Orientation and Anisotropy of Multi-component Shapes

  • Joviša ŽunićEmail author
  • Paul L. Rosin
Part of the Mathematics and Visualization book series (MATHVISUAL)


There are many situations in which several single objects are better considered as components of a multi-component shape (e.g. a shoal of fish), but there are also situations in which a single object is better segmented into natural components and considered as a multi-component shape (e.g. decomposition of cellular materials onto the corresponding cells). Interestingly, not much research has been done on multi-component shapes. Very recently, the orientation and anisotropy problems were considered and some solutions have been offered. Both problems have straightforward applications in different areas of research which are based on a use of image based technologies, from medicine to astrophysics.The object orientation problem is a recurrent problem in image processing and computer vision. It is usually an initial step or a part of data pre-processing, implying that an unsuitable solution could lead to a large cumulative error at the end of the vision system’s pipeline. An enormous amount of work has been done to develop different methods for a spectrum of applications. We review the new idea for the orientation of multi-component shapes, and also its relation to some of the methods for determining the orientation of single-component shapes. We also show how the anisotropy measure of multi-component shapes, as a quantity which indicates how consistently the shape components are oriented, can be obtained as a by-product of the approach used.


Single Object Zernike Moment Anisotropy Measure Shape Component Shape Orientation 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. 1.
    Chandra, D.V.S.: Target orientation estimation using Fourier energy spectrum. IEEE Trans. Aerosp. Electron. Syst. 34, 1009–1012 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Chen, C.-C.: Improved moment invariants for shape discrimination. Pattern Recognit. 26, 683–6833 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cortadellas, J., Amat, J., de la Torre, F.: Robust normalization of silhouettes for recognition application. Pattern Recognit. Lett. 25, 591–601 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Ganesh, V.V., Chawla, N.: Effect of particle orientation anisotropy on the tensile behavior of metal matrix composites: experiments and microstructure-based simulation. Mat. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. 391, 342–353 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ha, V.H.S., Moura, J.M.F.: Afine-permutation invariance of 2-D shape. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 14, 1687–1700 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Iles, P.J., Brodland, G.W., Clausi, D.A., Puddister, S.M.: Estimation of cellular fabric in embryonic epithelia. Comput. Method Biomech. 10, 75–84 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Kim, W.-Y., Kim, Y.-S.: Robust rotation angle estimator. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 21, 768–773 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Klette, R., Žunić, J.: Digital approximation of moments of convex regions. Graph. Model Image Process. 61, 274–298 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Klette, R., Žunić, J.: Multigrid convergence of calculated features in image analysis. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 13, 173–191 (2000)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin, J.-C.: The family of universal axes. Pattern Recognit. 29, 477–485 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Martinez-Ortiz, C., Žunić, J.: Points position weighted shape orientation. Electron. Lett. 44, 623–624 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Martinez-Ortiz, C., Žunić, J.: Curvature weighted gradient based shape orientation. Pattern Recognit. 43, 3035–3041 (2010)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Munich M.E., Perona. P.: Visual identification by signature tracking. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 25, 200–217 (2003)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Palmer, S.E.: What makes triangles point: local and global effects in configurations of ambiguous triangles. Cognit. Psychol. 12, 285–305 (1980)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosin, P.L., Žunić, J.: Orientation and anisotropy of multi component shapes from boundary information. Pattern Recognit. 44, 2147–2160 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Rosin, P.L., Žunić, J.: Measuring squareness and orientation of shapes. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 39, 13–27 (2011)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Russell, J., Hasler, N., Klette, R., Rosenhahn, B.: Automatic track recognition of footprints for identifying cryptic species. Ecology 90, 2007–2013 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Saha, P.K., Wehrli, F.W.: A robust method for measuring trabecular bone orientation anisotropy at in vivo resolution using tensor scale. Pattern Recognit. 37, 1935–1944 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Scharcanski, J., Dodson, C.T.J.: Stochastic texture image estimators for local spatial anisotropy and its variability. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 49, 971–979 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shen, D., Ip, H.H.S.: Generalized affine invariant normalization. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. 19, 431–440 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Sonka, M., Hlavac, V., Boyle, R.: Image Processing, Analysis, and Machine Vision. Thomson-Engineering, Toronto (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Stojmenović, M., Žunić, J.: Measuring elongation from shape boundary. J. Math. Imaging Vis. 30, 73–85 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Tsai, W.H., Chou, S.L.: Detection of generalized principal axes in rotationally symmetric shapes. Pattern Recognit. 24, 95–104 (1991)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tzimiropoulos, G., Mitianoudis, N., Stathaki, T.: A unifying approach to moment based shape orientation and symmetry classification. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 18, 125–139 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wang, L., Tan, T.N., Hu, W.M., Ning, H.Z.: Automatic gait recognition based on statistical shape analysis. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 12, 1120–1131 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Žunić, J, Rosin, P.L.: An alternative approach to computing shape orientation with an application to compound shapes. Int. J. Comput. Vis. 81, 138–154 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Žunić, J., Stojmenović, M.: Boundary based shape orientation. Pattern Recognit. 41, 1785–1798 (2008)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Žunić, J., Kopanja, L., Fieldsend, J.E.: Notes on shape orientation where the standard method does not work. Pattern Recognit. 39, 856–865 (2006)zbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Žunić, J., Rosin, P.L., Kopanja, L.: On the orientability of shapes. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15, 3478–3487 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Computer ScienceUniversity of ExeterExeterUK
  2. 2.Mathematical Institute Serbian Academy of Sciences and ArtsBelgradeSerbia
  3. 3.School of Computer Science and InformaticsCardiff UniversityCardiffUK

Personalised recommendations