–86. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Elliott, C.: Why boys like motorcycles: using emotion theory to find structure in humorous stories. In: EBAA 1999 Workshop on Emotion-Based Agent Architectures, at the Autonomous Agents 1999 Conference (May 1999)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Elliott, C., Brzezinski, J., Sheth, S., Salvatoriello, R.: Story-morphing in the affective reasoning paradigm: generating stories semi-automatically for use with ”emotionally intelligent” multimedia agents. In: Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Autonomous Agents, pp. 181–188 (1998)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lessard, G., Levison, M.: Computational modelling of linguistic humour: Tom swifties. In: Proceedings of the 1992 ACH/ALLC Joint Annual Conference, pp. 175–158 (1992)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lessard, G., Levison, M.: Computational modelling of riddling strategies. In: Proceedings of the 1993 ACH-ALLC Joint Annual Conference, pp. 120–122 (1993)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Louchart, S., Aylett, R.: Evaluating synthetic actors (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Louchart, S., Aylett, R.: From synthetic characters to virtual actors. In: Proceedings of the Third Artificial Intelligence and Interactive Digital Entertainment Conference (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Manurung, R., Ritchie, G., Pain, H., Waller, A., O’Mara, D., Black, R.: The construction of a pun generator for language skills development. Applied Artificial Intelligence 22(9), 841–869 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Martin, R.A.: The Psychology of Humor: An Integrative Approach. Elsevier Academic Press (2007)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Olsen, D., Mateas, M.: Beep! beep! boom!: towards a planning model of coyote and road runner cartoons. In: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Foundations of Digital Games, pp. 145–152 (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Ortony, A., Clore, G.L., Collins, A.: The Cognitive Structure of Emotions. Cambridge University Press (1988)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Perret, G.: Comedy Writing Step By Step. Writer’s Digest Books (1982)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Pizzi, D., Cavazza, M., Lugrin, J.-L.: Extending character-based storytelling with awareness and feelings. In: Proceedings of the 6th International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, pp. 12:1–12:3 (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Stock, O., Strapparava, C.: Hahacronym: a computational humor system. In: Proceedings of the ACL 2005 on Interactive Poster and Demonstration Sessions, pp. 113–116 (2005)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Thawonmas, R., Tanaka, K., Hassaku, H.: Extended Hierarchical Task Network Planning for Interactive Comedy. In: Lee, J.-H., Barley, M.W. (eds.) PRIMA 2003. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 2891, pp. 205–213. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vorhaus, J.: The Comic Toolbox: How To Be Funny Even If You’re Not. Silman-James Press (1994)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Waller, A., Black, R., O’Mara, D.A., Pain, H., Ritchie, G., Manurung, R.: Evaluating the standup pun generating software with children with cerebral palsy. ACM Transactions on Accessible Computing 1(3), 16:1–16:27 (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • André Carvalho
    • 1
  • António Brisson
    • 1
  • Ana Paiva
    • 1
  1. 1.INESC-ID and Instituto Superior TécnicoUniversidade Técnica de LisboaPorto SalvoPortugal

Personalised recommendations