Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Mixed-Methods-Designs

  • Chapter
Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften für Bachelor

Part of the book series: Springer-Lehrbuch ((SLB))

Zusammenfassung

Im Zuge der zunehmenden Verwendung von Mixed-Methods-Designs wurden vielfach Vorschläge zur Systematisierung der verschiedenen Designvarianten vorgelegt. Im Folgenden sollen zunächst einige ausgewählte Systematisierungsvorschläge für Mixed- Methods- und Mixed-Model-Designs dargestellt werden, die zugleich Kriterien einer Methodenkombination verdeutlichen. Anschließend werden einige ausgewählte Designs anhand von Beispielen näher erläutert (◘ Abb. 10.1).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Weiterführende Literatur

  • Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (1998).Mixed methodology. Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J.W. & Plano Clark, V.L. (2011).Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreier, M. & Odag, ö. (2010). Mixed methods. In G. Mey & K. Mruck (Hrsg.),Handbuch Qualitative Forschung in der Psychologie (S. 263–277). Wiesbaden: VS Verlag für Sozialwissenschaften.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T. & Groll, S. (2005). Audience-tuning effects on memory: The role of shared reality.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 257–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schreier, M. & Fielding, N. (Eds.) (2001). Qualitative and quantitative research: conjunctions and divergencies.Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung (FQS), 2, 1. Available at: http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/issue/view/26 [Date of Access: July 20, 2012]

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (2010). (Eds.).Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research(2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Literatur

  • Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and conducting mixed methods research (2. Aufl.). Thousand Oaks: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • Echterhoff, G., Higgins, E. T. & Groll, S. (2005). Audience-tuning effects on memory: The role of shared reality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 257–276.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Groeben, N. & Scheele, B. (1984). Produktion und Rezeption von Ironie. Pragmalinguistische Beschreibung und psycholinguistische Erklärungshypothesen. Tübingen: Narr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. (1981). The »communication game«: Implications for social cognition and persuasion. In E. T. Higgins, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Social cognition: The Ontario symposium (Vol. 1, pp. 343–392). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Higgins, E. T. & Rholes, W. S. (1978). »Saying-is-Believing«: Effects of message modification on memory and liking for the person described. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 14, 363–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Igo, L. B., Kiewra, K. A. & Bruning, R. (2008). Individual differences and intervention flaws: A sequential exploratory study of college students’ copy-and-paste note taking. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 2, 149–168.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maxwell, J. A. & Loomis, D. M. (2003). Mixed methods design: An alternative approach. In A. Tashakkori & C. Teddlie (Eds.), Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioural research (pp. 241–272). Thousand Oaks: Sage

    Google Scholar 

  • McCann, C. D. & Higgins, E. T. (1992). Personal and contextual factors in communication: A review of the »communication game «. In G. R. Semin & K. Fiedler (Eds.), Language, interaction and social cognition (pp. 144–171). London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morse, J. M. (1991). Approaches to qualitative-quantitative methodological triangulation. Nursing Research, 40(2), 120–123.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Odag, Ö. (2007). Wenn Männer von der Liebe lesen und Frauen von Abenteuern… Eine empirische Rezeptionsstudie zur emotionalen Beteiligung von Männern und Frauen beim Lesen narrativer Texte. Lengerich: Pabst.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, A., Day, J., Randall, F. & Bentall, R.P. (2003). Patients’ understanding and participation in a trial designed to improve the management of antipsychotic medication. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 38, 720–728.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teddlie, C. & Tashakkori, C. (2009). Foundations of mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tashakkori, A. & Teddlie, C. (1998). Mixed methodology. Combining qualitative and quantitative approaches. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Authors
  1. Margrit Schreier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gerald Echterhoff
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Schreier, M., Echterhoff, G. (2013). Mixed-Methods-Designs. In: Forschungsmethoden in Psychologie und Sozialwissenschaften für Bachelor. Springer-Lehrbuch. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34362-9_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation