Interdisciplinarity: Creativity in Collaborative Research Approaches to Enhance Knowledge Transfer

  • Janet Coulter
Part of the Smart Innovation, Systems and Technologies book series (SIST, volume 18)

Abstract

This paper outlines how collaborative approaches were used to successfully generate research opportunities and enhance knowledge transfer in the development of new products. The researchers were drawn from across four disciplines within the University of Ulster and worked closely with an industrial partner to develop and test new approaches to the design and development of soft body armour. The paper highlights the drivers needed to support interdisciplinary collaboration and examines motivations for co-operation between industry and universities in the transfer, exchange and management of knowledge. A research project, highlighting two case studies demonstrates that design- and science-based partnerships can be successful in creating and transferring new knowledge.

Keywords

Interdisciplinarity Collaboration Knowledge Management Knowledge Exchange Innovation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Borg, G.A.: Psychophysical bases of perceived exertion. Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 14, 377–381 (1982)Google Scholar
  2. Baker, W.E., Sinkula, J.M.: Learning orientation, market orientation, and innovation: Integrating and extending models of organizational performance. Journal of Market Focused Management 4, 295–308 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Morris, B.: A comparative study of design professionals. In: Bruce, M., Jevnaker, B.H. (eds.) Management of Design Alliances: Sustaining Competitive Advantage. John Wiley, Chichester (1998)Google Scholar
  4. Cassiman, B., Veugelers, R.: R&D Cooperation between Firms and Universities: Some empirical evidence from Belgium (pdf). The International Journal of Industrial Organization 23(5-6), 355–379 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carayol, N., Thuc Uyen Nguyen, T.: Why do academic scientists engage in interdisciplinary research. Research Evaluation 14(1), 70–79 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cian, C., Koulmann, N., Barraud, P., Raphel, C., Jimenez, C., Melin, B.: Influence of variations in body hydration on cognitive function: effect of hyperhydration, heat stress, and exercise-induced dehydration. J. Psychophysiology 14, 29–36 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chesbrough, H.W.: The Era of Open Innovation. MIT Sloan Management Review 44, 35–41 (2003)Google Scholar
  8. Cohen, W., Levinthal, D., Damiel, A.: Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. ASQ 35, 128–152 (1990), fac-ulty.babson.edu/krollag/org_site/org.../cohen_abcap.htm (accessed January 10, 2012)
  9. Cooper, R., Press, M.: The Design Agenda; A guide to Successful Design Management. John Wiley & Sons, UK (2000)Google Scholar
  10. Coulter, J., Davison, G., McCLean, C., Carmody, O.: “What if?’ Research and Innovation by Design. In: Proceedings from the Senior Staff Conference, University of Ulster (2009)Google Scholar
  11. Coulter, J., Archer, E.: “What if?’ Research and Innovation by Design. In: Proceedings from the Senior Staff Conference. University of Ulster (2009)Google Scholar
  12. Daanen, H.A.M., Reffeltrath, P.A., Koerhuis, C.L.: Ergonomics of Protective Clothing. In: Jayaraman, S., et al. (eds.) The Netherlands in Intelligent Textiles for Personal Protection and Safety. IOS Press, Amsterdam (2000)Google Scholar
  13. Dalpe, R., DeBresson, C., Xiaoping, H.: The public sector as first user of innovations. Research Policy 21, 251–263 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egbu, C.O., Sturges, J., Bates, M.: Learning from Knowledge management and trans-organisational innovations in diverse project management environments. In: Hughes, W. (ed.) 15th Annual ARCOM Conference, Association of Researchers in Construction Management, September 15-17, vol. 1, pp. 95–103. Liverpool John Moores University (1999)Google Scholar
  15. Fraser, H.: Designing business. New models for success. In: Lockwood, T. (ed.) Design Thinking: Integrating Innovation Customer Experience and Brand Value. Allworth Press, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  16. Gopinathan, P.M., Pichan, G., Sharma, V.M.: Role of dehydration in heat stress-induced variations in mental performance. Arch. Environ. Health 43, 15–17 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hagedoorn, J., Duysters, G.: External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preferences for Strategic Alliances or Mergers and Acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies 39, 167–188 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Huxman, Vangen: Managing to collaborate. Theory and practice of collaborative advantage. Routhledge, London (2005)Google Scholar
  19. Jobber, D.: Choosing a survey method in management research. In: Smith, N.C., Dainty, P. (eds.) The Management Research Handbooks. Routledge, London (1991)Google Scholar
  20. Kabins, S.: Evaluating outcomes of different types of university-industry collaboration in computer science. In: Conference Proceedings Academy of Management (AOM) Conference (2011)Google Scholar
  21. Katz, J.S., Martin, B.R.: What is research collaboration? Research Policy 26, 1–18 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kelley, T., Littman, J.: The Ten Faces of Innovation; Strategies for heightening Creativity. Profile Books (2004)Google Scholar
  23. Knudsen, M.P.: The Relative Importance of Interfirm Relationships and Knowledge Transfer for New Product Development Success. Journal of Product Innovation Management 24, 117–138 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lieberman, H.R.: Hydration and Cognition: A Critical Review and Recommendations for Future Research. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 26(suppl. 5), 555S–561S (2007)Google Scholar
  25. McNiff, S.: Arts Based Research Arts Based research. Jessica Kingsley Ltd., London (1988)Google Scholar
  26. Melin, G.: Pragmatism and self-organization – research collaboration on the individual level. Research Policy 29(1), 31–40 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Mellis, W.: Partnering with Customers. In: Jolly, A. (ed.) Innovation; Harnessing Creativity for Business Growth. Kogan Page, London (2003)Google Scholar
  28. Mueller, P.: Exploring the knowledge filter: How entrepreneurship and university–industry relationships drive economic growth. Research Policy 35(10), 1499–1508 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Narin, F., Hamilton, K.S., Olivastro, D.: The Increasing Linkage between US Technology and Public Science. Research Policy 26, 317–330 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Nooteboom, B.: Learning by interaction: absorptive capacity, cognitive distance and governance. Journal of Management and Governance 4, 69–92 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Perkmann, M., Walsh, K.: University-industry relationships and open innovation: Towards a research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews 9, 259–280 (2007) (review article)Google Scholar
  32. Perkmann, M., Walsh, K.: How firms source knowledge from universities: partnerships versus contracting. In: Bessant, J., Venables, T. (eds.) Creating Wealth from Knowledge, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham (2007) (forthcoming)Google Scholar
  33. Press, M., Cooper, R.: The Design Experience, The Role of Design and Designers in the Twenty First Century. Ashgate Publishing Limited, Hampshire (2005)Google Scholar
  34. Rafols, I., Meyer, M.: How cross-disciplinary is bionanotechnology? Explorations in the specialty of molecular motors. Scientometrics 70(3), 633–650 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rhoten, D., Pfirman, S.: Women in interdisciplinary science: exploring preferences and consequences. Research Policy 36(1), 56–75 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rixon, D.: Strategic Commitment- The Foundation Stone for Innovation. In: Jolly, A. (ed.) Innovation; Harnessing Creativity for Business Growth. Kogan Page, London (2003)Google Scholar
  37. Schmickl, C., Kieser, A.: How much do specialists have to learn from each other when they jointly develop radical product innovations? Research Policy 37(3), 473–491 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Spencer, J.W.: How Relevant is University-Based Scientific Research to Private High-Technology Firms? A United States–Japan Comparison. Academy of Management Journal 44, 432–440 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Tidd, J., Trewhella, M.J.: Organizational and Technological Antecedents for Knowledge Acquisition and Learning. R&D Management 27, 359–375 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. van Rijnsoever, F.J., Hessels, L.K.: Factors associated with disciplinary and interdisciplinary research collaboration. Research Policy 40, 463–472 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Whitley, R.: The Intellectual and Social Organization of the Sciences, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2000)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Janet Coulter
    • 1
  1. 1.Research Institute for Art and Design (RIAD)University of UlsterBelfastUK

Personalised recommendations