Advertisement

Design an Optimal Fuzzy PID Controller for Herbal Machine Harvester with Gripping-Belt Speed

  • Behnam Yavari
  • Seyed Hamidreza Abbasi
  • Faridoon Shabaninia
Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 195)

Abstract

Today fuzzy logic is used to solve various engineering issues. In this paper a novel approach for tuning the PID controller for Gripping-Belt of Herbal machine Harvester speed control is proposed. Designing the values of proportional, integral and derivative constants are divided into three stages one for each constant. The Optimal Fuzzy system identifies the constants at each stage. The Kp, Ki and Kd are set by the optimized fuzzy logic controller to improve the performance of rise time, peak overshoot, oscillation and the settling time. Gripping-belt for herbal machine harvester with the control issues were discussed, given the gripping-belt approximation model with a control system using Matlab/Simulink and Fuzzy Logic Toolbox software kit built with herbal medicine harvester holding a simulation model and controller. The control system of the conventional fuzzy control, PID control and optimal fuzzy self-tuning PID control simulation results show that the optimal fuzzy self-tuning PID control for better dynamic response to achieve the desired control effect.

Keywords

Herbal machine harvester Optimal fuzzy PID controller Simulation Speed control SQP algorithm 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Huang, J., Wang, J.: The research of fuzzy self-tuning PID in chinese traditional herbal harvester with gripping belt speed. In: Proc. of Int. Conf. on Electronic & Mechanical Engineering and Information Technology, Jiamusi, China, August 12-14, pp. 2019–2024 (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Kennedy, J.: Force Control of Hydraulic Servo System Master of Science Dissertation, Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri (May 2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lewis, F.L., Syrmos, V.L.: Optimal Control, 3rd edn. J. Wiely, New Jersey (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Nocedal, J., Wright, S.J.: Numerical Optimization. Springer, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Rustem, B.: Algorithms for Nonlinear Programming and Multi-Objective Decisions. Princeton University Press, New Jersey (2002)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tang, K.S., Man, K.F., Chen, G., Kwong, S.: An Optimal Fuzzy PID Controller. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, Journals & Magazines, 757–765 (August 2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Xing, W.C.: Hydraulic Control System, pp. 67–100. Machine Press, Beijing (2009)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Yu, C.C.: Autotuning of PID Controllers. Springer (2006)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Behnam Yavari
    • 1
  • Seyed Hamidreza Abbasi
    • 1
  • Faridoon Shabaninia
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Electrical and Computer EngineeringShiraz UniversityShirazIran

Personalised recommendations