Characterizing and Assessing Human-Like Behavior in Cognitive Architectures

  • Raúl Arrabales
  • Agapito Ledezma
  • Araceli Sanchis
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 196)

Abstract

The Turing Test is usually seen as the ultimate goal of Strong Artificial Intelligence (Strong AI). Mainly because of two reasons: first, it is assumed that if we can build a machine that is indistinguishable from a human is because we have completely discovered how a human mind is created; second, such an intelligent machine could replace or collaborate with humans in any imaginable complex task. Furthermore, if such a machine existed it would probably surpass humans in many complex tasks (both physically and cognitively). But do we really need such a machine? Is it possible to build such a system in the short-term? Do we have to settle for the now classical narrow AI approaches? Isn’t there a more reasonable medium term challenge that AI community should aim at? In this paper, we use the paradigmatic Turing test to discuss the implications of aiming too high in the AI research arena; we analyze key factors involved in the design and implementation of variants of the Turing test and we also propose a medium term plausible agenda towards the effective development of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) from the point of view of artificial cognitive architectures.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adolphs, R.: How do we know the minds of others? Domain-specificity, simulation, and enactive social cognition. Brain Research 1079(1), 25–35 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahn, L.V., Blum, M., Hopper, N.J., Langford, J.: CAPTCHA: Using Hard AI Problems for Security. In: Biham, E. (ed.) EUROCRYPT 2003. LNCS, vol. 2656, pp. 294–311. Springer, Heidelberg (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Arrabales, R., Ledezma, A., Sanchis, A.: ConsScale FPS: Cognitive Integration for Improved Believability in Computer Game Bots. In: Believable Bots. Springer (2011a)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arrabales, R., Muñoz, J., Ledezma, A., Sanchis, A.: A Machine Consciousness Approach to the Design of human-like bots. In: Believable Bots Springer (2011b)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Arrabales, R., Ledezma, A., Sanchis, A.: ConsScale: A Pragmatic Scale for Measuring the Level of Consciousness in Artificial Agents. Journal of Consciousness Studies 17(3-4), 131–164 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Arrabales, R., Ledezma, A., Sanchis, A.: Assessing and Characterizing the Cognitive Power of Machine Consciousness Implementations. In: Biologically Inspired Cognitive Architectures II. AAAI Fall Symposium Series, p. 16 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Becchio, C., Bertone, C.: Beyond Cartesian Subjectivism: Neural Correlates of Shared Intentionality. Journal of Consciousness Studies 12(7), 20–30 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Boden, M.A.: Mind as Machine: A History of Cognitive Science. Oxford University Press, NY (2006)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Colby, K.M.: Modeling a paranoid mind. Behavioral and Brain Sciences 4(04), 515 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freeman, W.J.: The Neurodynamics of Intentionality in Animal Brains Provide a Basis for Constructing Devices that are Capable of Intelligent Behavior. In: NIST Workshop on Metrics for Intelligence: Development of Criteria for Machine Intelligence. National Institute of Standards and Technology (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Gallese, V., Goldman, A.: Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 2(12), 493–501 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Haikonen, P.O.A.: Reflections of Consciousness: The Mirror Test. In: Proceedings of the 2007 AAAI Fall Symposium on Consciousness and Artificial Intelligence, pp. 67–71 (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Harnad, S.: The Turing Test is not a trick: Turing indistinguishability is a scientific criterion. SIGART Bull. 3(4), 9–10 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Harnad, S., Scherzer, P.: First, scale up to the robotic Turing test, then worry about feeling. Artificial Intelligence in Medicine 44(2), 83 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hingston, P.: A Turing Test for Computer Game Bots. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games, 169–186 (September 2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Karpov, I., Schrum, J., Miikulainen, R.: Believable Bots via Human Trace Data. In: Hingston, P. (ed.) Believable Bots. Elsevier (2011)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kojima, A., Hirono, D., Sato, T., Murakami, S., Thawonmas, R.: Believable Bots via Multiobjective Neuroevolution. In: Hingston, P. (ed.) Believable Bots. Elsevier (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Nareyek, A.: AI in Computer Games. Queue 1(10), 58–65 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Oppy, G., Dowe, D.: The Turing Test. In: Zalta, E.N. (ed.) The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Spring 2011)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Pelphrey, K.A., Morris, J.P., McCarthy, G.: Grasping the Intentions of Others: The Perceived Intentionality of an Action Influences Activity in the Superior Temporal Sulcus during Social Perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(10), 1706–1716 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Perner, J., Lang, B.: Development of theory of mind and executive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3(9), 337–344 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Takeno, J., Inaba, K., Suzuki, T.: Experiments and examination of mirror image cognition using a small robot. In: Proceedings of the 2005 IEEE International Symposium on Computational Intelligence in Robotics and Automation, pp. 493–498 (2005)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tomasello, M., Carpenter, M.: Shared intentionality. Developmental Science 10(1), 121–125 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Turing, A.: Computing Machinery and Intelligence. Mind (49), 433–460 (1950)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press (1980)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Raúl Arrabales
    • 1
  • Agapito Ledezma
    • 1
  • Araceli Sanchis
    • 1
  1. 1.Carlos III University of MadridMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations