Advertisement

Constraint Can Affect Human Perception, Behaviour, and Performance of Search

  • Kazuya Fujikawa
  • Hideo Joho
  • Shin’ichi Nakayama
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7634)

Abstract

Advance of search engines has removed an end-user’s constraint on search such as cost (free), operation time (fast response), language (cross-lingual), media (multimedia), and more recently, time-lag from content generation (realtime search). Consequently, we do not usually perceive strong constraint on the use of search engines. The removal of constraint is often seen as an improvement of a system’s functionality which should help people improve their search performance. However, it has also been suggested that constraint can have positive effects on people’s task performance. Therefore, we decided to study effects of search constraint on people’s perception, behaviour, and performance. Three types of constraint were investigated: time, time + number of queries one can submit, and time + number of documents one can view. A user study with 24 participants performing background search tasks suggests that 1) query and viewing constraint can increase people’s perceptional attention on query formulation and search results browsing; 2) query constraint has an effect not only on query formulation behaviour but click-through behaviour; and finally, 3) affected behaviour has medium effect on task performance. These findings warrant further studies to investigate how to leverage various forms of constraint effectively to improve human search performance.

Keywords

Search Engine User Study Search Performance Test Collection Relevance Judgement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Cohen, J.: Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences, 2nd edn. (1988)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cooper, W.S.: On selecting a measure of retrieval effectiveness. part 1. Journal of the American Society for Information Science 24, 87–100 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Fernández-Luna, J.M., Huete, J.F., MacFarlane, A., Efthimiadis, E.N.: Teaching and learning in information retrieval. Information Retrieval 12(2), 201–226 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Joho, H., Hannah, D., Jose, J.M.: Comparing collaborative and independent search in a recall-oriented task. In: Proceedings of the Second IIiX Symposium, pp. 89–96 (2008)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Joho, H., Jose, J.M.: Slicing and dicing the information space using local contexts. In: Proceedings of the First IIiX Symposium, pp. 111–126 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Junco, R., Cotten, S.R.: Perceived academic effects of instant messaging use. Computers & Education 56(2), 370–378 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kelly, D.: Methods for evaluating interactive information retrieval systems with users. Found. Trends Inf. Retr. 3, 1–224 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Kishida, K., et al.: Overview of clir task at the fifth ntcir workshop. In: Proceedings of the Fifth NTCIR Workshop Meeting (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kishida, K., et al.: Overview of clir task at the sixth ntcir workshop. In: Proceedings of the Sixth NTCIR Workshop Meeting, pp. 1–19 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Marguc, J., Kleef, G.A., Förster, J.: Stepping back while staying engaged. Social Psychological and Personality Science 3(3), 379–386 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Salton, G.: Evaluation problems in interactive information retrieval. Information Storage and Retrieval 6(1), 29–44 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Su, L.T.: Evaluation measures for interactive information retrieval. Inf. Process. Manage. 28(4), 503–516 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kazuya Fujikawa
    • 1
  • Hideo Joho
    • 2
  • Shin’ichi Nakayama
    • 2
  1. 1.Graduate School of Library, Information and Media StudiesUniversity of TsukubaJapan
  2. 2.Faculty of Library, Information and Media ScienceUniversity of TsukubaJapan

Personalised recommendations