Skip to main content

Competition Policy in Africa

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2013

Part of the book series: European Yearbook of International Economic Law ((volume 4))

Abstract

During the past two decades, many African countries have adopted competition policy as an important instrument of economic and, more specifically, market governance. The proliferation of competition policy regimes in Africa has taken place during a phase of broad-based economic liberalisation, including trade liberalisation, and domestic economic reforms such as privatisation. In some cases, these reforms were part of structural adjustment programmes, were supported by the International Monetary Fund and the World Bank, and in other cases the economic adjustment programmes were homegrown. The World Trade Organisation (WTO) was established in 1995 after the conclusion of the Uruguay Round of Multilateral trade negotiations. The first WTO Ministerial Conference, held in Singapore in 1996, brought new generation trade issues, including competition policy, on to the multilateral trade agenda. However, at the 2003 Cancun Ministerial Conference, competition was dropped from the Doha Development Agenda, following debates among developing countries about the benefits of a competition regime. Despite the fact that competition no longer features on the multilateral trade agenda, many regional trade agreements include provisions on competition. In many cases, the provisions cover cooperation in competition enforcement. Perhaps the most important experience to date has been in the context of the negotiations with the European Union to conclude Economic Partnership Agreements. Many countries have still to conclude these negotiations; the provisions being discussed focus specifically on cooperation in enforcement. However, in Africa, there are several regional integration arrangements that provide for a regional competition law and the establishment of a regional competition authority.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    It is important to keep in mind that there may be other policies that may impact more directly on some of the public interest issues included in competition policy. The risk of policy-overload, especially if policy is effectively enforced, needs to be considered carefully. Policy complementarities and coherence are important principles to consider.

  2. 2.

    These annexes provide a summary of competition law and policy in Africa; the delineation into sub-regions is done for convenience, rather than following the regional economic groupings since there is significant membership overlap amongst these.

  3. 3.

    Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC), ‘Our background’, 2012, available at: http://www.ccpc.org.zm/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=90&Itemid=96.

  4. 4.

    Republic of Zambia Ministry of Commerce, Trade and Industry, Draft Competition and Consumer Protection Policy, 2009, available at: http://www.ccpc.org.zm/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=20&Itemid=51.

  5. 5.

    Competition and Fair Trading Act, Chapter 417 of the Laws of Zambia of 1994.

  6. 6.

    Republic of Zambia Ministry of Commerce, Trade and Industry, Draft Competition and Consumer Protection Policy, 2009, available at: http://www.ccpc.org.zm/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=20&Itemid=51.

  7. 7.

    Preamble of the Competition and Fair Trading Act.

  8. 8.

    Republic of Zambia Ministry of Commerce, Trade and Industry, Draft Competition and Consumer Protection Policy, 2009, available at: http://www.ccpc.org.zm/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=20&Itemid=51.

  9. 9.

    Republic of Zambia Ministry of Commerce, Trade and Industry, Draft Competition and Consumer Protection Policy, 2009, available at: http://www.ccpc.org.zm/index.php?option=com_docman&task=doc_download&gid=20&Itemid=51.

  10. 10.

    International Chamber of Commerce (ICC) Commission on Competition, Recommended framework for international best practices in competition law enforcement proceedings, Paris: ICC, Document No. 225/666, 2010, available at: http://www.iccwbo.org/uploadedFiles/ICC/policy/competition/pages/ICC%20International%20Due%20process%2008%2003%2010%20FINAL.pdf.

  11. 11.

    Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC), 2012, available at: http://www.ccpc.org.zm/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=90&Itemid=96.

  12. 12.

    § 3(1) Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  13. 13.

    § 8 Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  14. 14.

    § 19(2) Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  15. 15.

    § 16 Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  16. 16.

    § 38 Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  17. 17.

    § 24(1) Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  18. 18.

    As stipulated in the Competition and Consumer Protection (General) Regulations, 2011, contained in Statutory Instrument No. 97 of 2011 dated 19 August 2011.

  19. 19.

    § 27(1) Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  20. 20.

    § 29 Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  21. 21.

    § 30 Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  22. 22.

    § 31 Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  23. 23.

    Preamble of the Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  24. 24.

    Lingela, Balancing competition and the public interest, 2012, available at: http://www.ccpc.org.zm/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=117:balancing-competition-a-the-public-interest&catid=47:articles&Itemid=128.

  25. 25.

    §§ 45-46 Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  26. 26.

    §§ 47-49, 52 Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  27. 27.

    Preamble of the Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  28. 28.

    § 5 Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  29. 29.

    United States Agency for International Development (USAID) and Agribusiness Commercial Legal and Institutional Reform (AgCLIR), Legal and Institutional Reform in Zambia’s Agricultural Sector, 2011, available at: http://www.fintrac.com/cpanelx_pu/EAT/15_33_7791_Zambia%20AgCLIR.pdf.

  30. 30.

    Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC), ‘Welcome to CCPC’, 2012 available at: http://www.ccpc.org.zm.

  31. 31.

    United States Agency for International Development and Agribusiness Commercial Legal and Institutional Reform, Legal and Institutional Reform in Zambia’s Agricultural Sector, 2011, available at: http://www.fintrac.com/cpanelx_pu/EAT/15_33_7791_Zambia%20AgCLIR.pdf.

  32. 32.

    § 60 Competition and Consumer Protection Act.

  33. 33.

    Competition and Consumer Protection Commission (CCPC), ‘Our background’, 2012, available at: http://www.ccpc.org.zm/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=90&Itemid=96.

  34. 34.

    United States Agency for International Development and Agribusiness Commercial Legal and Institutional Reform, Legal and Institutional Reform in Zambia’s Agricultural Sector, 2011, available at: http://www.fintrac.com/cpanelx_pu/EAT/15_33_7791_Zambia%20AgCLIR.pdf.

  35. 35.

    Abdel Latif/Ghoneim, Competition, Competition Policy and Economic Efficiency in the MENA Region: The Case of Egypt, International Development Research Centre, 2005, available at: http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/26939/1/124654.pdf.

  36. 36.

    Ghoneim, Egypt, in: Mehta (ed.), Competition Regimes in the World – A Civil Society Report, 2006, available at: http://competitionregimes.com/pdf/book/africa/42-egypt.pdf.

  37. 37.

    Rasromani, “Regulating a free market: Competition Authority formation underway,” Daily News Egypt, 8 February 2006, available at: http://www.dailystaregypt.com/article.aspx?ArticleID=590.

  38. 38.

    Abdel Latif/Ghoneim, Competition, Competition Policy and Economic Efficiency in the MENA Region: The Case of Egypt, International Development Research Centre, 2005, available at: http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/26939/1/124654.pdf. The Consumer Protection Law, No. 67 of 2006, entered into force in May 2006. It is accompanied by a set of Executive Regulations. The law created the Consumer Protection Agency (CPA) as the supervisory authority in charge of enforcing the law.

  39. 39.

    Prime Ministerial Decree No. 1316 of 2005 issuing the Executive Regulations of Protection of Competition and Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law No. 3 of 2005.

  40. 40.

    Law No. 190 of 2008 Amending Certain Provisions of the Law on Protection of Competition and Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices promulgated by Law No. 3 of 2005; Law No. 193 of 2008 adding a new article numbered (26) to the Law on Protection of Competition and Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices promulgated by Law No. 3 of 2005; Prime Ministerial Decree No. 2957 of 2010 to Amend Some Provisions of the Executive Regulations of Protection of Competition and Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law No. 3 of 2005.

  41. 41.

    Egypt State Information Service (SIS), “Egypt’s cabinet approved amendments of anti-monopoly law,” 27 September 2011, available at: http://www.sis.gov.eg/en/Story.aspx?sid=58147.

  42. 42.

    § 1 Protection of Competition and the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law; § 2 Executive Regulations.

  43. 43.

    § 2(a) Protection of Competition and the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law.

  44. 44.

    Abdel Latif/Ghoneim, Competition, Competition Policy and Economic Efficiency in the MENA Region: The Case of Egypt, International Development Research Centre, 2005, available at: http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/26939/1/124654.pdf.

  45. 45.

    Trade-Related Assistance Centre (TRAC), Competition Policy and Law in Egypt: Report on the Seminar, 2006, available at: http://www.amcham-egypt.org/Trac/reports/Competition_Law_Dec_2006.pdf.

  46. 46.

    § 5 Protection of Competition and the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law; § 3 Executive Regulations.

  47. 47.

    § 6 Executive Regulations.

  48. 48.

    Trade-Related Assistance Centre, Competition Policy and Law in Egypt: Report on the Seminar, 2006, available at: http://www.amcham-egypt.org/Trac/reports/Competition_Law_Dec_2006.pdf.

  49. 49.

    Egyptian Competition Authority (ECA), Annual Report 2006–2007, 2008, available at: http://www.eca.org.eg/ECA/upload/Publication/Attachment_A/15/annual%20report%20english.pdf.

  50. 50.

    § 12 Executive Regulations.

  51. 51.

    § 4 Protection of Competition and the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law; § 7 Executive Regulations.

  52. 52.

    § 13 Executive Regulations.

  53. 53.

    Egyptian Competition Authority, Frequently Asked Questions, 2012, available at: http://www.eca.org.eg/ECA/StaticContent/View.aspx?ID=14.

  54. 54.

    Trade-Related Assistance Centre, Competition Policy and Law in Egypt: Report on the Seminar, 2006, available at: http://www.amcham-egypt.org/Trac/reports/Competition_Law_Dec_2006.pdf.

  55. 55.

    § 19 Protection of Competition and the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law; §§ 44-45 Executive Regulations.

  56. 56.

    Egyptian Competition Authority, Frequently Asked Questions, 2012, available at: http://www.eca.org.eg/ECA/StaticContent/View.aspx?ID=14.

  57. 57.

    § 9 Protection of Competition and the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law; § 15 Executive Regulations.

  58. 58.

    § 10 Protection of Competition and the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law; §§ 18-20 Executive Regulations.

  59. 59.

    Abdel Latif/Ghoneim, Competition, Competition Policy and Economic Efficiency in the MENA Region: The Case of Egypt, International Development Research Centre, 2005, available at: http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/26939/1/124654.pdf.

  60. 60.

    Trade-Related Assistance Centre, Competition Policy and Law in Egypt: Report on the Seminar, 2006, available at: http://www.amcham-egypt.org/Trac/reports/Competition_Law_Dec_2006.pdf.

  61. 61.

    § 11 Protection of Competition and the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law.

  62. 62.

    Authorised through Decree No. 571/2006 to exercise the Prime Minister’s powers stipulated under the Law.

  63. 63.

    § 12 Protection of Competition and the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law.

  64. 64.

    Trade-Related Assistance Centre, Competition Policy and Law in Egypt: Report on the Seminar, 2006, available at: http://www.amcham-egypt.org/Trac/reports/Competition_Law_Dec_2006.pdf.

  65. 65.

    Trade-Related Assistance Centre, Competition Policy and Law in Egypt: Report on the Seminar, 2006, available at: http://www.amcham-egypt.org/Trac/reports/Competition_Law_Dec_2006.pdf.

  66. 66.

    §§ 35-43 Executive Regulations.

  67. 67.

    § 19 Protection of Competition and the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law. The procedures for initiating such complaints are contained in §§ 31-32 Executive Regulations.

  68. 68.

    § 20 Protection of Competition and the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law.

  69. 69.

    § 20 Protection of Competition and the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law.

  70. 70.

    Trade-Related Assistance Centre, Competition Policy and Law in Egypt: Report on the Seminar, 2006, available at: http://www.amcham-egypt.org/Trac/reports/Competition_Law_Dec_2006.pdf.

  71. 71.

    § 43 Executive Regulations.

  72. 72.

    § 22 Protection of Competition and the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law.

  73. 73.

    § 21 Protection of Competition and the Prohibition of Monopolistic Practices Law.

  74. 74.

    See Competition Act of the Republic of South Africa, 1998, Chapter 4.

  75. 75.

    Competition Commission, Functions, available at: http://www.compcom.co.za/aboutus/aboutus_competition_commission_function.asp?level=3&child=2&desc=9.

  76. 76.

    Republic of South Africa, Maintenance and Promotion of Competition Act 96 of 1979, available at: http://www.compcom.co.za/thelaw/thelaw_act_maintenance.asp?level=1&child=3.

  77. 77.

    Republic of South Africa, Maintenance and Promotion of Competition Act 96 of 1979, available at: http://www.compcom.co.za/thelaw/thelaw_act_maintenance.asp?level=1&child=3.

  78. 78.

    See Republic of South Africa Competition Tribunal, Case 72/CR/Dec03, Nationwide Poles and Sasol (Oil) Pty Ltd, 2005, available at: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACT/2005/17.pdf (describing a case of alleged price discrimination referred by a complainant to the Tribunal after a non-referral decision by the Commission.); see also Republic of South Africa Competition Appeal Court, Case 49/CAC/Apr05, Sasol Oil (Pty) Ltd vs. Nationwide Poles CC, 2005, available at: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACAC/2005/5.pdf (overturning the Competition Tribunal).

  79. 79.

    The Commission has first-instance jurisdiction over smaller mergers. See Competition Act of the Republic of South Africa, 1998, Chapter 4, Sec. 21.

  80. 80.

    Competition Act of the Republic of South Africa, 1998, Chapter 2 (Prohibited Practices), Chapter 3 (Merger Control).

  81. 81.

    Competition Act of the Republic of South Africa, 1998, Chapter 4 (Part B).

  82. 82.

    Lewis, The Objectives of Competition Law and Policy and the Optimal Design of a Competition Agency, presented at the OECD Global Forum on Competition, 10–11 February 2003, p. 4.

  83. 83.

    Lewis, The Objectives of Competition Law and Policy and the Optimal Design of a Competition Agency, presented at the OECD Global Forum on Competition, 10–11 February 2003, p. 4.

  84. 84.

    Republic of South Africa Competition Tribunal, Cases 49/CR/Apr00 and 87/CR/Sep00, Competition Commission and Botswana Ash (Pty) Ltd, 2001, available at: http://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACT/2001/46.pdf (ruling on the effect of an American export cartel of soda ash to Botswana).

  85. 85.

    For more detail on the Southern African Customs Union, see the 2002 Customs Union Agreement, available at: http//www.tralac.org/scripts/content.php?id=3031.

  86. 86.

    UNCTAD, 2000, op. cit.

  87. 87.

    UNCTAD, 2000, op. cit.

  88. 88.

    The decision of the Competition Appeal Court is available on the Competition Tribunal website at: http://www.comptrib.co.za.

  89. 89.

    Details of the corporate leniency programme and application forms for the programme are available on the Competition Commission website at: http://www.compcom.co.za/corporate-leniency-policy.

  90. 90.

    The RECs that have been identified as building blocks by the African Union for the AEC are the Southern African Development Community (SADC), the East Africa Community (EAC), the Common Market for East and Southern Africa (COMESA), the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS), the Intergovernmental Authority on Development (IGAD), the Economic Community of Central African States (ECCAS), the Community of Sahel-Saharan States (CEN-SAD) and Arab Maghreb Union (AMU).

  91. 91.

    Competition matters are covered differently in the RECS; for example, this may be found in the Treaty or Agreement or in a Protocol on Trade or a separate legal instrument.

  92. 92.

    South Africa, Botswana, Lesotho, Namibia and Swaziland are members of SACU.

  93. 93.

    Information on the development of the Annexes is available on the SACU Secretariat’s website at: http://www.sacu.int/policy.php?id=409.

  94. 94.

    Angola, Botswana, Democratic Republic of the Congo, Lesotho, Namibia, Swaziland, Zambia, Zimbabwe, Tanzania, Malawi, Seychelles, Mauritius, and Mozambique are members of SADC. Madagascar is the fifteenth member, but currently suspended.

  95. 95.

    The Member States of ECOWAS are Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Sierra Leone, Cameroon, Côte d’Ivoire, The Gambia, Ghana, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Liberia, Mali, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal and Togo.

  96. 96.

    Burundi, Comoros, the Democratic Republic of Congo, Djibouti, Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Libya, Madagascar, Mauritius, Rwanda, Seychelles, Sudan, Swaziland, Uganda, Zambia, Zimbabwe, the Republics of the Egypt and Malawi are members of COMESA.

  97. 97.

    The COMESA Treaty is available on the COMESA website at: http://about.comesa.int/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=77&Itemid=116.

  98. 98.

    The COMESA Competition Regulations are available at: http://www.tralac.org/wp-content/blogs.dir/12/files/2011/uploads/COMESACompetitionRegulations.pdf.

  99. 99.

    The COMESA Competition Commission’s website is http://www.comesacompetition.org. This portal provides information on the scope of regional competition matters as well as guides for business and consumers on accessing competition law in COMESA.

  100. 100.

    The South African competition authorities were instrumental in the establishment of the Southern and Eastern African Competition Forum (SEACF), involving Kenya, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Seychelles, Swaziland, Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe and the Secretariats of SADC and COMESA. The objective of a SEACF in the SADC region is to create a coherent group of countries in the region to assist countries in the development of competition policies and establishment of competition agencies.

  101. 101.

    CUTS Centre for Competition, Investment & Economic Regulation (CUTS CCIER), Broad-based support key to competition enforcement in Africa, ReguLetter 12 (2011) 1, p. 1, available online at: http://www.cuts-ccier.org/pdf/reguletter1-11.pdf.

  102. 102.

    The concept of a competition “Forum,” as opposed to a “programme,” brings with it the idea of something more visible, permanent, and dynamic, and perhaps a requirement for formal membership and related terms of reference. Such a forum would bring together various experiences, achievements, challenges, and competencies, and could provide a useful platform for the sharing of ideas and knowledge; refocusing the direction of a vision, mission, or strategic direction of participating members; as well as allowing for common research into competition law and policy reform issues. See Kaira, The possibility of establishing an Africa Competition Forum, Presentation prepared for the Workshop on Competition Law and Policy in African Small States, 26–27 July 2010.

  103. 103.

    Department for International Development (DFID), Eliminating world poverty: Building our common future, White Paper Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for International Development, 2009.

  104. 104.

    Department for International Development (DFID), Eliminating world poverty: Building our common future, White Paper Presented to Parliament by the Secretary of State for International Development, 2009, p. 34.

  105. 105.

    Kaira, The possibility of establishing an Africa Competition Forum, Presentation prepared for the Workshop on Competition Law and Policy in African Small States, 26–27 July 2010; Small States Network for Economic Development (SSNED) and Namibian Competition Commission (NCC), Final Report. Prepared for the Workshop on Competition Law and Policy in African Small States: Small-Size Constraints, Institution Design and Regional Cooperation, 26–27 July 2010, Project ref: WK NMB 01, available at: http://www.ssned.org/file.aspx?f=539.

  106. 106.

    Kaira, The possibility of establishing an Africa Competition Forum, Presentation prepared for the Workshop on Competition Law and Policy in African Small States, 26–27 July 2010; Small States Network for Economic Development (SSNED) and Namibian Competition Commission (NCC), Final Report. Prepared for the Workshop on Competition Law and Policy in African Small States: Small-Size Constraints, Institution Design and Regional Cooperation, 26–27 July 2010, Project ref: WK NMB 01, available at: http://www.ssned.org/file.aspx?f=539.

  107. 107.

    Kaira, The possibility of establishing an Africa Competition Forum, Presentation prepared for the Workshop on Competition Law and Policy in African Small States, 26–27 July 2010.

  108. 108.

    Kaira, The possibility of establishing an Africa Competition Forum, Presentation prepared for the Workshop on Competition Law and Policy in African Small States, 26–27 July 2010.

  109. 109.

    The needs assessment report indicated that assistance required by African agencies would include strategic planning and management, practical aspects of competition law enforcement such as investigative and litigation skills and techniques, foundational training on the basics of competition law and economics, technical assistance in drafting competition policy, laws and regulations and in designing agency procedures, guidelines, and operational manuals, and advocacy and engagement with other stakeholders. It is cited in CUTS Centre for Competition, Investment & Economic Regulation, Broad-based support key to competition enforcement in Africa, ReguLetter 12 (2011) 1, p. 1, available online at: http://www.cuts-ccier.org/pdf/reguletter1-11.pdf.

  110. 110.

    Competition Commission of South Africa, African Competition Forum launched in Nairobi, Press release of 8 March 2011, available at: http://www.compcom.co.za/assets/Uploads/AttachedFiles/MyDocuments/ACF-Launch-Conference-press-release-final.pdf.

  111. 111.

    Remarks by Angel Gurría, OECD Secretary-General, at the opening of the eleventh meeting of the OECD Global Forum on Competition, Paris, 16–17 February 2012, available at: http://www.oecd.org/document/61/0,3746,en_21571361_44315115_49692733_1_1_1_1,00.html.

  112. 112.

    Kaira, The possibility of establishing an Africa Competition Forum, Presentation prepared for the Workshop on Competition Law and Policy in African Small States, 26–27 July 2010.

  113. 113.

    Competition Commission of South Africa, African Competition Forum launched in Nairobi, Press release of 8 March 2011, available at: http://www.compcom.co.za/assets/Uploads/AttachedFiles/MyDocuments/ACF-Launch-Conference-press-release-final.pdf.

  114. 114.

    Kaira, The possibility of establishing an Africa Competition Forum, Presentation prepared for the Workshop on Competition Law and Policy in African Small States, 26–27 July 2010.

  115. 115.

    Kaira, The possibility of establishing an Africa Competition Forum, Presentation prepared for the Workshop on Competition Law and Policy in African Small States, 26–27 July 2010.

  116. 116.

    Kaira, The possibility of establishing an Africa Competition Forum, Presentation prepared for the Workshop on Competition Law and Policy in African Small States, 26–27 July 2010.

  117. 117.

    Competition Commission of South Africa, African Competition Forum launched in Nairobi, Press release of 8 March 2011, available at: http://www.compcom.co.za/assets/Uploads/AttachedFiles/MyDocuments/ACF-Launch-Conference-press-release-final.pdf. p. 1.

  118. 118.

    Competition Commission of South Africa, African Competition Forum launched in Nairobi, Press release of 8 March 2011, available at: http://www.compcom.co.za/assets/Uploads/AttachedFiles/MyDocuments/ACF-Launch-Conference-press-release-final.pdf. p. 1, as stated by Uhuru Kenyatta, Kenyan Deputy Prime Minister and Minister of Finance.

  119. 119.

    CUTS Centre for Competition, Investment & Economic Regulation, Broad-based support key to competition enforcement in Africa, ReguLetter 12 (2011) 1, p. 1, available online at: http://www.cuts-ccier.org/pdf/reguletter1-11.pdf.

  120. 120.

    Bakhoum, A dual language in modern competition law? Efficiency approach versus development approach and implications for developing countries, World Competition 34 (2011) 3, p. 495.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Trudi Hartzenberg .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hartzenberg, T. (2013). Competition Policy in Africa. In: Herrmann, C., Krajewski, M., Terhechte, J. (eds) European Yearbook of International Economic Law 2013. European Yearbook of International Economic Law, vol 4. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33917-2_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics