A Platform for Location Based App Development for Citizen Science and Community Mapping

  • Claire Ellul
  • Suneeta Gupta
  • Mordechai Muki Haklay
  • Kevin Bryson
Chapter
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Community Mapping and Citizen Science involve members of the public in projects to address real-world problems such as noise pollution, air pollution or large-scale development in their neighbourhood. Many of these are inherently location-based and maps provide a powerful tool for engagement. Most importantly, they can be tailor-made to display information required by the drivers of these projects—different groups of people with different interests. Previous Community Mapping and Citizen Science projects allowed the public to capture data for use on such maps via web based systems. However, mobile devices offer additional means of data capture and their in-built sensing devices (microphone, accelerometer, GPS) allow participants to work with additional types of information not available on web-based systems. Although many such Applications (Apps) exist, our experience with community groups shows that flexibility is key—the groups themselves must be able to decide what information they are interested in. While it is possible to meet this need by developing a bespoke App for each group, many of the group members involved in such projects are not programmers and do not have funding for bespoke development. This paper describes the development of a location based services App platform for Community Mapping and Citizen Science. The platform allows an unlimited number of bespoke Apps to be created by a non-technical administrator, without the need for programming skills.

Keywords

Citizen science LBS apps Community mapping Non-technical users 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Dr Jerome Lewis from the Extreme Citizen Science Group at University College London, Louise Francis from Mapping for Change and David Jeevendram pillai from the Department of Anthropology at University College London, for their input into the requirements definition processes for the platform.

References

  1. Aanensen DM, Huntley DM, Feil EJ, Al-Own F, Spratt BG (2009) EpiCollect: linking smart phones to web applications for epidemiology, ecology and community data collection. PLoS ONE 4(9):e6968. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006968 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arnstein SR (1969) A ladder of citizen participation. J Am Inst Planners 35(4):216–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. APP Inventor (2012) What is MIT App Inventor,[online] Available from: http://www.appinventor.mit.edu/. Accessed 23April 2012]
  4. BBC (2006) Citizen science, radio 4 series, [online] Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/radio4/science/citizenscience.shtml. Accessed 1 June 2011
  5. BBC (2011) Big society is my mission [online] Available from: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-12443396. Accessed 28 April 2012
  6. Coburn J (2005) Street science: community knowledge and environmental Health. MIT Press, Cambridge, p 284Google Scholar
  7. Cohn JP (2008) Citizen science: can volunteers do real research? Bioscience 58(3):192–197Google Scholar
  8. Ellul C, Haklay M, Francis L, Rahemtulla H (2009a) A mechanism to create community maps for non-technical users. The international conference on advanced geographic information systems & web services—GEOWS 2009, Cancun, Mexico, 1–7 FebGoogle Scholar
  9. Ellul C, Rahemtullah H, Haklay M (2009b) Beyond the internet—increasing participation in community events by text messaging. In: Krek A, Rumor M, Zlatanova S, Fendel EM (eds) Urban and regional data management: UDMS 2009 Annual, CRC Press, London, pp 409–420Google Scholar
  10. Ellul C, Francis L, Haklay M (2011) Engaging with local communities: a review of three years of community mapping. In: Sisi Zlatanova, Hugo Ledoux, Elfriede M. Fendel, Massimo Rumor (eds) Urban and regional data management: UDMS Annual 2011, CRC PressGoogle Scholar
  11. Elwood S (2007) Grassroots groups as stakeholders in spatial data infrastructures: challenges and opportunities for local data development and sharing. Int J Geogr Inf Sci 22(1):71–90Google Scholar
  12. EveryAware (2012) EveryAware WideNoise http://cs.everyaware.eu/event/widenoise. Accessed 23 April 2012
  13. Eye On earth (2012) Sharing is everything, [online]. Available from: http://www.eyeonearth.org/. Accessed 23 April 2012
  14. Government White Paper (2008) Communities in control, real people, real power [online]. Available from: http://www.communities.gov.uk/publications/communities/communitiesincontrol. Accessed 30 July 2008
  15. Haklay M (2012) Citizen science and volunteered geographic information—overview and typology of participation. In: Sui DZ, Elwood S, Goodchild MF (eds) Crowdsourcing Geographic knowledge: volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice. Springer, Berlin (in press)Google Scholar
  16. Haklay M, Francis L, Whitaker C (2008) Mapping noise pollution, GIS professional, Issue 23Google Scholar
  17. Hargittai E (2002) Second level digital divide: differences in people’s online skills, First Monday, Vol 7, No 4 [online]. Available from: http://www.firstmonday.org/issues/issue7_4/hargittai/. Accessed: 1 Aug 2008
  18. Hartung C, Anokwa Y, Brunette W, Lerer A, Tseng C, Borriello G (2010) Open data kit: tools to build information services for developing regions ICTD2010 London, UK, 13–15 Dec 2010Google Scholar
  19. Leafwatch (2012) Final product post, [online]. Available from: http://naturelocator.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/2011/10/31/final-product-post/Accessed 23 April 2012
  20. Lewis J (2007) Enabling forest people to map their resources and monitor illegal logging in cameroon. Before farming: the archaeology and anthropology of hunter-gatherers. 2007/2 Article 3Google Scholar
  21. Mackerron G (2011) Mappiness.org.uk. In: LSE Research day 2011: the early career researcher, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK (Unpublished)Google Scholar
  22. Maisonneuve N, Stevens M, Ochab B (2010) Participatory noise pollution monitoring using mobile phones. Inf Policy 15(1–2):51–71Google Scholar
  23. Project Noah (2012) www.projectnoah.org/. Accessed 23 April 2012
  24. Scientific American (2012) Citizen science http://www.scientificamerican.com/citizen-science/. Accessed 26 April 2012
  25. Silvertown J (2009) A new dawn for citizen science. Trends Ecol Evol 24(9):467–471Google Scholar
  26. Talen E (2000) Bottom-up GIS: a new tool for individual and group expression in participatory planning. APA J 66(3):279–294 Google Scholar
  27. United Nations (1992) United nations environment programme. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 3–14 June 1992Google Scholar
  28. Wiggins A, Crowston, K (2011) From conservation to crowdsourcing: a typology of citizen science. In: 44th Hawaii international conference on system sciences (HICSS). doi: 10.1109/HICSS.2011.207
  29. World Meteorological Organisation (2001) Volunteers for weather, climate and water. WMO, Geneva, No 919Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claire Ellul
    • 1
  • Suneeta Gupta
    • 2
  • Mordechai Muki Haklay
    • 1
  • Kevin Bryson
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Civil, Environmental and Geomatic EngineeringUniversity College LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Department of Computer ScienceUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations