Skip to main content

Conceptual Modeling for Systems Integration

  • Conference paper
Conceptual Modeling (ER 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNISA,volume 7532))

Included in the following conference series:

  • 2858 Accesses

Abstract

Conceptual modeling for systems integration is challenging because of two reasons. First, it must deal with a universe of discourse that includes human creations: software applications and interactions among them. Second, the knowledge needed to create appropriate conceptual models must be obtained from several users who can only possess partial views. The constructs and methods employed for conceptual modeling for systems integration should, therefore, facilitate representation as well as combination of partial knowledge captured from multiple organizational participants. We present an overview of an approach named systems integration requirements engineering (SIRE) to address this set of challenges. The approach includes a set of modeling constructs and an associated method that allows generating and then merging local conceptual models for systems integration. The paper presents formal descriptions of the constructs, a method for developing individual model fragments, an results from an initial empirical evaluation that compares our proposals against a benchmark provided by UML communication diagrams.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Bass, C., Lee, J.M.: Building a Business Case for EAI. EAI Journal, 18–20 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Casati, F., Discenza, A.: Modeling and Managing Interactions Among Business Processes. Journal of Systems Integration 10, 145–168 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chan, H.C., Wei, K.K., Siau, K.: User-Database Interface: The Effect of Abstraction levels on Query Performance. MIS Quarterly 17(4), 441–464 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Erl, T.: Service-Oriented Architecture: A Field Guide to Integrating XML and Web Services. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Evgeniou, T.: Information Integration and Information Strategies for Adaptive Enterprise. European Management Journal 20(5), 486–494 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Foster, I., Grossman, R.L.: Data Integration in a Bandwidth-rich World. Communications of the ACM 46(11), 50–57 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gregor, S.: The Nature of Theory in Information Systems. MIS Quarterly 30(3), 611–642 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hasselbring, W.: Information System Integration. Communications of the ACM 43(6), 33–38 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hevner, A.R., Mills, H.D.: Box-Structured Requirements Determination Methods. Decision Support Systems 13, 223–239 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hevner, A., March, S., Park, J., Ram, S.: Design science research in information systems. MIS Quarterly 28(1), 75–105 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Hobday, M., Davies, A., Prencipe, A.: Systems Integration: A Core Capability of the Modern Corporation. Industrial and Corporate Change 14(6), 1109–1143 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hohpe, G., Woolf, B.: Enterprise Integration Patterns: Designing, Building and Deploying Messaging Solutions. Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co. Inc., Boston (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Jonkers, H., Lankhorst, M., Buuren, R.V., Hoppenbrouwers, S., Bonsangue, M., Torre, L.V.D.: Concepts for Modeling Enterprise Architectures. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems 13(3), 257–287 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Krafzig, D., Banke, K., Slama, D.: Enterprise SOA: Service-Oriented Architecture Best Practices. Prentice Hall PTR, Upper Saddle River (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Lee, J., Siau, K., Hong, S.: Enterprise Integration with ERP and EAI. Communications of the ACM 46(2), 54–60 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li, H., Su, S.Y.W.: Business Object Modeling, Validation, and Mediation for Integrating Heterogeneous Application Systems. Journal of Systems Integration 10, 307–328 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Malone, T.W., Crowston, K.: The Interdisciplinary Study of Coordination. ACM Computing Surveys 26(1), 87–119 (1994)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. March, S.T., Allen, G.N.: On the Representation of Temporal Dynamics. In: Siau, K. (ed.) Advances in Database Management, pp. 37–53. Idea Group Publishing (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  19. March, S.T., Smith, G.F.: Design and natural science research on information technology. Decision Support Systems 15(4), 251–266 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Markus, M.L.: Paradigm Shifts – e-Business and Business/Systems Integration. Communications of the Association for Information Systems 4(10), 1–44 (2000)

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Sikora, R., Shaw, M.J.: A Multi-agent Framework for the Coordination and Integration of Information Systems. Management Science 44(11), S65-S78. (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Sutherland, J., Heuvel, W.J.V.D.: Enterprise Application Integration and Complex Adaptive Systems. Communications of the ACM 45(10), 59–64 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Teo, H.H., Chan, H.C., Wei, K.K.: Performance Effects of Formal Modeling Language Differences: A Combined Abstraction level and Construct Complexity Analysis. IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication 49(2), 160–175 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Topi, H., Ramesh, V.: Human Factors Research on Data Modeling: A Review of Prior Research, An Extended Framework and Future Research Directions. Journal of Database Management 13(2), 3–19 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Umapathy, K., Purao, S., Barton, R.R.: Designing Enterprise Integration Solutions – Effectively. European Journal of Information Systems 17(5), 518–528 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Umapathy, K., Purao, S.: Systems Integration and Web Services. IEEE Computer 43(11), 91–94 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. van der Aalst, W., et al.: Workflow Modeling Using Proclets. In: Scheuermann, P., Etzion, O., et al. (eds.) CoopIS 2000. LNCS, vol. 1901, pp. 198–209. Springer, Heidelberg (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  28. Vernadat, F.B.: Interoperable Enterprise Systems: Principles, Concepts, and Methods. Annual Reviews in Control (31), 137–145 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Bolloju, N., Purao, S., Tan, CH. (2012). Conceptual Modeling for Systems Integration. In: Atzeni, P., Cheung, D., Ram, S. (eds) Conceptual Modeling. ER 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7532. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34002-4_25

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-34002-4_25

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-34001-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-34002-4

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics