Difference of Efficiency in Human-Robot Interaction According to Condition of Experimental Environment

  • Ho Seok Ahn
  • Dong-Wook Lee
  • Dongwoon Choi
  • Duk-Yeon Lee
  • Manhong Hur
  • Hogil Lee
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7621)

Abstract

Human-Robot Interaction is most important function for social robot systems. Android robot systems, which have human-like appearance, are used for interaction with humans because they have the merit of showing their emotions by similar way to humans. Lots of these robot systems are developed and verified their efficiency and performance by analyzing the experimental results from questionnaire method. However, the results from questionnaire method can be different from many conditions. In this paper, we analyze the difference of experimental results from questionnaire method by comparing three groups: the first group gains benefits by competition, the second group gains benefits without competition, and the last group does not gain anything. For these experiments, android head system EveR-4 H33, which has 33 motors inside of head to show its facial expressions, is used.

Keywords

Human-Robot interaction emotional expression facial expression android system EveR series head robot system 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Lee, H.S., Park, J.W., Chung, M.J.: A Linear Affect–Expression Space Model and Control Points for Mascot-Type Facial Robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics, 863–873 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Guizzo, E.: The Man Who Made a Copy of Himself. IEEE Spectrum, pp. 44–56 (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ishiguro, H.: Scientific issues concerning androids. International Journal of Robotics Research 26(1), 105–117 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Hashimoto, T., Hiramatsu, S., Tsuji, T., Kobayashi, H.: Realization and Evaluation of Realistic Nod with Receptionist robot SAYA. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Workshop on Robot and Human Communication (RO-MAN 2007), pp. 326–331 (2007)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Oh, J.-H., Hanson, D., Kim, W.-S., Han, I.Y., Kim, J.-Y., Park, I.-W.: Design of Android type Humanoid Robot Albert HUBO. In: Proceedings of the 2006 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS 2006), pp. 1428–1433 (2006)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Nakaoka, S., Kanehiro, F., Miura, K., Morisawa, M., Fujiwara, K., Kaneko, K., Kajita, S., Hirukawa, H.: Creating Facial Motions of Cybernetic Human HRP-4C. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Humanoid Robots, pp. 561–567 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ahn, H.S., Lee, D.-W., Choi, D., Lee, D.Y., Hur, M.H., Lee, H., Shon, W.H.: Development of an Android for Singing with Facial Expression. In: Proceedings of the Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society (IECON 2011), pp. 104–109 (2011)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Choi, D., Lee, D.-W., Lee, D.Y., Ahn, H.S., Lee, H.: Design of an android robot head for stage performances. Artificial Life and Robotics 16(3), 315–317 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Ahn, H.S., Lee, D.-W., Choi, D., Lee, D.-Y., Hur, M., Lee, H.: Appropriate Emotions for Facial Expressions of 33-DOFs Android Head EveR-4 H33. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Robot and Human Communication, RO-MAN 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ahn, H.S., Lee, D.-W., Choi, D., Lee, D.-Y., Hur, M., Lee, H.: Uses of Facial Expressions of Android Head System according to Gender and Age. In: Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, SMC 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Ekman, P.: Universals and cultural differences in facial expressions of emotion. In: Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, vol. 19, pp. 207–283 (1972)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Fehr, B., Russell, J.A.: Concept of emotion viewed from a protorype perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology 113, 464–486 (1984)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Izard, C.E.: Human Emotions. Plenum Press (1977)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tomkins, S.S.: Affect, imagery, consciousness (vol.1): The positive affects (1962)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Tomkins, S.S.: Affect, imagery, consciousness (vol. 2): The positive affects (1963)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Panksepp, J.: Toward a general psychobiological theory of emotions. Journal of Behavioral and Brain Science 5, 407–468 (1982)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sroufe, L.A.: Socioemotional development: Handbook of infant development (1979)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ho Seok Ahn
    • 1
    • 2
  • Dong-Wook Lee
    • 1
  • Dongwoon Choi
    • 1
  • Duk-Yeon Lee
    • 1
  • Manhong Hur
    • 1
  • Hogil Lee
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Applied Robot TechnologyKorea Institute of Industrial TechnologyAnsanRepublic of Korea
  2. 2.Intelligent Robotics and Communication LaboratoriesAdvanced Telecommunications Research Institute InternationalKyotoJapan

Personalised recommendations