Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNAI,volume 7654))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 1101 Accesses

Abstract

This work focuses on investigating the importance of evaluating the likelihood that a particular collaboration option is going to be profitable for a firm. Some collaboration options for a firm are first evaluated by experts on previously agreed upon criteria. Methods from rough set theory are afterwords employed for ordering of the agreed upon criteria with respect to their significance in predicting collaboration outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Belnap, N.J.: How a computer should think. In: Contemporary Aspects of Philosophy. Proceedings of the Oxford International Symposia, Oxford, GB, pp. 30–56 (1975)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Davey, B.A., Priestley, H.A.: Introduction to lattices and order. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  3. Duntsch, I., Gediga, G.: Rough set data analysis: A road to non-invasive knowledge discovery. Methods Publishers (2000) ISBN: 190328001X

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fitting, M.: Kleene’s Logic, Generalized. Journal of Logic and Computation 1(6), 797–810 (1991)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Font, J.M., Moussavi, M.: Note on a six valued extension of three valued logics. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 3, 173–187 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Garcia, O.N., Moussavi, M.: A Six-Valued Logic for Representing Incomplete Knowledge. In: Proceedings of the 20th International Symposium on Multiple-Valued Logic (ISMVL), pp. 110–114. IEEE Computer Society Press, Charlotte (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  7. García-Duque, J., López-Nores, M., Pazos-Arias, J., Fernández-Vilas, A., Díaz-Redondo, R., Gil-Solla, A., Blanco-Fernández, Y., Ramos-Cabrer, M.: A Six-valued Logic to Reason about Uncertainty and Inconsistency in Requirements Specifications. Journal of Logic and Computation 16(2), 227–255 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Kaluzhny, Y., Muravitsky, A.Y.: A knowledge representation based on the Belnap’s four valued logic. Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 3, 189–203 (1993)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Kleene, S.: Introduction to Metamathematics. D. Van Nostrand Co., Inc., New York (1952)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Lukasiewicz, J.: On Three-Valued Logic. Ruch Filozoficzny 5 (1920), English translation in Borkowski, L. (ed.): Lukasiewicz, J.: 1970, Selected Works. North Holland, Amsterdam (1920)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Moussavi, M., Garcia, O.N.: A Six-Valued Logic and Its Application to Artificial Intelligence. In: Proceedings of the Fifth Southeastern Logic Symposium (1989)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets. International Journal of Computer and Information Sciences 11, 341–356 (1982)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Pawlak, Z.: Rough Sets: Theoretical Aspects of Reasoning about Data, vol. 9. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (1991)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Bierman, H., Smidt, S.: The Capital Budgeting Decision. Routledge, New York (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Klein, G.A.: Recognition-Primed Decision Making. In: Klein, G.A. (ed.) Sources of Power: How People Make Decisions, pp. 15–30. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Layard, R., Glaister, S.: Cost-Benefit Analysis, 2nd edn. Cambridge University Press (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Nas, T.F.: Cost-benefit Analysis, Theory and Application. Sage Publications (1996)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Sim, K.M.: Bilattices and Reasoning in Artificial Intelligence: Concepts and Foundations. Artificial Intelligence Review 15(3), 219–240 (2001)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Zirger, B.J., Maidique, M.: A model of new product development: an empirical test. Management Science 36, 867–883 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wagner, G.: Vivid Logic. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 764. Springer, Heidelberg (1994)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Encheva, S. (2012). Ordering of Potential Collaboration Options. In: Nguyen, NT., Hoang, K., Jȩdrzejowicz, P. (eds) Computational Collective Intelligence. Technologies and Applications. ICCCI 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7654. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34707-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34707-8_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34706-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34707-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics