Robot Social Intelligence

  • Mary-Anne Williams
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7621)

Abstract

Robots are pervading human society today at an ever-accelerating rate, but in order to actualize their profound potential impact, robots will need cognitive capabilities that support the necessary social intelligence required to fluently engage with people and other robots. People are social agents and robots must develop sufficient social intelligence to engage with them effectively. Despite their enormous potential, robots will not be accepted in society unless they exhibit social intelligence skills. They cannot work with people effectively if they ignore the limitations, needs, expectations and vulnerability of people working in and around their workspaces. People are limited social agents, i.e. they do not have unlimited cognitive, computational and physical capabilities. People have limited ability in perceiving, paying attention, reacting to stimuli, anticipating, and problem-solving. In addition, people are constrained by their morphology; it limits their physical strength for example. People cannot be expected to and will not compensate for social deficiencies of robots, hence widespread acceptance and integration of robots into society will only be achieved if robots possess the sufficient social intelligence to communicate, interact and collaborate with people. In this paper we identify the key cognitive capabilities robots will require to achieve appropriate levels of social intelligence for safe and effective engagement with people. This work serves as a proto-blueprint that can inform the emerging roadmap and research agenda for the new exciting and challenging field of social robotics.

Keywords

Social Intelligence Cognitive Capabilities Artificial Intelligence Autonomous Agents Law and Ethics 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Albrecht, K.: Social Intelligence: the New Science of Success. Wiley (2005)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asimov, I.: I, Robot. Doubleday & Company, New York (1950)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Anderson, J.R.: Language, memory, and thought. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1976)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Asch, S.E.: Forming impressions of personality. Abnormal & Social Psy. 41, 258–290 (1946)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Baker, J.: Social Skills Training: for children and adolescents with Asperger Syndrome and Social-Communication Problems. Autism Asperger Publishing Company (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Bandura, A.: Aggression: A social learning analysis. Prentice-Hall (1973)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Bandura, A.: Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs (1986)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bandura, A., Walters, R.H.: Social learning and personality development. Rinehart, & Winston, New York (1963)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Bargh, J.A.: The four horsemen of automaticity: Awareness, intention, efficiency, and control in social cognition. In: Wyer, R.S., Srull, T.K. (eds.) Handbook of Social Cognition, 2nd edn., vol. 1, pp. 1–40. Erlbaum, Hillsdale (1994)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Baron-Cohen, S.: Mindblindness: An essay on autism and theory of mind. MIT Press (1995)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Baron-Cohen, S.: Precursors to a theory of mind: Understanding attention in others. In: Whiten, A. (ed.) Natural Theories of Mind: Evolution, Development and Simulation of Everyday Mindreading, pp. 233–251. Basil Blackwell, Oxford (1991)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baron-Cohen, S., Tager-Flusberg, H., Cohen, D.J.: Does the autistic child have a theory of mind? Cognition 21, 37–46 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Brass, M., et al.: Investigating Action Understanding: Inferential Processes versus Action Simulation. Current Biology 17(24), 2117–2121 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Broom, M.E.: A note on the validity of a test of social intelligence. Journal of Applied Psychology 12, 426–428 (1928)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Byrne, R., Whiten, A. (eds.): Machiavellian intelligence: Social expertise and the evolution of intellect in monkeys, apes, and humans. Clarendon Press, Oxford (1988)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Call, J., Tomasello, M.: Distinguishing intentional from accidental actions in orangutans (Pongo pygmaeus), chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), and human children (Homo sapiens). Journal of Comparative Psychology 112(2), 192–206 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cantor, N., Fleeson, W.: Social intelligence and intelligent goal pursuit: A cognitive slice of motivation. In: Spaulding, W.D. (ed.) Integrative Views of Motivation, Cognition, and Emotion, pp. 125–180 (1994)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Cantor, N., Kihlstrom, J.F.: Social intelligence and cognitive assessments of personality. In: Wyer, Srull (eds.) Advances in Social Cognition, vol. 2, pp. 1–59 (1989)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Cantor, N., Zirkel, S.: Personality, cognition, and purposive behavior. In: Pervin, L. (ed.) Handbook of Personality: Theory and Research, pp. 125–164. Guilford, NY (1990)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Carruthers, P.: Simulation and self-knowledge: a defence of the theory-theory. In: Carruthers, P., Smith, P.K. (eds.) Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge University Press (1996)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Huang, C.-M., Mutlu, B.: Robot Behavior Toolkit: Generating Effective Social Behaviors for Robots. In: International Human-Robot Interaction Conference (2012)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Conway, M.A.: Autobiographical memory: An introduction. OUP, Milton Keynes (1990)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Courtin, C.: The impact of sign language on the cognitive development of deaf children: The case of theories of mind. Cognition 77, 25–31 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Flavell, J.H., Ross, L.: Social and cognitive development: Frontiers and possible future. CUP (1981)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gallese, V., Goldman, A.: Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Science 2(12), 493–501 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gallup, G.G.: Chimpanzees: Self-recognition. Science 167, 86–87 (1970)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Gallup, G.G.: Self-awareness and the evolution of social intelligence. Behavioural Processes 42, 239–247 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Gärdenfors, P.: How Homo became Sapiens. MIT Press, Cambridge (2004)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Gärdenfors, P., Williams, M.-A.: Communication, Planning and Collaboration based on Representations and Simulations. In: Khlenthos, D., Schalley, A. (eds.) Language and Cognitive Structure, Benjamins, p. 56 (2007)Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gordon, R.M.: ’Radical’ simulationism. In: Carruthers, P., Smith, P.K. (eds.) Theories of Theories of Mind. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1996)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hare, B., Call, J., Tomasello, M.: Do chimpanzees know what conspecifics know and do not know? Animal Behavior 61, 139–151 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Horowitz, A.: Attention to attention in domestic dog (Canis familiaris) dyadic play. Animal Cognition 12, 107–118 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Kahn, Kanda, Ishiguro, Gill, Ruckert, Shen: Do People Hold a Humanoid Robot Morally Accountable for the Harm It Causes? In: Human-Robot Interaction Conference (2012)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kaminski, J., Neumann, M., Bräuer, J., Call, J., Tomasello, M.: Dogs (Canisfamiliaris) communicate with humans to request but not to inform. Animal Behavior 82(4), 651–658 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Kihlstrom, J., Cantor, N.: Social Intelligence. In: Sternberg, R.J. (ed.) Handbook of Intelligence, 2nd edn., pp. 359–379. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Meltzoff, A.N.: Imitation as a mechanism of social cognition: Origins of empathy, theory of mind, and the representation of action. In: Goswami, U. (ed.) Handbook of Childhood Cognitive Development, pp. 6–25. Blackwell Publishers, Oxford (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Pelphrey, K.A., et al.: Grasping the Intentions of Others: The Perceived Intentionality of an Action Influences Activity in the Superior Temporal Sulcus during Social Perception. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 16(10), 1706–1716 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Pettersson, H., Kaminski, J., Herrmann, E., Tomasello, M.: Understanding of human communicative motives in domestic dogs. Applied Animal Behaviour Sciences 133(3-4), 235–245 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Povinelli, D.J., Nelson, K.E., Boysen, S.T.: Inferences about guessing and knowing by chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes). Journal of Comparative Psychology 104(3), 203–210 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Premack, D., Woodruff, G.: Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral & Brain Sciences 1, 515–526 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Huang, C.-M., Thomaz, A.L.: Joint Attention in Human-Robot Interaction. In: AAAI Fall Symposium on Dialog with Robots, Arlington, VA (2010)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Scasselatti, B.: Theory of Mind for a Humanoid Robot (2004); Sechrest, L., Jackson, D.N.: Social intelligence and the accuracy of interpersonal predictions. Journal of Personality 29, 167–182 (1961)Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    Scheider, L., Grassman, S., Kaminski, J., Tomasello, M.: Domestic dogs use contextual information and tone of voice when following a human pointing gesture. PLOS One 6(7) (2011)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Sommerville, J.A., Decety, J.: Weaving the fabric of social interaction: Articulating developmental psychology and cognitive neuroscience in the domain of motor cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 13(2), 179–200 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Williams, M.-A.: Representation = Grounded Information. In: Ho, T.-B., Zhou, Z.-H. (eds.) PRICAI 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5351, pp. 473–484. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Williams, M.-A.: Autonomy: Life and Being. In: Bi, Y., Williams, M.-A. (eds.) KSEM 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6291, pp. 137–147. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Ryan Calo, M.: Robots and Privacy. In: Lin, P., Bekey, G., Abney, K. (eds.) Robot Ethics: The Ethical and Social Implications of Robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge (2011)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    Knapp, M., Romeo, R., Beecham, J.: Economic Cost of Autism in the UK, vol. 13, pp. 317–336 (autism May 1, 2009)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Novianto, R., Williams, M.-A.: The Role of Attention in Robot Self-Awareness. In: Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Interactive Communication, RO-MAN 2009, pp. 1047–1053 (2009)Google Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pfeifer, R., Bongard, J.C.: How the Body Shapes the Way We Think: A New View of Intelligence. MIT Press (2006)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Johnston, B., Williams, M.-A.: Autonomous Learning of Commonsense Simulations. In: International Symposium on Logical Formalizations of Commonsense Reasoning, pp. 73–78 (2009)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Novianto, R., Johnston, B., Williams, M.-A.: Attention in the ASMO Cognitive Architecture. In: Proc. Bioinspired Cognitive Architectures Symposium, pp. 98–105. IOS Press (2010)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    World Health Organisation  ICD-10: Clinical descriptions and diagnostic guidelines: Disorders of adult personality and behaviour (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mary-Anne Williams
    • 1
  1. 1.Social Robotics StudioUniversity of TechnologySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations