Advertisement

Requirements Viewpoint

  • Marian Daun
  • Bastian Tenbergen
  • Thorsten Weyer
Chapter

Abstract

The requirements viewpoint comprises the part of the SPES modeling framework that primarily deals with the accurate, complete, and consistent specification of system requirements.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    [Alfaro and Henziger 2001] L. de Alfaro, T. A. Henzinger: Interface automata. In: Proceedings of the 8th European Software Engineering Conference ESEC/FSE-9, 2001.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    [Braun et al. 2010] P. Braun, M. Broy, F. Houdek, M. Kirchmayr, M. Müller, B. Penzenstadler, K. Pohl, T. Weyer: Guiding requirements engineering for softwareintensive embedded systems in the automotive industry. Computer Science - Research and Development. DOI: 10.1007/s00450-010-0136-y, 2010.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    [Cockburn 2001] A. Cockburn: Writing Effective Use Cases. Addison-Wesley, 2001.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    [Davis 1993] A. M. Davis: Software Requirements – Objects, Functions, States. 2nd Edition, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1993.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    [Hammond et al. 2001] J. Hammond, R. Rawlings, A. Hall: Will it work? In: Proceedings of the 5th IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE’01), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, 2001, pp. 102-109.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    [ITU 2004] International Telecommunication Union: ITU-T Z.120: Message Sequence Chart (MSC), 2004.Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    [Jarke and Pohl 1994] M. Jarke, K. Pohl: Requirements engineering in the year 2001 – (Virtually) managing a changing reality. Software Engineering Journal, Vol. 9, No. 6, 1994, pp. 257-266.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    [Lamsweerde 2009] A. van Lamsweerde: Requirements Engineering – From System Goals to UML Models to Software Specifications. Wiley, West Sussex, 2009.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    [Leveson 2000] N. Leveson: Intent specifications – An approach to building humancentered specifications. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, Vol. 26, No. 1, 2000, pp. 15-35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    [Lynch and Tuttle 1989] N. A. Lynch, M. R. Tuttle: An introduction to input/output automata. CWI Quarterly, Vol. 2, 1989, pp. 219-246.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    [McMenamin and Palmer 1984] S. M. McMenamin, J. F. Palmer: Essential Systems Analysis. Prentice Hall, London, 1984.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    [OMG 2010a] Object Management Group: OMG Systems Modeling Language™ (OMG SysML) Language Specification v1.2. OMG Document Number: formal/2010-06-02.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    [OMG 2010b] Object Management Group: OMG Unified Modeling Language™ (OMG UML), Infrastructure v2.3. OMG Document Number: formal/2010-05-03.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    [Pohl 2010] K. Pohl: Requirements Engineering – Fundamentals, Principles, Techniques. Springer, Germany, 2010.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    [Potts 1995] C. Potts: Using schematic scenarios to understand user needs. In: Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on Designing Interactive Systems – Processes, Practices, Methods and Techniques (DIS’95). ACM, New York, 1995, pp. 247-266.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    [Reisig 1991] W. Reisig: Petri nets and algebraic specifications. Theoretical Computer Science, Vol. 80, No 1, 1991, pp. 1-34.MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    [Weyer 2011] T. Weyer: Kohärenzprüfung von Anforderungsspezifikationen: Ein Ansatz zur Prüfung der Kohärenz von Verhaltensspezifikationen gegen Eigenschaften des operationellen Kontexts. Südwestdeutscher Verlag für Hochschulschriften, 2011.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    [Yu 1997] E. Yu: Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering (RE’97), IEEE Computer Society Press, Los Alamitos, 1997, pp. 226-235.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marian Daun
    • 1
  • Bastian Tenbergen
    • 1
  • Thorsten Weyer
    • 1
  1. 1.paluno – The Ruhr Institute for Software TechnologyUniversity of Duisburg-EssenEssenGermany

Personalised recommendations