Investigating Perceptual Features for a Natural Human - Humanoid Robot Interaction Inside a Spontaneous Setting

  • Hiroshi Ishiguro
  • Shuichi Nishio
  • Antonio Chella
  • Rosario Sorbello
  • Giuseppe Balistreri
  • Marcello Giardina
  • Carmelo Calí
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 196)

Abstract

The present paper aims to validate our research on human-humanoid interaction (HHI) using the minimalistic humanoid robot Telenoid. We have conducted human-robot interactions test with 100 young people with no prior interaction experience with this robot. The main goal is the analysis of the two social dimension (perception and believability) useful for increasing the natural behavior between users and Telenoid. We administrated our custom questionnaire to these subjects after a well defined experimental setting (ordinary and goal-guided task). After the analysis of the questionnaires, we obtained the proof that perceptual and believability conditions are necessary social dimensions for a successfully and efficiency HHI interaction in every daylife activities.

Keywords

Telenoid Geminoid Social Robot Human-Humanoid Robot Interaction 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Balistreri, G., Nishio, S., Sorbello, R., Ishiguro, H.: Integrating Built-in Sensors of an Android with Sensors Embedded in the Environment for Studying a More Natural Human-Robot Interaction. In: Pirrone, R., Sorbello, F. (eds.) AI*IA 2011. LNCS, vol. 6934, pp. 432–437. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ishiguro, H., Nishio, S., Chella, A., Sorbello, R., Balistreri, G., Giardina, M., Calí, C.: Perceptual Social Dimensions of Human - Humanoid Robot Interaction. In: Lee, S., Cho, H., Yoon, K.-J., Lee, J. (eds.) Intelligent Autonomous Systems 12. AISC, vol. 194, pp. 409–421. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Balistreri, G., Nishio, S., Sorbello, R., Chella, A., Ishiguro, H.: Natural human robot meta-communication through the integration of android’s sensors with environment embedded sensors. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 233, pp. 26–37. IOS Press (2011)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chella, A., Lebiere, C., Noelle, D., Samsonovich, A.: On a roadmap to biologically inspired cognitive agents. Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence and Applications, vol. 233, pp. 453–460. IOS Press (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kanda, T., Miyashita, T., Osada, T., Haikawa, Y., Ishiguro, H.: Analysis of humanoid appearances in human–robot interaction. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 24(3), 725–735 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Oztop, E., Franklin, D., Chaminade, T., Cheng, G.: Human-humanoid interaction: is a humanoid robot perceived as a human? International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 2(4), 537 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Poel, M., Heylen, D., Nijholt, A., Meulemans, M., Van Breemen, A.: Gaze behaviour, believability, likability and the icat. AI & Society 24(1), 61–73 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Metta, G., Sandini, G., Vernon, D., Natale, L., Nori, F.: The icub humanoid robot: an open platform for research in embodied cognition. In: Proceedings of the 8th Workshop on Performance Metrics for Intelligent Systems, pp. 50–56. ACM (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ishiguro, H.: Android science–toward a new cross-interdisciplinary framework. Robotics Research 28, 118–127 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Kanda, T., Ishiguro, H., Ono, T., Imai, M., Nakatsu, R.: Development and evaluation of an interactive humanoid robot robovie. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2002, vol. 2, pp. 1848–1855. IEEE (2002)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Shimada, M., Minato, T., Itakura, S., Ishiguro, H.: Evaluation of android using unconscious recognition. In: 2006 6th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 157–162. IEEE (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Argyle, M., Dean, J.: Eye-contact, distance and affiliation. Sociometry, 289–304 (1965)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Argyle, M., Cook, M.: Gaze and mutual gaze (1976)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Argyle, M., Ingham, R., Alkema, F., McCallin, M.: The different functions of gaze. Semiotica 7(1), 19–32 (1973)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Durlach, N., Slater, M.: Presence in shared virtual environments and virtual togetherness. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 9(2), 214–217 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhao, S.: Toward a taxonomy of copresence. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 12(5), 445–455 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Slater, M., Sadagic, A., Usoh, M., Schroeder, R.: Small-group behavior in a virtual and real environment: A comparative study. Presence: Teleoperators & Virtual Environments 9(1), 37–51 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Goffman, E.: Behavior in public places: Notes on the social organization of gatherings. Free Pr. (1966)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Dautenhahn, K.: The art of designing socially intelligent agents: Science, fiction, and the human in the loop. Applied Artificial Intelligence 12(7-8), 573–617 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Biocca, F.: Communication within virtual reality: Creating a space for research. Journal of Communication 42(4), 5–22 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Hiroshi Ishiguro
    • 1
    • 2
  • Shuichi Nishio
    • 2
  • Antonio Chella
    • 3
  • Rosario Sorbello
    • 3
  • Giuseppe Balistreri
    • 3
  • Marcello Giardina
    • 3
  • Carmelo Calí
    • 4
  1. 1.Graduate School of Engineering ScienceOsaka UniversityOsakaJapan
  2. 2.ATR Intelligent Robotics and Communication LaboratoryKyotoJapan
  3. 3.DICGIM, RoboticsLabUniversitá di PalermoPalermoItaly
  4. 4.Dipartimento FIERI-AGLAIAUniversitá di PalermoPalermoItaly

Personalised recommendations