Zooming In–Zooming Out Hierarchies in Place Descriptions
Hierarchical place descriptions are a common means for people to communicate about place. Within them hierarchically ordered elements are linked by explicit or implicit relationships. This study analyses place descriptions collected in a mobile game, investigating hierarchies based on a classification of spatial granularity. The main findings show a dominance of hierarchical structures in place descriptions, but also a considerable number of deviations. Deviations are explained by principles other than spatial granularity, such as the presence of salient features and other construction principles. We conclude the need for and significance of more flexible models of hierarchies in the interaction with users of location-based services.
KeywordsPlace descriptions Hierarchies Granularity Salience
The authors acknowledge support by the Australian Research Council (LP100200199), and wish to thank anonymous reviewers for comments that helped to improve the chapter.
- Dale R, Geldof S, Prost J-P (2005) Using natural language generation in automatic route description. J Res Practice Inf Technol 37(1):89–105Google Scholar
- Grice HP (1975) Logic and conversation. In: Cole P, Morgan JL (eds) Speech acts, vol 2. Academic, New York, pp 41–58Google Scholar
- Kelleher J, Kruijff G-JM (2006) Incremental generation of spatial referring expressions in situated dialog. In: 21st international conference on computational linguistics, Association for computational linguistics. Sydney, AustraliaGoogle Scholar
- Schegloff EA (1972) Notes on a conversational practice: formulating place. In: Sudnow D (ed) Studies in social interaction, Vol 75. MacMillan, New York, pp 75–119Google Scholar
- Shanon B (1979) Where questions. In: 17th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics, University of California at San Diego, La Jolla, CA, ACLGoogle Scholar
- Siegel AW, White SH (1975) The development of spatial representations of large-scale environments. In: Reese HW (ed) Advances in child development and behaviour, vol 10. Academic, New York, pp 9–55Google Scholar
- Sorrows ME, Hirtle SC (1999) The Nature of landmarks for real and electronic spaces. In: Freksa C, Mark DM (eds) Spatial information theory, vol 1661. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 37–50Google Scholar
- Tenbrink T, Winter S (2009) Variable granularity in route directions. Spat Cogn Comput 9(1):64–93Google Scholar
- Timpf S, Volta GS, Pollock DW, Frank AU, Egenhofer MJ (1992) A conceptual model of wayfinding using multiple levels of abstraction. In: Frank AU, Campari I, Formentini U (eds) Theories and methods of spatio-temporal reasoning in geographic space, vol 639. Springer, Berlin, pp 348–367CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tomko M, Winter S (2009) Pragmatic construction of destination descriptions for urban environments. Spat Cogn Comput 9(1):1–29Google Scholar
- Winter S, Richter KF, Baldwin T, Cavedon L, Stirling L, Duckham M, Kealy A, Rajabifard A (2011) Location-based mobile games for spatial knowledge acquisition. In: cognitive engineering for mobile GIS. Belfast ME. Workshop at COSIT 2011Google Scholar