Advertisement

Human-Robot Handshaking: A Hybrid Deliberate/Reactive Model

  • Yingzi Zeng
  • Yanan Li
  • Pengxuan Xu
  • Shuzhi Sam Ge
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7621)

Abstract

In this paper, we propose a hybrid deliberate/reactive model to achieve natural handshaking between human beings and robots. Our goal is to provide a perspective to achieve natural human-robot handshaking in addition to time/frequency based trajectory control. The proposed model consists of two parts. The reactive part is designed to enable the robot to follow the handshaking motion led by the human being, while the deliberate part is dedicated to embed a unique handshaking character into the robot. The validity of the proposed model is examined by comparing the trajectory and interaction force during the human-human and human-robot handshaking, respectively.

Keywords

Hybrid Model Social Robot Haptic Interface Reactive Motion Proposed Hybrid Model 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Asada, H., Slotine, J.J.E.: Robot analysis and control. John Wiley and Sons (1986)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arkin, R.C.: Behavior-based robotics. MIT Press (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hogan, N.: Impedance control: an approach to manipulation-Part I: Theory; Part II: Implementation; Part III: Applications. Journal of Dynamic Systems, Measurement and Control 107(1-24) (1985)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kazerooni, H., Sheridan, T.B., Houpt, P.K.: Robust compliant motion for manipulators-Part I: The fundamental concepts of compliant motion; Part II: Design method. IEEE Journal of Robotics and Automation 2(2), 83–105 (1986)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kelly, R., Carelli, R., Amestegui, M., Ortega, R.: On adaptive impedance control of robot manipulators. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Scottsdale, Arizona, pp. 572–577 (1989)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Colbaugh, R., Seraji, H., Glass, K.: Direct adaptive impedance control robot manipulator. Journal of Robotic Systems 10(2), 217–248 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Park, H., Lee, J.: Adaptive impedance control of a haptic interface. Mechatronics 14(3), 237–253 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tee, K.P., Yan, R., Li, H.: Adaptive admittance control of a robot manipulator under task space constraint. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Anchorage, USA, pp. 5181–5186 (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chua, Y., Tee, K.P., Yan, R.: Human-robot motion synchronization using reactive and predictive controllers. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Tianjin, China, pp. 223–228 (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hashimoto, M., Hashizume, H., Katoh, Y.: Design of dynamics for synchronization based control of human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics, Kunming, China, pp. 790–795 (December 2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Wang, Z., Peer, A., Buss, M.: An HMM approach to realistic haptic human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE Joint Eurohaptics Conference and Symposium on Haptic Interfaces for Virtual Enviroment and Teleoperator Systems, Salt Lake City, USA, pp. 374–379 (March 2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Anderson, D.M.: Mosby’s Medical, nursing and allied health dictionary, 4th edn. Mosby-Year Book (1994)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ge, S.S., Liew, C.F., Li, Y., Yang, J.: System design and hardware integration of social robot Nancy. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/SICE International Symposium on System Integration, Kyoto, Japan, pp. 336–341 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Ma, J., Li, Y., Ge, S.S.: Adaptive control for a cable driven robot arm. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Chengdu, China, pp. 1074–1079 (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kasuga, T., Hashimoto, M.: Human-robot handshaking using neural oscillators. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference of Robotics and Automation, Barcelona, Spain, pp. 3802–3807 (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Giannopoulos, E., Wang, Z., Peer, A., Buss, M., Slater, M.: Comparison of people’s responses to real and virtual handshakes within a virtual environment. Brain Research Bulletin 85(5), 276–282 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Karniel, A., Nisky, I., Avraham, G., Peles, B.-C., Levy-Tzedek, S.: A Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence. In: Kappers, A.M.L., van Erp, J.B.F., Bergmann Tiest, W.M., van der Helm, F.C.T. (eds.) EuroHaptics 2010, Part I. LNCS, vol. 6191, pp. 197–204. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yingzi Zeng
    • 1
  • Yanan Li
    • 1
    • 2
  • Pengxuan Xu
    • 1
  • Shuzhi Sam Ge
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Social Robotics Laboratory, Interactive Digital Media Institute, and Department of Electrical and Computer EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  2. 2.NUS Graduate School for Integrative Sciences and EngineeringNational University of SingaporeSingaporeSingapore
  3. 3.Robotics Institute, and School of Computer Science and EngineeringUniversity of Electronic Science and Technology of ChinaChengduChina

Personalised recommendations