Robot Colony Mobility in a Thermodynamics Frame

Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 194)

Abstract

In the last decade the development of multirobot systems has come to maturation providing a lot of important results in many applicative domains. Many paradigms and approaches have been devised to this aim but one of them seems very promising for future applications: dense colony of robots where the large numbers of individuals is combined with a very small dimension for each of them. Here, the key point is a behavior-based paradigm embedded in the mobiligence framework as it appears particularly suitable to deal with the sensing activity where the physics of the interaction is made explicit to take advantage from it. Within this point of view the paper explores a design method to deal with sensor information which, avoiding any symbolic representation, is maintained at a somewhat physical level as a metaphor of the events observed in the environment. The idea of substratum is introduced as a convenient representation of the physical level currently in use. The key properties of the thermal metaphor are considered and implemented to trigger appropriately a colony of robots to execute a collective task. The temperature distribution, heat flux, diffusivity and dispersion are all discussed as different aspects of the stigmergy included as a key feature of the swarm which forces each individual to behave collectively.

Keywords

roboticle mobiligence robot coordination stigmergy thermal metaphor 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Arkin, R.: Behavior-Based Robotics. The MIT Press (1998)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Asama, H., Yano, M., Tsuchiya, K., Ito, K., Yuasa, H., Ota, J., Ishiguro, A., Kondo, T.: System principle on emergence of mobiligence and its engineering realization. In: IROS 2003, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 1715–1720 (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    D’Angelo, A., Funato, T., Pagello, E.: Motion control of dense robot colony using thermodynamics. In: DARS 2008, pp. 85–96. Springer, Tsukuba (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    D’Angelo, A., Ota, J., Pagello, E.: How intelligent behavior can emerge from a group of roboticles moving around. In: IROS 2003, Las Vegas, NV, pp. 1733–1738 (2003)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    D’Angelo, A., Pagello, E.: Making collective behaviours to work through implicit communication. In: Casals, A., Dillmann, R., Giralt, G. (eds.) ICRA 2005, Barcelona, pp. 81–87 (2005)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    D’Angelo, A., Pagello, E.: From mobility to autopoiesis: acquiring environmental information to deliver commands to the effectors. In: IAS 2009, pp. 640–647. IOS Press, Tokyo (2006)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    D’Angelo, A., Pagello, E.: A thermodynamic framework for robot colony control. In: IAS 2011, pp. 259–270. IOS Press, Ottawa (2010)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    D’Angelo, A., Pagello, E., Yuasa, H.: Issues on autonomous agents from a roboticle perspective. Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems, 389–416 (2008)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kohonen, T.: Self-Organizing Maps, Information Sciences, vol. 30. Springer (2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Latombe, J.C.: Robot Motion Planning. Springer (1991)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kinoshita, M., Watanabe, M., Kawakami, T., Yokoi, H., Kakazu, Y.: Macroscopic quantitative observation of multi-robot behavior. In: Computational Intelligence and Multimedia Applications, Yokosuka, Japan, pp. 190–194 (2001)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pisokas, J., Nehmzow, U.: Subsymbolic action planning for robots: Generalised representations of experience. In: Groen, F., Amato, N., Bonarini, A., Yoshida, E., Krose, B. (ed.) 8th Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems, pp. 666–673. IOS Press (2004)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jantz, S.D., Doty, K.L., Bagnell, J.A., Zapata, I.R.: Kinetics of robotics: The development of universal metrics in robotic swarms. In: Florida Conference on Recent Advances in Robotics, Miami, USA (1997)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Weser, M., Jockel, S., Zhang, J.: Fuzzy multisensor fusion for autonomous proactive robot perception. In: IEEE International Conference on Fuzzy Systems, pp. 2262–2267 (2008)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kerr, W., Spears, D., Spears, W., Thayer, D.: Two Formal Gas Models for Multi-agent Sweeping and Obstacle Avoidance. In: Hinchey, M.G., Rash, J.L., Truszkowski, W.F., Rouff, C.A. (eds.) FAABS 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3228, pp. 111–130. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Dept. of Mathematics and Computer ScienceUniv. of UdineUdineItaly
  2. 2.IAS-Lab, Dept. of Information EngineeringUniv. of PaduaPaduaItaly

Personalised recommendations