Advertisement

Building a Lexically and Semantically-Rich Resource for Paraphrase Processing

  • Wannachai Kampeera
  • Sylviane Cardey-Greenfield
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7614)

Abstract

In this paper, we present a methodology for building a lexically and semantically-rich resource for paraphrase processing on French. The paraphrase extraction model is rule-based and is guided by means of predicates. The extraction process comprises 4 main processing modules: 1. derived words extraction; 2. sentences extraction; 3. chunking & head word identification, and 4. predicate-argument structure mapping. We use the corpus provided by an agro-food industry enterprise to test the 4 modules of the paraphrase structures extractor. We explain how each processing module functions.

Keywords

paraphrase paraphrase structures paraphrase structures extraction lexical resource 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Kampeera, W., Cardey, S.: Paraphrases in Natural Language Processing. In: Proceedings of the 12th International Symposium on Social Communication - Comunicación Social en el Siglo XXI, vol. II, pp. 963–967. Santiago de Cuba, Cuba (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Androutsopoulos, I., Malakasiotis, P.: A Survey of Paraphrasing and Textual Entailment Methods. Journal of Natural Language Processing 11, 151–198 (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hathout, N., Namer, F., Dal, G.: An Experimental Constructional Database: The MorTAL Project. In: Boucher, P. (ed.) Many Morphologies. Cascadilla, Somerville (2002)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Sajous, F., Navarro, E., Gaume, B., Prévot, L., Chudy, Y.: Semi-automatic Endogenous Enrichment of Collaboratively Constructed Lexical Resources: Piggybacking onto Wiktionary. In: Loftsson, H., Rögnvaldsson, E., Helgadóttir, S. (eds.) IceTAL 2010. LNCS, vol. 6233, pp. 332–344. Springer, Heidelberg (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Romary, L., Salmon-Alt, S., Francopoulo, G.: Standards going concrete: from LMF to Morphalou. In: Workshop on Electronic Dictionaries, Coling 2004, Geneva, Switzerland (2004)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cardey, S., Greenfield, P.: Disambiguating and Tagging Using Systemic Grammar. In: Proceedings of the 8th International Symposium on Social Communication, pp. 559–564 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fellbaum, C.: WordNet: An Electronic Lexical Database. MIT Press, Cambridge (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fišer, D., Sagot, B.: Combining Multiple Resources to Build Reliable Wordnets. In: Sojka, P., Horák, A., Kopeček, I., Pala, K. (eds.) TSD 2008. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 5246, pp. 61–68. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cardey, S., Greenfield, P., Bioud, M., Dziadkiewicz, A., Kuroda, K., Marcelino, I., Melian, C., Morgadinho, H., Robardet, G., Vienney, S.: The Classificatim Sense-Mining System. In: Salakoski, T., Ginter, F., Pyysalo, S., Pahikkala, T. (eds.) FinTAL 2006. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 4139, pp. 674–683. Springer, Heidelberg (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lin, D., Pantel, P.: Discovery of Inference Rules for Question Answering. Natural Language Engineering 7(4), 343–360 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Harris, Z.: Distributional Structure. In: Katz, J.J. (ed.) The Philosophy of Linguistics, pp. 26–47. Oxford University Press, New York (1985)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Wannachai Kampeera
    • 1
  • Sylviane Cardey-Greenfield
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre Tesnière - Équipe d’Accueil EA 2283Université de Franche-Comté - UFR SLHSBesançon CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations