Practical Challenges of Enterprise Modeling in the Light of Business and IT Alignment

  • Julia Kaidalova
  • Ulf Seigerroth
  • Tomasz Kaczmarek
  • Nikolay Shilov
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 134)

Abstract

The need to reduce a gap between organizational context and technology within enterprise has been recognized and discussed by both researchers and practitioners. In order to solve this problem it is required to capture and analyze both business and IT dimensions of enterprise operation. In this regard, Enterprise Modeling is currently considered as widely used and powerful tool that enables and facilitates alignment of business with IT. The central role of EM process is EM practitioner - a person who facilitates and drives EM project towards successful achievement of its goals. Conducting EM is a highly collaborative and nontrivial process that requires considerable skills and experience since there are various challenges to manage and to deal with during the whole EM project. Despite quite wide range of related research, the question of EM challenges needs further investigation, in particular concerning the viewpoint of EM practitioners. Thus, the purpose of this paper is to identify challenges that EM practitioners usually face during their modeling efforts taking into consideration potential influence of these challenges on successful conduct of EM and on alignment of Business and IT thereafter.

Keywords

Enterprise Modeling Business and IT Alignment EM practical challenges 

References

  1. 1.
    Stirna, J., Persson, A.: Anti-patterns as a Means of Focusing on Critical Quality Aspects in Enterprise Modeling. In: Halpin, T., Krogstie, J., Nurcan, S., Proper, E., Schmidt, R., Soffer, P., Ukor, R. (eds.) BPMDS 2009 and EMMSAD 2009. LNBIP, vol. 29, pp. 407–418. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Stirna, J., Kirikova, M.: Integrating Agile Modeling with Participative Enterprise Modeling. In: The Proceedings of the CAiSE Workshop EMMSAD, pp. 171–184 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Seigerroth, U.: Enterprise Modelling and Enterprise Architecture: the constituents of transformation and alignment of Business and IT. International Journal of IT/Business Alignment and Governance (IJITBAG) 2 (2011) ISSN 1947-9611Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Wegmann, A., Regev, R., Loison, B.: Business and IT Alignment with SEAM, REBNITA, RE05, France (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chan, Y.E., Reich, B.H.: IT alignment: what have we learned? Journal of Information Technology 22, 297–315 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Luftman, J., McLean, E.R.: Key issues for IT executives. MIS Quarterly Executive 3(2), 89–104 (2004)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Grant, G.G.: Strategic alignment and enterprise systems implementation: the case of Metalco. Journal of Information Technology 18, 159–175 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Holland, C.P., Light, B.: A Framework for Understanding Success and Failure in Enterprise Resource Planning System Implementation. In: Shanks, G., Seddon, P.B., Willcocks, L.P. (eds.) Second-Wave Enterprise Resource Planning Systems – Implementing for Effectiveness, pp. 180–195. Cambridge University Press (2003)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Barjis, J.: Collaborative, Participative and Interactive Enterprise Modeling. In: Filipe, J., Cordeiro, J. (eds.) ICEIS 2009. LNBIP, vol. 24, pp. 651–662. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Persson, A., Stirna, J.: Towards Defining a Competence Profile for the Enterprise Modeling Practitioner. In: van Bommel, P., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Overbeek, S., Proper, E., Barjis, J. (eds.) PoEM 2010. LNBIP, vol. 68, pp. 232–245. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Rosemann, M., Lind, M., Hjalmarsson, A., Recker, J.: Four facets of a process modeling facilitator. In: Thirty Second International Conference on Information Systems, Shanghai (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Bandara, W., Gable, G.G., Rosemann, M.: Factors and Measures of Business Process Modelling: Model Building Through a Multiple Case Study. European Journal of Information Systems 4(14), 347–360 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kaczmarek, T., Seigerroth, U., Shilov, N.: Multi-layered enterprise modeling and its challenges in business and IT alignment. International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems (2012)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Orlikowski, W.J., Hofman, J.D.: An improvisational model for change management: the case of groupware. Sloan Management Science 38(2), 11–21 (1997)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gibson, C.F.: IT-enabled Business Change: An Approach to Understanding and Managing Risk. MIS Quarterly Executive 2(2) (September 2003)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Stirna, J., Persson, A., Sandkuhl, K.: Participative Enterprise Modeling: Experiences and Recommendations. In: Krogstie, J., Opdahl, A.L., Sindre, G. (eds.) CAiSE 2007. LNCS, vol. 4495, pp. 546–560. Springer, Heidelberg (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Indulska, M., Recker, J., Rosemann, M., Green, P.: Business Process Modeling: Current Issues and Future Challenges. In: van Eck, P., Gordijn, J., Wieringa, R. (eds.) CAiSE 2009. LNCS, vol. 5565, pp. 501–514. Springer, Heidelberg (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Delen, D., Dalal, N.P., Benjamin, P.C.: Integrated modeling: the key to holistic understanding of the enterprise. Communications of the ACM 48(4), 107–112 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Rosemann, M., Sedera, W., Gable, G.G.: Critical Success Factors of Process Modelling for Enterprise Systems. In: Proceedings of the Americas Conference of Information Systems (AMCIS 2001), Boston, Massachusetts, August 3-5 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Julia Kaidalova
    • 1
  • Ulf Seigerroth
    • 1
  • Tomasz Kaczmarek
    • 2
  • Nikolay Shilov
    • 3
  1. 1.School of EngineeringJönköping UniversityJönköpingSweden
  2. 2.Department of Information SystemssPoznan University of EconomicPoznanPoland
  3. 3.St.Petersburg Institute for Informatics and Automation of the Russian Academy of SciencesSt.PetersburgRussia

Personalised recommendations