Advertisement

The Biometric Menagerie – A Fuzzy and Inconsistent Concept

  • Nicolaie Popescu-Bodorin
  • Valentina Emilia Balas
  • Iulia Maria Motoc
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 195)

Abstract

This paper proves that in iris recognition, the concepts of sheep, goats, lambs and wolves - as proposed by Doddington and Yager in the so-called Biometric Menagerie, are at most fuzzy and at least not quite well defined. They depend not only on the users or on their biometric templates, but also on the parameters that calibrate the iris recognition system. This paper shows that, in the case of iris recognition, the extensions of these concepts have very unsharp and unstable (non-stationary) boundaries. The membership of a user to these categories is more often expressed as a degree (as a fuzzy value) rather than as a crisp value. Moreover, they are defined by fuzzy Sugeno rules instead of classical (crisp) definitions. For these reasons, we said that the Biometric Menagerie proposed by Doddington and Yager could be at most a fuzzy concept of biometry, but even this status is conditioned by improving its definition. All of these facts are confirmed experimentally in a series of 12 exhaustive iris recognition tests undertaken for University of Bath Iris Image Database while using three different iris code dimensions (256x16, 128x8 and 64x4), two different iris texture encoders (Log Gabor and Haar Hilbert) and two different types of safety models.

Keywords

iris recognition fuzzy inconsistent biometric menagerie 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Balas, V.E., Motoc, I.M., Barbulescu, A.: Combined Haar-Hilbert and Log-Gabor Based Iris Encoders. In: Balas, V.E., Fodor, J., Varkonyi-Koczy, A. (eds.) New Concepts and Applications in Soft Computing. SCI, vol. 417, pp. 1–26. Springer, Heidelberg (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Doddington, G., Liggett, W., Martin, A., Przybocki, M., Reynolds, D.: Sheep, Goats, Lambs and Wolves. In: A Statistical Analysis of Speaker Performance in the NIST 1998 Speaker Recognition Evaluation. In: Int’l Conf. Spoken Language Processing (ICSLP), Sydney, vol. 4, pp. 1351–1354 (1998)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Iris Challenge Evaluation, N.I.S.T. retired Mars (2011), http://iris.nist.gov/ice/
  4. 4.
    Paone, J., Flynn, P.: On the consistency of the biometric menagerie for irises and iris matchers. In: Proc. IEEE Int. Workshop on Information Forensics and Security (WIFS), pp. 1–6 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Popescu-Bodorin, N.: Exploring New Directions in Iris Recognition. In: 11th International Symposium on Symbolic and Numeric Algorithms for Scientific Computing. Conference Publishing Services – IEEE Computer Society, pp. 384–391 (2009)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Popescu-Bodorin, N., Balas, V.E.: Comparing Haar-Hilbert and Log-Gabor based iris encoders on Bath Iris Image Database. In: Proc. 4th Int. Work. on Soft Computing Apps., pp. 191–196. IEEE Press (2010)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Popescu-Bodorin, N.: Processing Toolbox for the University of Bath Iris Image Database, PT-UBIID-v.02 (2010), http://fmi.spiruharet.ro/bodorin/pt-ubiid/
  8. 8.
    Popescu-Bodorin, N., Balas, V.E., Motoc, I.M.: 8-Valent Fuzzy Logic for Iris Recognition and Biometry. In: Proc. 5th IEEE Int. Symp. on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, Floriana, Malta, September 15-17, pp. 149–154. IEEE Press (2011)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Popescu-Bodorin, N., Balas, V.E., Motoc, I.M.: Iris Codes Classification Using Discriminant and Witness Directions. In: Proc. 5th IEEE Int. Symp. on Computational Intelligence and Intelligent Informatics, Floriana, Malta, September 15-17, pp. 143–148. IEEE Press (2011)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
  11. 11.
    Sugeno, M., Yasukawa, T.: A Fuzzy-Logic-Based Approach to Qualitative Modeling. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems 1(1), 7–31 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Yager, N., Dunstone, T.: The biometric menagerie. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence 32(2), 220–230 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zadeh, L.A.: A New Direction in AI - Toward a Computational Theory of Perceptions. AI Magazine 22(1), 73–84 (2001)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zadeh, L.A.: Toward extended fuzzy logic A first step. Fuzzy Sets and Systems 160, 3175–3181 (2009)MathSciNetMATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nicolaie Popescu-Bodorin
    • 1
  • Valentina Emilia Balas
    • 2
  • Iulia Maria Motoc
    • 1
  1. 1.Artificial Intelligence & Computational Logic Lab., Mathematics & Computer Science DepartmentSpiru Haret UniversityBucharestRomania
  2. 2.Automatics and Applied Software Department, Faculty of EngineeringAurel Vlaicu UniversityAradRomania

Personalised recommendations