Advertisement

Using Torque Redundancy to Optimize Contact Forces in Legged Robots

  • Ludovic Righetti
  • Jonas Buchli
  • Michael Mistry
  • Mrinal Kalakrishnan
  • Stefan Schaal
Part of the Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering book series (LNEE, volume 57)

Abstract

The development of legged robots for complex environments requires controllers that guarantee both high tracking performance and compliance with the environment. More specifically the control of contact interaction with the environment is of crucial importance to ensure stable, robust and safe motions. In the following, we present an inverse dynamics controller that exploits torque redundancy to directly and explicitly minimize any combination of linear and quadratic costs in the contact constraints and in the commands. Such a result is particularly relevant for legged robots as it allows to use torque redundancy to directly optimize contact interactions. For example, given a desired locomotion behavior, it can guarantee the minimization of contact forces to reduce slipping on difficult terrains while ensuring high tracking performance of the desired motion. The proposed controller is very simple and computationally efficient, and most importantly it can greatly improve the performance of legged locomotion on difficult terrains as can be seen in the experimental results.

Keywords

Contact Force Tangential Force Ground Reaction Force Humanoid Robot Constraint Force 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Aghili, F.: A unified approach for inverse and direct dynamics of constrained multibody systems based on linear projection operator: Applications to control and simulation. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 21(5), 834–849 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ben-Israel, A., Greville, T.: Generalized inverses: theory and applications. Springer-Verlag New-York Inc. (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Hyon, S., Hale, J.G., Cheng, G.: Full-body compliant human-humanoid interaction: Balancing in the presence of unknown external forces. IEEE Trans. on Robotics 23(5), 884–898 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Jiang, W.Y., Liu, A.M., Howard, D.: Optimization of legged robot locomotion by control of foot-force distribution. Transactions of the Institute of Measurement and Control 26(4), 311–323 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Kalakrishnan, M., Buchli, J., Pastor, P., Mistry, M., Schaal, S.: Learning, planning, and control for quadruped locomotion over challenging terrain. International Journal of Robotics Research 30, 236–258 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Klein, C., Kittivatcharapong, S.: Optimal force distribution for the legs of a walking machine with friction cone constraints. IEEE Transactions on Robotics and Automation 6(1), 73–85 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Mistry, M., Buchli, J., Schaal, S.: Inverse dynamics control of floating base systems using orthogonal decomposition. In: Proc. of the 2010 International Conference on Robotics and Automation (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Righetti, L., Buchli, J., Mistry, M., Kalakrishnan, M., Schaal, S.: Optimal distribution of contact forces with inverse dynamics control (submitted)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Righetti, L., Buchli, J., Mistry, M., Schaal, S.: Control of legged robots with optimal distribution of contact forces. In: 2011 11th IEEE-RAS International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids), pp. 318–324 (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Righetti, L., Buchli, J., Mistry, M., Schaal, S.: Inverse Dynamics Control of Floating-Base Robots with External Constraints: a Unified View. In: Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA 2011), pp. 1085–1090 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sentis, L.: Synthesis and control of whole-body behaviors in humanoid systems. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sentis, L., Park, J., Khatib, O.: Compliant control of multi-contact and center of mass behaviors in humanoid robots. IEEE Transactions on Robotics 26(3), 483–501 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Siciliano, B., Sciavicco, L., Villani, L., Oriolo, G.: Robotics: Modelling, Planning and Control. Advanced Textbooks in Control and Signal Processing. Springer, London (2009), doi:10.1007/978-1-84628-642-1Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Stephens, B., Atkeson, C.: Dynamic balance force control for compliant humanoid robots. In: International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems, IROS (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Udwadia, F., Kalaba, R.: On the foundations of analytical dynamics. Int. J. of Non-Linear Mechanics 37, 1079–1090 (2002)MathSciNetzbMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ludovic Righetti
    • 1
  • Jonas Buchli
    • 3
  • Michael Mistry
    • 4
  • Mrinal Kalakrishnan
    • 1
  • Stefan Schaal
    • 2
  1. 1.University of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA
  2. 2.Max-Planck Institute for Intelligent SystemsTübingenGermany
  3. 3.Italian Institute of TechnologyGenoaItaly
  4. 4.University of BirminghamBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations