Abstract
The Los Angeles region epitomises polycentric urban form with highly fragmented and devolved governance. For a long time, the region has been cited as an example of urban sprawl. However, its pattern of employment is not really dispersed—as expected in sprawl—but, rather, organised in many decentralised ‘employment centres’. These centres have grown and evolved over a long period. In the emerging urban form, the density gradient has multiple local maxima coincident with the employment centres. The multimodal population density function and the underlying travel demand have gradually changed the way in which people travel, and how we make transportation plans so as to accommodate such traffic demand. We are witnessing a comeback in mass transit, both in initiatives and investment. Movement of people in this car-centric region, although still heavily reliant on its extensive highway network, may well be increasingly undertaken by public transport in the near future. Is the traditional notion that Los Angeles is a low-density, car-orientated city being challenged? A history review, a contemporary analysis, and an examination of the outlook for the future might lead us to an answer.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
ABC (2010) Los Angeles crime rates hit 50-year lows. http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local/los_angeles&id=7204706
Adler S (1991) The transformation of the Pacific Electric Railway: Bradford Snell, Roger Rabbit, and the politics of transportation in Los Angeles. Urban Affairs Rev 27:51–86
Alonso W (1964) Location and land use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
American Community Survey (2009) American community survey. http://www.census.gov/acs/www
American Public Transportation Association (2011) American public transportation association. http://www.apta.com
Banham R (1971) Los Angeles: the architecture of four ecologies. Penguin Books, London
Bottles SL (1987) Los Angeles and the automobile: the making of the modern city. University of California Press, California
BTS (2003) Research and innovative technology administration’s bureau of transportation statistics. http://www.bts.gov
Cervero R (1989) Jobs-housing balance and regional mobility. J Am Planning Assoc 55:136–150
CRA (2006) Feasibility study for the resurrection of the red car trolley services in the Los Angeles downtown area (2006th edn), July 2006
Ewing R (1997) Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? J Am Planning Assoc 63:107–126
Fishman R (2000) The American metropolis at century’s end: past and future influences. Hous Policy Debate 11:199–213
Fung A, Wright EO (2003) Thinking about empowered participatory governance. Deepening democracy: institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Verso, New York, pp 3–42
Gerometta J, Häussermann H, Longo G (2005) Social innovation and civil society in urban governance: strategies for an inclusive city. Urban Stud 42:2007–2021
Giuliano G (2004) Where is the “region” in regional transportation planning? In: Wolch J, Pastor M, Dreier P (eds) Up against the sprawl: public policy and the making of Southern California. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 151–170
Giuliano G, Small KA (1991) Subcenters in the Los Angeles region. Regional Sci Urban Econ 21:163–182
Giuliano G, Small KA (1993) Is the journey to work explained by urban structure? Urban Stud 30:1458–1500
Giuliano G, Redfearn C, Agarwal A, Li C, Zhuang D (2007) Employment concentrations in Los Angeles, 1980–2000. Environ Planning A 39:2935–2957
Giuliano G, Redfearn C, Agarwal A, He S (2012) Network accessibility and employment centres. Urban Stud 48:77–95
Götz K, Deffner J (2009) Eine neue Mobilitätskultur in der Stadt—Praktische Schritte zur Veränderung. In: Bundesministerium für Verkehr (ed) Urbane Mobilität. Verkehrsforschung des Bundes für die kommunale Praxis: direkt, vol 65, pp 39–52. Bonn
Holzer H (1991) The spatial mismatch hypothesis: what has the evidence shown? Urban Stud 28:105–122
Ihlanfeldt KR, Sjoquist DL (1998) The spatial mismatch hypothesis: a review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform. Hous Policy Debate 9:849–892
Innes JE, Booher DE (2003) Collaborative policymaking: governance through dialogue. In: Hajer MA, Wagenaar H (eds) Deliberative policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 33–59
Institute for Mobility Research (2010) Mobility cultures in megacities: final report. Munich
Kenworthy JR, Laube FB (1999) Patterns of automobile dependence in cities: an international overview of key physical and economic dimensions with some implications for urban policy. Transp Res Part A 33:691–723
LAPD (2010) The Los Angeles Police Department. http://www.lapdonline.org
Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning (2012) http://planning.lacounty.gov/luz/summary/category/residential_zones
Los Angeles Times (2008) Bottleneck blog: navigating Southern California traffic, transit and trends. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/bottleneck/measure
Mees P (2010) Transport for suburbia: beyond the automobile age. Earthscan, London
Metro (2009) Long Range transportation plan. http://www.metro.ent/projects_studies/images/final-2009-LRTP.pdf
Metro (2011) Los Angeles county metropolitan transportation authority. http://www.metro.net
Neighborhood Scout (2012) Neighborhood scout. http./www.neighborhoodscout.com/ca/los-angeles/crime
Newman P, Kenworthy JR (1989) Cities and automobile dependence: an international sourcebook. Gower, Aldershot
Newman P, Kenworthy JR (2006) Urban design to reduce automobile dependence. Opolis Int J Suburban Metropolitan Stud 2: 35–52
Putnam R (1993) The prosperous community: social capital and public life. Am Prospect 13:35–42
Redfearn C (2007) The topography of metropolitan employment: identifying centers of employment in a polycentric urban area. J Urban Econ 61:519–541
Roberts I (1996) Children and sport: walking to school has future benefits. Br Med J 312:1229
Rodrigue J-P, Comtois C, Slack B (2009) The geography of transport systems. Routledge, New York
SCAG (2011) Profile of the City of Los Angeles. http://www.scag.ca.gov/resources/pdfs/2011LP/LosAngeles/LosAngeles.pdf
Shoup D (2005) The high cost of free parking. Planner’s Press, Chicago
Snell C (1974) American ground transport: a proposal for restructuring the automobile, truck, bus and rail industries. U.S. Government Print Office, Washington: a report presented to the committee of the judiciary, subcommittee on antitrust and monopoly, United States Senate, 26 Feb 1974
Taylor B (2004) The geography of urban transportation finance. In: Hanson S, Giuliano G (eds) The geography of urban transportation. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 294–331
Texas Transportation Institute (2009) Urban mobility report. http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/ums/mobility_report_2009_wappx.pdf
Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Popkin BM (2001) Active commuting to school: an overlooked source of children’s physical activity. Sports Med 31:309–313
US Census Bureau (2010) US Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov
US Department of Transportation (USDOT) (2009) 2009 National household travel survey
Wilson R (1995) Suburban parking requirements: a tacit policy for automobile use and sprawl. J Am Planning Assoc 61:29–42
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
He, S.Y. (2013). Los Angeles: A Transit Metropolis in the Making?. In: Megacity Mobility Culture. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34735-1_9
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34735-1_9
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34734-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34735-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)