Adapting to Natural Rating Acquisition with Combined Active Learning Strategies
The accuracy of collaborative-filtering recommender systems largely depends on the quantity and quality of the ratings added to the system over time. Active learning (AL) aims to improve the quality of ratings by selectively finding and soliciting the most informative ratings. However previous AL techniques have been evaluated assuming a rather artificial scenario: where AL is the only source of rating acquisition. However, users do frequently rate items on their own, without being prompted by the AL algorithms (natural acquisition). In this paper we show that different AL strategies work better under different conditions, and adding naturally acquired ratings changes these conditions and may result in a decreased effectiveness for some of them. While we are unable to control the naturally occurring changes in conditions, we should adaptively select the AL strategies which are well suited for the conditions at hand. We show that choosing AL strategies adaptively outperforms any of the individual AL strategies.
KeywordsRecommender systems active learning combined-strategies rating elicitation
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- 2.Carenini, G., Smith, J., Poole, D.: Towards more conversational and collaborative recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 2003 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Miami, FL, USA, January 12-15, pp. 12–18 (2003)Google Scholar
- 4.Golbandi, N., Koren, Y., Lempel, R.: Adaptive bootstrapping of recommender systems using decision trees. In: Proceedings of the Forth International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining, WSDM 2011, Hong Kong, China, February 9-12, pp. 595–604 (2011)Google Scholar
- 5.Koren, Y., Bell, R.: Advances in collaborative filtering. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 145–186. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
- 6.Lathia, N.K.: Evaluating Collaborative Filtering Over Time. PhD thesis, University College London (June 2010)Google Scholar
- 7.Rashid, A.M., Albert, I., Cosley, D., Lam, S.K., Mcnee, S.M., Konstan, J.A., Riedl, J.: Getting to know you: Learning new user preferences in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the 2002 International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, IUI 2002, pp. 127–134. ACM Press (2002)Google Scholar
- 9.Rubens, N., Kaplan, D., Sugiyama, M.: Active learning in recommender systems. In: Ricci, F., Rokach, L., Shapira, B., Kantor, P. (eds.) Recommender Systems Handbook, pp. 735–767. Springer (2011)Google Scholar
- 11.Zhou, K., Yang, S.-H., Zha, H.: Functional matrix factorizations for cold-start recommendation. In: Proceeding of the 34th International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, SIGIR 2011, Beijing, China, July 25-29, pp. 315–324 (2011)Google Scholar