Advertisement

Should Empathic Social Robots Have Interiority?

  • Luisa Damiano
  • Paul Dumouchel
  • Hagen Lehmann
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7621)

Abstract

In this article we discuss whether robots need "interiority" in order to competently participate in emotional and empathic dynamics with human partners. We draw on original research on emotions, mind, neurophysiological mechanisms of social interaction and HRI to contest the common sense thesis according to which robots without "interiority" can only simulate emotions and empathy, to the extent that the affective (emotional and empathic) relationships between them and humans would not be authentic. The main thesis of our article is that empathic social robots do not need “interiority”, but the ability of dynamical coordination with their social partners and the surrounding environment(s), since this ability (and not “interiority”) is at the basis of human cognitive and affective (emotional and empathic) activity.

Keywords

artificial social agents artificial empathy autonomy emotions embodied mind extended mind radical embodiment 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Campe, R., Weber, J. (eds.): Rethinking Emotions: Interiority and Exteriority in Premodern, Modern and Contemporary Thought. Walter de Gruyter, New York (forthcoming, 2013)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Turkle, S.: Alone Together. Basic Books, New York (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Feil-Seifer, D.J., Matarić, M.J.: Ethical Principles for Socially Assistive Robotics. IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, Special Issue on Roboethics 18(1), 24–31 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Arbib, R.: Beware of the Passionate Robot. In: Fellous, J.-M., Arbib, M. (eds.) Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot, pp. 333–383. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Ziemke, T.: On the role of emotion in biological and robotic autonomy. Biosystems 91, 401–408 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Barandiaran, X., Moreno, A.: On What Makes Certain Dynamical Systems Cognitive. A minimally cognitive organization program. Journal of Adaptive Behavior 14(2), 171–185 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ziemke, T., Lowe, R.: On the Role of Emotion in Embodied Cognitive Architectures: From Organisms to Robots. Cogn. Comput. 1, 104–117 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Adolphs, R.: Can a Robot Have Emotions? In: Fellous, J.-M., Arbib, M. (eds.) Who Needs Emotions? The Brain Meets the Robot, pp. 9–25. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2005)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Dumouchel, P.: Émotions. Institut Synthélabo, Paris (1995)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dumouchel, P.: Social Emotions. In: Cańamero, L., Aylett, R. (eds.) Animating Expressive Characters for Social Interaction, pp. 1–20. John Benjamins, Amsterdam-Philadelphia (2008)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    James, W.: What is an Emotion? Mind 9, 188–205 (1884)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gallese, V.: Intentional Attunement. The Mirror Neuron System and its role in interpersonal relations. Interdisciplines (2005), http://www.interdisciplines.org/mirror/papers/1
  13. 13.
    Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., Gallese, V.: Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews Neuroscience 2, 661–670 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rizzolatti, G., Craighero, L.: The Mirror-Neuron System. Annual Rev. Neurosci. 27, 169–192 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Carr, L., Iacoboni, M., Dubeau, M.C., Mazziotta, J.C., Lenzi, G.L.: Neural mechanisms of empathy in humans: a relay from neural systems for imitation to limbic areas. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 100, 5497–5502 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Singer, T.: The neuronal basis and ontogeny of empathy and mind reading: review of literature and implications for future research. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews 6, 855–863 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Saarela, M.V., Hlushchuk, Y., Williams, A.C., Schurmann, M., Kalso, E., Hari, R.: The Compassionate Brain: Humans Detect Intensity of Pain from Another’s Face. Cerebral Cortex (2006)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gallese, V., Keysers, C., Rizzolatti, G.: A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science 8(9), 396–403 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Decety, J., Chaminade, T., Grézes, J., Meltoff, A.N.: A PET exploration of the neural mechanisms involved in reciprocal imitation. Neuroimage 15, 265–272 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Clark, A.: Supersizing the mind: embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2010)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Damiano, L.: Unità in dialogo. Mondadori, Milano (2009)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Varela, F.: Steps to a science of Interbeing: unfolding the Dharma implicit in modern cognitive science. In: Bachelor, S., Claxton, G., Watson, G. (eds.) The Psychology of Awakening, pp. 71–89. Rider/Random House, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Clark, A., Chalmers, D.J.: The extended mind. Analysis 58, 10–23 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Thompson, E., Varela, F.: Radical embodiment. Trends in Cognitive Science 5(10), 418–425Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Damiano, L.: Creative coordinations. World Futures: Journal of General Evolution 65(8), 1556–1884, 568–575 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Broz, F., Lehmann, H.: Automated Analysis of Mutual Gaze in Human Conversational Pairs. In: Nakano, Y., Conati, C., Bader, T. (eds.) Eye Gaze in Intelligent Human Computer Interaction. Springer (2012)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Fitzpatrick, P., Metta, G., Natale, L., Rao, S., Sadini, G.: Learning About Objects Through Action. Initial Steps Towards Artificial Cognition. In: Proceedings of Robotics and Automation, ICRA 2003 (2003)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Luisa Damiano
    • 1
  • Paul Dumouchel
    • 2
  • Hagen Lehmann
    • 3
  1. 1.Epistemology of the Sciences of the Artificial Research Group, Department of Human and Social SciencesUniversity of BergamoBergamoItaly
  2. 2.Graduate School of Core Ethics and Frontier SciencesRitsumeikan UniversityKita-kuJapan
  3. 3.Adaptive Systems Research Group, School of Computer Science and STCAUniversity of HertfordshireHatfieldUnited Kingdom

Personalised recommendations