Skip to main content

Los Angeles: A Transit Metropolis in the Making?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Megacity Mobility Culture

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Mobility ((LNMOB))

  • 2178 Accesses

Abstract

The Los Angeles region epitomises polycentric urban form with highly fragmented and devolved governance. For a long time, the region has been cited as an example of urban sprawl. However, its pattern of employment is not really dispersed—as expected in sprawl—but, rather, organised in many decentralised ‘employment centres’. These centres have grown and evolved over a long period. In the emerging urban form, the density gradient has multiple local maxima coincident with the employment centres. The multimodal population density function and the underlying travel demand have gradually changed the way in which people travel, and how we make transportation plans so as to accommodate such traffic demand. We are witnessing a comeback in mass transit, both in initiatives and investment. Movement of people in this car-centric region, although still heavily reliant on its extensive highway network, may well be increasingly undertaken by public transport in the near future. Is the traditional notion that Los Angeles is a low-density, car-orientated city being challenged? A history review, a contemporary analysis, and an examination of the outlook for the future might lead us to an answer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. ABC (2010) Los Angeles crime rates hit 50-year lows. http://abclocal.go.com/kabc/story?section=news/local/los_angeles&id=7204706

  2. Adler S (1991) The transformation of the Pacific Electric Railway: Bradford Snell, Roger Rabbit, and the politics of transportation in Los Angeles. Urban Affairs Rev 27:51–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Alonso W (1964) Location and land use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  4. American Community Survey (2009) American community survey. http://www.census.gov/acs/www

  5. American Public Transportation Association (2011) American public transportation association. http://www.apta.com

  6. Banham R (1971) Los Angeles: the architecture of four ecologies. Penguin Books, London

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bottles SL (1987) Los Angeles and the automobile: the making of the modern city. University of California Press, California

    Google Scholar 

  8. BTS (2003) Research and innovative technology administration’s bureau of transportation statistics. http://www.bts.gov

  9. Cervero R (1989) Jobs-housing balance and regional mobility. J Am Planning Assoc 55:136–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. CRA (2006) Feasibility study for the resurrection of the red car trolley services in the Los Angeles downtown area (2006th edn), July 2006

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ewing R (1997) Is Los Angeles-style sprawl desirable? J Am Planning Assoc 63:107–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fishman R (2000) The American metropolis at century’s end: past and future influences. Hous Policy Debate 11:199–213

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fung A, Wright EO (2003) Thinking about empowered participatory governance. Deepening democracy: institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. Verso, New York, pp 3–42

    Google Scholar 

  14. Gerometta J, Häussermann H, Longo G (2005) Social innovation and civil society in urban governance: strategies for an inclusive city. Urban Stud 42:2007–2021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Giuliano G (2004) Where is the “region” in regional transportation planning? In: Wolch J, Pastor M, Dreier P (eds) Up against the sprawl: public policy and the making of Southern California. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis, pp 151–170

    Google Scholar 

  16. Giuliano G, Small KA (1991) Subcenters in the Los Angeles region. Regional Sci Urban Econ 21:163–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Giuliano G, Small KA (1993) Is the journey to work explained by urban structure? Urban Stud 30:1458–1500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Giuliano G, Redfearn C, Agarwal A, Li C, Zhuang D (2007) Employment concentrations in Los Angeles, 1980–2000. Environ Planning A 39:2935–2957

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Giuliano G, Redfearn C, Agarwal A, He S (2012) Network accessibility and employment centres. Urban Stud 48:77–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Götz K, Deffner J (2009) Eine neue Mobilitätskultur in der Stadt—Praktische Schritte zur Veränderung. In: Bundesministerium für Verkehr (ed) Urbane Mobilität. Verkehrsforschung des Bundes für die kommunale Praxis: direkt, vol 65, pp 39–52. Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  21. Holzer H (1991) The spatial mismatch hypothesis: what has the evidence shown? Urban Stud 28:105–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ihlanfeldt KR, Sjoquist DL (1998) The spatial mismatch hypothesis: a review of recent studies and their implications for welfare reform. Hous Policy Debate 9:849–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Innes JE, Booher DE (2003) Collaborative policymaking: governance through dialogue. In: Hajer MA, Wagenaar H (eds) Deliberative policy analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 33–59

    Google Scholar 

  24. Institute for Mobility Research (2010) Mobility cultures in megacities: final report. Munich

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kenworthy JR, Laube FB (1999) Patterns of automobile dependence in cities: an international overview of key physical and economic dimensions with some implications for urban policy. Transp Res Part A 33:691–723

    Google Scholar 

  26. LAPD (2010) The Los Angeles Police Department. http://www.lapdonline.org

  27. Los Angeles County Department of Regional Planning (2012) http://planning.lacounty.gov/luz/summary/category/residential_zones

  28. Los Angeles Times (2008) Bottleneck blog: navigating Southern California traffic, transit and trends. http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/bottleneck/measure

  29. Mees P (2010) Transport for suburbia: beyond the automobile age. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  30. Metro (2009) Long Range transportation plan. http://www.metro.ent/projects_studies/images/final-2009-LRTP.pdf

  31. Metro (2011) Los Angeles county metropolitan transportation authority. http://www.metro.net

  32. Neighborhood Scout (2012) Neighborhood scout. http./www.neighborhoodscout.com/ca/los-angeles/crime

  33. Newman P, Kenworthy JR (1989) Cities and automobile dependence: an international sourcebook. Gower, Aldershot

    Google Scholar 

  34. Newman P, Kenworthy JR (2006) Urban design to reduce automobile dependence. Opolis Int J Suburban Metropolitan Stud 2: 35–52

    Google Scholar 

  35. Putnam R (1993) The prosperous community: social capital and public life. Am Prospect 13:35–42

    Google Scholar 

  36. Redfearn C (2007) The topography of metropolitan employment: identifying centers of employment in a polycentric urban area. J Urban Econ 61:519–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Roberts I (1996) Children and sport: walking to school has future benefits. Br Med J 312:1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Rodrigue J-P, Comtois C, Slack B (2009) The geography of transport systems. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  39. SCAG (2011) Profile of the City of Los Angeles. http://www.scag.ca.gov/resources/pdfs/2011LP/LosAngeles/LosAngeles.pdf

  40. Shoup D (2005) The high cost of free parking. Planner’s Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  41. Snell C (1974) American ground transport: a proposal for restructuring the automobile, truck, bus and rail industries. U.S. Government Print Office, Washington: a report presented to the committee of the judiciary, subcommittee on antitrust and monopoly, United States Senate, 26 Feb 1974

    Google Scholar 

  42. Taylor B (2004) The geography of urban transportation finance. In: Hanson S, Giuliano G (eds) The geography of urban transportation. The Guilford Press, New York, pp 294–331

    Google Scholar 

  43. Texas Transportation Institute (2009) Urban mobility report. http://tti.tamu.edu/documents/ums/mobility_report_2009_wappx.pdf

  44. Tudor-Locke C, Ainsworth BE, Popkin BM (2001) Active commuting to school: an overlooked source of children’s physical activity. Sports Med 31:309–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. US Census Bureau (2010) US Census Bureau. http://www.census.gov

  46. US Department of Transportation (USDOT) (2009) 2009 National household travel survey

    Google Scholar 

  47. Wilson R (1995) Suburban parking requirements: a tacit policy for automobile use and sprawl. J Am Planning Assoc 61:29–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

He, S.Y. (2013). Los Angeles: A Transit Metropolis in the Making?. In: Megacity Mobility Culture. Lecture Notes in Mobility. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34735-1_9

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics