Abstract
Some considerations should be taken into account to facilitate the clinical application of a robotic device. The basis for the development should not be limited to the scientific concept and the technical feasibility. Practical input from patients and therapists adds important features relevant for daily practice. The informal knowledge exchange warrants successful developments and implementation.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Colombo, G., Wirz, M., Dietz, V.: Driven gait orthosis for improvement of locomotor training in paraplegic patients. Spinal Cord 39(5), 252–255 (2001)
Bolliger, M., Banz, R., Dietz, V., Lunenburger, L.: Standardized voluntary force measurement in a lower extremity rehabilitation robot. J. Neuroeng. Rehabil. 5, 23 (2008)
Wirz, M., Zemon, D.H., Rupp, R., Scheel, A., Colombo, G., Dietz, V., et al.: Effectiveness of automated locomotor training in patients with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: a multicenter trial. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 86(4), 672–680 (2005)
Krakauer, J.W.: Motor learning: its relevance to stroke recovery and neurorehabilitation. Current Opinion in Neurology 19(1), 84–90 (2006)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg
About this paper
Cite this paper
Wirz, M., Rupp, R. (2013). Clinical Application of a Robotic Device for Locomotion. In: Pons, J., Torricelli, D., Pajaro, M. (eds) Converging Clinical and Engineering Research on Neurorehabilitation. Biosystems & Biorobotics, vol 1. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34546-3_159
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34546-3_159
Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg
Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34545-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34546-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)