Advertisement

Towards Metareasoning for Human-Robot Interaction

  • Xiaoping Chen
  • Zhiqiang Sui
  • Jianmin Ji
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 194)

Abstract

This paper proposes a model of metareasoning for Human-Robot Interaction (HRI). Robots’ basic abilities for HRI—planning, learning and dialogue—are characterized as three loops in the model, with each spanning ground, object and meta-level. The model provides a conceptualization of HRI and a framework for incremental development of large HRI systems such as service robots by building meta-level functions on top of existing ground/object level components. A case-study focusing on meta-level control shows that the approach is effective and efficient for some application domains. In particular, meta-level control suggests a new opportunity to speed up planning while preserving completeness without any change to object level planners. The experiments also show that, for some basic HRI tasks, there are simple meta-level strategies with performances better than the common strategy in previous work.

Keywords

HRI metareasoning modeling meta-level scheduling 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Asoh, H., Motomura, Y., Asano, F., Hara, I., Hayamizu, S., Itou, K., Kurita, T., Matsui, T., Vlassis, N., Bunschoten, R., et al.: Jijo-2: An office robot that communicates and learns. IEEE Intelligent Systems 16(5), 46–55 (2001)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bauer, A., Wollherr, D., Buss, M.: Human-robot collaboration: A survey. International Journal of Humanoid Robotics 5(1), 47–66 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Brenner, M., Nebel, B.: Continual planning and acting in dynamic multiagent environments. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems 19(3), 297–331 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Carlin, A., Zilberstein, S.: Decentralized monitoring of distributed anytime algorithms. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2011), pp. 157–164 (2011)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, X., Ji, J., Jiang, J., Jin, G., Wang, F., Xie, J.: Developing high-level cognitive functions for service robots. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2010), pp. 989–996 (2010)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chen, X., Jiang, J., Ji, J., Jin, G., Wang, F.: Integrating nlp with reasoning about actions for autonomous agents communicating with humans. In: Proceedings of the 2009 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Joint Conference on Web Intelligence and Intelligent Agent Technology (IAT 2009), pp. 137–140 (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cox, M., Raja, A.: Metareasoning: A manifesto. Technical Memo 2028, BBN (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fong, T., Thorpe, C., Baur, C.: Robot, asker of questions. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 42(3-4), 235–243 (2003)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Fong, T.W., Thorpe, C., Baur, C.: Collaboration, dialogue, and human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium of Robotics Research, pp. 255–266. Springer (November 2001)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ghallab, M., Howe, A., Christianson, D., McDermott, D., Ram, A., Veloso, M., Weld, D., Wilkins, D.: Pddl—the planning domain definition language. In: AIPS 1998 Planning Committee, vol. 78(4), pp. 1–27 (1998)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaupp, T., Makarenko, A., Durrant-Whyte, H.: Human-robot communication for collaborative decision making–a probabilistic approach. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 58(5), 444–456 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Nardi, D., Dessimoz, J., Dominey, P., Iocchi, L., Rybski, P., Savage, J., Schiffer, S., Wisspeintner, T., van der Zant, T., Yazdani, A.: Robocup@home: Rules and regulations (2008)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Rosenthal, S., Biswas, J., Veloso, M.: An effective personal mobile robot agent through symbiotic human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems (AAMAS 2010), pp. 915–922 (2010)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rosenthal, S., Veloso, M.M., Dey, A.K.: Learning accuracy and availability of humans who help mobile robots. In: Proceedings of the 25th AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence (AAAI 2011), pp. 1501–1506 (2011)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Thrun, S.: Toward a framework for human-robot interaction. Human–Computer Interaction 19(1-2), 9–24 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.University of Science and Technology of ChinaHefeiP.R. China
  2. 2.The Hong Kong University of Science and TechnologyHong KongP.R. China

Personalised recommendations