Skip to main content

Imagery of Disabled People within Social Robotics Research

  • Conference paper

Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNAI,volume 7621)

Abstract

Social robotics is an emerging field, with many applications envisioned for people with disabilities. This paper explores these applications and the portrayal of people with disabilities within the social robotics discourse. Our review of social robotics literature revealed that social robotics mainly portrays disabled people through a medical/body ability deficiency lens, namely identifying deficient abilities, and then proposing how a certain robot can fix them and give the individual “normal” functioning. However, within the Disabled People Rights Movement, the academic field of disability studies, and existing legal documents, a second narrative is evident which focuses less on ‘fixing’ the person to the species-typical norm, and more on increasing the participation in society of that person the way they are. We submit that the second type of narrative and its way of defining problems and solutions needs more visibility within the social robotics discourse and in the vision of possible products.

Keywords

  • Social robotics
  • people with disabilities
  • normalization
  • diversity
  • ability expectations
  • imagery
  • narrative

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (Canada)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Kim, Y.-D., Hong, J.-W., Kang, W.-S., Baek, S.-S., Lee, H.-S., An, J.: Design of Robot Assisted Observation System for Therapy and Education of Children with Autism. In: ICSR 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6414, pp. 222–231. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  2. Yun, S., Shin, J., Kim, D., Kim, C.G., Kim, M., Choi, M.-T.: Engkey: Tele-education Robot. In: Mutlu, B., Bartneck, C., Ham, J., Evers, V., Kanda, T. (eds.) ICSR 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7072, pp. 142–152. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  3. Heerink, M., Krose, B., Evers, V., Wielinga, B.: Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: The almere model. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2, 361–375 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  4. Boccanfuso, L., O’Kane, J.M.: CHARLIE: An adaptive robot design with hand and face tracking for use in autism therapy. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3, 337–347 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  5. Moon, A.J., Danielson, P., Van der Loos, H.F.M.: Survey-Based Discussions on Morally Contentious Applications of Interactive Robotics. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 4, 77–96 (2012)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  6. Sugiyama, O., Shinozawa, K., Akimoto, T., Hagita, N.: Case Study of a Multi-robot Healthcare System: Effects of Docking and Metaphor on Persuasion. In: Ge, S.S., Li, H., Cabibihan, J.-J., Tan, Y.K. (eds.) ICSR 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6414, pp. 90–99. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  7. Broadbent, E., Lee, Y.I., Stafford, R.Q., Kuo, I.H., MacDonald, B.A.: Mental schemas of robots as more human-like are associated with higher blood pressure and negative emotions in a human-robot Interaction. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3, 291–297 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  8. Kuo, I., Jayawardena, C., Broadbent, E., MacDonald, B.A.: Multidisciplinary Design Approach for Implementation of Interactive Services: Communication Initiation and user Identification for Healthcare Service Robots. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3, 443–456 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  9. Carpenter, J., Davis, J.M., Erwin-Steward, N., Lee, T.R., Bransford, J.D., Vye, N.: Gender Representation and Humanoid Robots Designed for Domestic Use. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1, 261–265 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  10. Tao, Y., Wang, T., Wei, H., Yuan, P.: A Behavior Adaptation Method for an Elderly Companion Robot-—Rui. In: Ge, S.S., Li, H., Cabibihan, J.-J., Tan, Y.K. (eds.) ICSR 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6414, pp. 141–150. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  11. van der Zant, T., Iocchi, L.: RoboCup@Home: Adaptive Benchmarking of Robot Bodies and Minds. In: Mutlu, B., Bartneck, C., Ham, J., Evers, V., Kanda, T. (eds.) ICSR 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7072, pp. 214–225. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirby, R., Forlizzi, J., Simmons, R.: Affective social robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 58, 322–332 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  13. de Ruyter, B., Saini, P., Markopoulos, P., van Breemen, A.: Assessing the effects of building social intelligence in a robotic interface for the home. Interact Comput. 17, 522–541 (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  14. Fong, T., Nourbakhsh, I., Dautenhahn, K.: A survey of socially interactive robots. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42, 143–166 (2003)

    CrossRef  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Turkle, S.: Authenticity in the age of digital companions. Interaction Studies 8(3), 501–517 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  16. Ziaja, S.: Homewrecker 2.0: An Exploration of Liability for Heart Balm Torts Involving AI Humanoid Consorts. In: Mutlu, B., Bartneck, C., Ham, J., Evers, V., Kanda, T. (eds.) ICSR 2011. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 7072, pp. 114–124. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  17. Stedman, N.: ADB. Leonardo 43(4), 414–415 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  18. Castellano, G., Leite, I., Pereira, A., Martinho, C., Paiva, A., McOwan, P.W.: Affect recognition for interactive companions: Challenges and design in real world scenarios. J. Multimodal. User Interfaces 3, 89–98 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  19. Boccanfuso, L., O’Kane, J.M.: Adaptive Robot Design with Hand and Face Tracking for Use in Autism Therapy. In: Ge, S.S., Li, H., Cabibihan, J.-J., Tan, Y.K. (eds.) ICSR 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6414, pp. 265–274. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  20. Tapus, A., Mataric, M.J., Scassellati, B.: Socially assistive robotics (Grand challenges of robotics). IEEE Robotics & Automation Magazine, 35–42 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  21. Broadbent, E., Stafford, R., MacDonald, B.: Acceptance of Healthcare Robots for the Older Population: Review and Future Directions. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 1, 319–330 (2009)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  22. Huijnen, C., Badii, A., van den Heuvel, H., Caleb-Solly, P., Thiemert, D.: “Maybe It Becomes a Buddy, But Do Not Call It a Robot” – Seamless Cooperation between Companion Robotics and Smart Homes. In: Keyson, D., Maher, M.L., Streitz, N., Cheok, A., Augusto, J.C., Wichert, R., Englebienne, G., Aghajan, H., Kröse, B.J.A. (eds.) AmI 2011. LNCS, vol. 7040, pp. 324–329. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  23. Salter, T., Werry, I., Michaud, F.: Going into the wild in child-robot interaction studies: Issues in social robotic development. Intel. Serv. Robotics 1, 93–108 (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  24. Fujimoto, I., Matsumoto, T., De Silva, P., Ravindra, S., Kobayashi, M., Higashi, M.: Mimicking and evaluating human motion to improve the imitation skill of children with autism through a robot. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3, 349–357 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  25. Welch, K.C., Lahiri, U., Warren, Z., Sarkar, N.: An approach to the design of socially acceptable robots for children with autism spectrum disorders. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2, 391–403 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  26. Ang, M., Limkaichong, L., Perez, W., Sayson, L., Tampo, N., Bugtai, N., Estanislao-Clark, E.: Development of Robotic Arm Rehabilitation Machine with Biofeedback That Addresses the Question on Filipino Elderly Patient Motivation. In: Ge, S.S., Li, H., Cabibihan, J.-J., Tan, Y.K. (eds.) ICSR 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6414, pp. 401–410. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  27. Robins, B., Dautenhahn, K.: Developing Play Scenarios for Tactile Interaction with a Humanoid Robot: A Case Study Exploration with Children with Autism. In: Ge, S.S., Li, H., Cabibihan, J.-J., Tan, Y.K. (eds.) ICSR 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6414, pp. 243–252. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  28. Scassellati, B., Crick, C., Gold, K., Kim, E., Shic, F., Sun, G.: Social development. IEEE Computational Intelligence Mazagine, 41–47 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Fujimoto, I., Matsumoto, T., De Silva, P.R.S., Kobayashi, M., Higashi, M.: Study on An Assistive Robot for Improving Imitation Skill of Children with Autism. In: Ge, S.S., Li, H., Cabibihan, J.-J., Tan, Y.K. (eds.) ICSR 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6414, pp. 232–242. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  30. WHO: International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health. World Health Organization, Geneva (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  31. American Psychiatric Association: DSM-IV: Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, 4th ed. American Psychiatric Association, Arlington (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kozima, H., Nakagawa, C., Yasuda, Y.: Children robot interaction: a pilot study in autism therapy. In: von Hofsten, C., Rosander, K. (eds.) Progress in Brain Research, vol. 164, pp. 385–400. Elsevier (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Bernd, T., Gelderblom, G.J., Vanstipelen, S., de Witte, L.: Short Term Effect Evaluation of IROMEC Involved Therapy for Children with Intellectual Disabilities. In: Ge, S.S., Li, H., Cabibihan, J.-J., Tan, Y.K. (eds.) ICSR 2010. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 6414, pp. 259–264. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  34. Michalowski, M.P.: Rhythmic Human-Robot Social Interaction. Dissertation (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  35. Sung, J., Grinter, R.E., Christensen, H.I.: Domestic Robot Ecology: An Initial Framework to Unpack Long-Term Acceptance of Robots at Home. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 2, 417–429 (2010)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  36. Syrdal, D.S., Nomura, T., Hirai, H., Dautenhahn, K.: Examining the Frankenstein Syndrome. In: Mutlu, B., Bartneck, C., Ham, J., Evers, V., Kanda, T. (eds.) ICSR 2011. LNCS, vol. 7072, pp. 125–134. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  37. Gonzalez-Pacheco, V., Ramey, A., Alonso-Martin, F., Castro-Gonzalez, A., Salichs, M.A.: Maggie: A Social Robot as a Gaming Platform. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3, 371–381 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  38. Sparrow, R., Sparrow, L.: In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Mind Mach. 16, 141–161 (2006)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  39. Coeckelbergh, M.: Humans, animals, and robots: A phenomenological approach to human-robot relations. Int. J. Soc. Robot. 3, 197–204 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  40. Burch, S.: Transcending revolutions: the Tsars, the Soviets, and deaf culture. J. Soc. Hist. 34(2), 393–401 (2000)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  41. Abberley, P.: Understanding deaf culture: in search of deafhood. Disability & Society 18(7), 971–973 (2003)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  42. Chimedza, R.: The cultural politics of integrating deaf students in regular schools in Zimbabwe. Disability & Society 13(4), 493–502 (1998)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  43. Hladek, G.A.: Cochlear implants, the deaf culture, and ethics: a study of disability, informed surrogate consent, and ethnocide. Monash. Bioeth. Rev. 21(1), 29–44 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  44. Kersting, S.: Balancing between deaf and hearing worlds: reflections of mainstreamed college students on relationships and social interaction. J. Deaf. Stud. Deaf. Educ. 2(4), 252–263 (1997)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  45. Lane, H., Bahan, B.: Ethics of cochlear implantation in young children: A review and reply from a Deaf-World perspective. Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery 119(4), 297–313 (1998)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  46. Sparrow, R.: Defending deaf culture: The case of cochlear implants. Journal of Political Philosophy 13(2), 135–152 (2005)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  47. Carlson, L.: Cognitive Ableism and Disability Studies: Feminist Reflections on the History of Mental Retardation. Hypatia 16(4), 124–146 (2001)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  48. Mitchell, D.T., Snyder, S.L.: The Body and Physical Difference: Discourses of Disability (The Body, In Theory: Histories of Cultural Materialism). University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (1997)

    Google Scholar 

  49. Olyan, S.M.: The ascription of physical disability as a stigmatizing strategy in biblical iconic polemics. The Journal of Hebrew Scriptures 9, 2–15 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  50. Rose, M.: The Staff of Oedipus: Transforming Disability in Ancient. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  51. Schipper, J.: Disability Studies and the Hebrew Bible: Figuring Mephibosheth in the David Story. Continuum, New York (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  52. Overboe, J.: Vitalism: Subjectivity Exceeding Racism, Sexism, and (Psychiatric) Ableism. Wagadu: A Journal of Transnational Women’s and Gender Studies 4(2), 23–34 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  53. Campbell, F.A.K.: Inciting Legal Fictions: ’Disability’s’ Date with Ontology and the Ableist Body of the Law. Griffith Law Review 10(1), 42 (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  54. Wolbring, G.: Ableism and Favoritism for Abilities Governance, Ethics, and Studies: New Tools for Nanoscale and Nanoscale enabled Science and Technology Governance. In: Cozzens, S., Wetmore, J.M. (eds.) The Yearbook of Nanotechnology in Society. The Challenge of Equity and Equality, vol. II, Springer, New York (2010)

    Google Scholar 

  55. Boundy, K.: Are You Sure, Sweetheart, That You Want to Be Well?: An Exploration Of The Neurodiversity Movement. Radical Psychology: A Journal of Psychology, Politics & Radicalism 7(2), 2–2 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  56. Broderick, A.A., Ne’eman, A.: Autism as metaphor: narrative and counter-narrative. International Journal of Inclusive Education 12(5-6), 459–476 (2008)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

  57. Ortega, F.: The Cerebral Subject and the Neurodiversity Movement. Mana-Estudos De Antropologia Social 14(2), 477–509 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  58. Sarrett, J.C.: Trapped Children: Popular Images of Children with Autism in the 1960s and 2000s. J. Med. Humanit. 32(2), 141–153 (2011)

    CrossRef  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Yumakulov, S., Yergens, D., Wolbring, G. (2012). Imagery of Disabled People within Social Robotics Research. In: Ge, S.S., Khatib, O., Cabibihan, JJ., Simmons, R., Williams, MA. (eds) Social Robotics. ICSR 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 7621. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_17

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34103-8_17

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34102-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34103-8

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)