Experience in Serious Games: Between Positive and Serious Experience

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7528)


This paper discusses the conceptual, practical and ethical considerations towards the development of a framework of experience to inform design and assessment of serious games. Towards this, we review the literature on experience in interaction design, HCI, and games, and identify that the dominant focus for design has been, and still remains, on positive and fun experience. In contrast, anything other than positive experience is often loosely and sometimes inappropriately lumped together under the broad label “negative experience” which can imply bad experience and something to be avoided, while at the same time suggesting it’s not useful to design. While work in HCI and the games literature begins to address experience beyond positive, it just scratches the surface. By turning to drama, performance, literature, music, art and film that has shaped experiences and emotion beyond the positive and fun for many years, we describe what experience beyond positive looks like, show how it is not always “uncomfortable” and how it can be classed as entertainment, and argue for the more appropriate term “serious experience”. We propose that the focus for design of interaction and serious games should be an appropriate rhythm between positive and serious experience. Finally, we discuss the importance of the take-away message and positive and serious experience in serious games to linger or resonate post-encounter for players in order to encourage reflection and fulfill purpose, and describe associated ethical concerns and make recommendations for designers, evaluators and practitioners in order to safeguard players/users.


Positive Experience Negative Experience Serious Experience Framework Design Assessment Linger Resonate Reflection 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    Apter, M.J.: Reversal Theory: Motivation, Emotion and Personality. Routledge, London (1989)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arrasvuori, J., Boberg, M., Korhonen, H.: Understanding Playfulness - An Overview of the Revised Playful Experience (PLEX) Framework. In: Proc. of Design & Emotion 2010 Conference, Design and Emotion Society (2010)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bartle, R.A.: “Virtual Worlds: Why People Play” From Massively Multiplayer Game Development 2 (Game Development). In: Alexander, T. (ed.), Charles River Media, Inc., Rockland (2005)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Benford, S., Greenhalgh, C., Giannachi, G., Walker, B., Marshall, J., Rodden, T.: Uncomfortable Interactions. In: ACM SIGCHI 2012 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press (2012)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Blythe, M.A., Overbeeke, K., Monk, A.F., Wright, P.C.: Funology: From Usability to Enjoyment, pp. 31–42. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht (2003)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Boorstin, J.: Making Movies Work: Thinking Like a Filmmaker. Silman-James Press, Beverley Hills (1990)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Brathwaite, B.: Train: How I Dumped Electricity and Learned to Love Design, GDC (2010), Scholar
  8. 8.
    Brathwaite, B.: The Mechanic is the Message,
  9. 9.
    Calleja, G.: Game Design Involvement A Conceptual Model. Games and Culture (2), 236–260 (2007)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cockton, G.: Designing worth is worth designing. In: Proceedings of the 4th Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, NordicCHI 2006, pp. 165–174. ACM Press (2006)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Costello, B., Edmonds, E.: A Study in Play, Pleasure and Interaction Design. In: Designing Pleasurable Products and Interfaces, University of Art and Design Helsinki, pp. 76–91. ACM Press (2007)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Costello, B., Edmonds, E.: A tool for characterizing the experience of play. In: Proceedings of the Sixth Australasian Conference on Interactive Entertainment, Sydney, Australia, pp. 1–10. ACM Press (2007)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Desurvire, H., Caplan, M., Toth, J.: Using Heuristics to Improve the Playability of Games. In: CHI 2004: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. ACM Press, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    ESA. Entertainment Software Association, State of the Industry Report 2000-2001. Entertainment Software Association (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Falstien, N.: Natural Funativity, Gamasutra (2004),
  16. 16.
    Fernandez, A.: Fun Experience with Digital Games: A Model Proposition. In: Leino, O., Wirman, H., Fernandez, A. (eds.) Extending Experiences: Structure, Analysis and Design of Computer Game Player Experience, pp. 181–190. Lapland University Press, Rovaniemi (2008)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Forlizzi, J., Battarbee, K.: Understanding experience in interactive systems. In: DIS 2004: Proceedings of the 5th Conference on Designing Interactive Systems, pp. 261–268. ACM Press, New York (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Ochalla, B.: From Gamasutra Article: June 29 2007, Who Says Video Games Have to be Fun? The Rise of Serious Games (2007),
  19. 19.
    Gaver, B., Martin, H.: Alternatives: exploring information appliances through conceptual design proposals. In: CHI 2000: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 209–216. ACM Press, New York (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Gee, J.P.: Learning by design: games as learning machines. Interactive Educational Multimedia 8, 15–23 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gordon, B.: Can a social game make you cry?,
  22. 22.
    Groos, K.: The Play of Man. William Heinemann, London (1901)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Grodal, T.: Video games and the pleasure of control. In: Zillmann, D., Vorderer, P. (eds.) Media Entertainment: the Psychology of Its Appeal, pp. 197–214. Erlbaum, Mahwah (2000)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Hassenzahl, M., Platz, A., Burmester, M., Lehner, K.: Hedonic and Ergonomic Quality Aspects Determine a Software’s Appeal. In: Proceedings of CHI 2000: Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 201–208. ACM Press, NY (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Hassenzahl, M., Tractinsky, N.: User experience a research agenda. Behaviour and Information Technology 25(2), 91–97 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hassenzahl, M., Diefenbach, S., Göritz, A.: Needs, affect, and interactive products – Facets of user experience. Interacting with Computers 22(5), 353–362 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Henriksen, T.D.: Dimensions in Educational Game-Design: Perspectives on Designing and Implementing Game-Based Learning Processes in the Educational Setting. Paper for Nordic Playground Event (2006)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hopeametsä, H.: 24 Hours in a Bomb Shelter: Player, Character and Immersion in Ground Zero’. In: Montola, M., Stenros, J. (eds.) Playground Worlds, Ropecon (2008)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Höysniemi, J.: Games, user interface and performing arts: International survey on the Dance Dance Revolution game. ACM Computers in Entertainment 4, 2 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Hunicke, R., LeBlanc, M., Zubek, R.: MDA: A Formal Approach to Game Design and Game Research. In: Proceedings of the 19th AAAI Conference, Workshop on Challenges in Game AI. AAAI Press (2004)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hughes, L., Laroche, S.: Perversely Interactive System, Interactive Artwork (2004),
  32. 32.
    Jones, C.: Excerpt from “The Mediated Sensorium”. In: Jones, C.A. (ed.) Sensorium: Embodied Experience, Technology, and Contemporary Art, p. 6. MIT Press (2006)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Jordan, P.W.: Designing Pleasurable Products: An Introduction to the New Human Factors. Taylor & Francis (2000)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Klimmt, C., Rizzo, A., Vorderer, P., Koch, J., Fischer, T.: Experimental evidence for suspense as determinant of video game enjoyment. Cyberpsychology 12, 29–31 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Koster, R.: A Theory of Fun in Game Design. Paraglyph Press (2005)Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    Law, X.E., Roto, C.V., Hassenzahl, M., Vermeeren, A.P., Kort, J.: Understanding, scoping and defining user experience: a survey approach. In: CHI 2009: Proceedings of the 27th International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 719–728. ACM Press, New York (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Lazzarro, N.: Why We Play Games: Four Keys to More Emotion Without Story, XEODesign report, XeoDesign Inc. (2004),
  38. 38.
    Malone, T.W.: Toward a theory of intrinsically motivating instruction. Cognitive Science 4, 333–369 (1981)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Malone, T.W.: Heuristics for designing enjoyable user interfaces: Lessons from computer games. In: Thomas, J.C., Schneider, M.L. (eds.) Human Factors in Computer Systems. Ablex, Norwood (1984)Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Marsh, T., Wright, P.: Maintaining the Illusion of Interacting Within a 3D Virtual Space. In: 3rd International Workshop on Presence, Delft, The Netherlands (2000)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Marsh, T.: Presence as Experience: Framework to Assess Virtual Corpsing. In: 4th International Workshop on Presence, Temple University, Philadelphia (2001)Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Marsh, T., Wright, P., Smith, S.: Evaluation for the Design of Experience in Virtual Environments: Modelling Breakdown of Interaction and Illusion. Journal of CyberPsychology and Behaviour, Special Issue on Presence 4(2), 225–238 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Marsh, T.: Presence as experience: film informing ways of staying there. In: Presence, Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, vol. 12(5), pp. 538–549. MIT Press (2003)Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Marsh, T.: Towards Invisible Style of Computer-Mediated Activity: Transparency and Continuity. Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, Human-Computer Interaction (HCI) Group, University of York, UK (2004)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Marsh, T.: Serious Games Continuum: Between games for purpose and experiential environments for purpose. Entertainment Computing 2(2), 61–68 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Marsh, T., Zhiqiang, N.L., Klopfer, E., Chuang, X., Osterweil, S., Haas, J.: Fun and Learning: Blending Design and Development Dimensions in Serious Games Through Narrative and Characters. In: Serious Games and Edutainment Applications, ch. 14, pp. 273–287. Springer (2001a)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Marsh, T., Zhiqiang, N.L., Klopfer, E., Chuang, X., Osterweil, S., Haas, J.: Fun and Learning: The Power of Narrative. In: Foundations of Digital Games 2011 (FDG 2011), Bordeaux, France (2011b)Google Scholar
  48. 48.
    McCarthy, J.P., Wright, P.C.: Technology as Experience. MIT Press (2004)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    McCarthy, J.P., Wright, P.C., Wallace, J., Dearden, A.: The experience of enchantment in human-computer interaction. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing 10(6), 369–378 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Michael, D., Chen, S.: Serious Games: Games that Educate, Train, and Inform. Thomson Course Technology PTR, USA (2006)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Monk, A., Frohlich, D.: Computers and Fun. Personal Technology 3(1), 91 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Montola, M.: The positive negative experience in extreme role-playing. In: Proceedings of Experiencing Games: Games, Play, and Players. 1st Nordic Digra, Sweden (2010)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Nacke, L.E., Grimshaw, N.M., Lindley, C.: More than a feeling: Measurement of sonic user experience and psychophysiology in a first-person shooter game, vol. 22(5), pp. 336–343 (April 2010)Google Scholar
  54. 54.
    Nijis, M.: Run Motherfucker Run, Interactive Artwork (2001/2004),
  55. 55.
    Norman, D.A.: Emotional Design: Why We Love (or Hate) Everyday Things. Basic Books, New York (2004)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Oxford English Dictionary. OED Online. Oxford University Press (2009)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Papert, S.: Hard Fun. online article,
  58. 58.
    Pine II, B.J., Gilmore, J.H.: Welcome to the Experience Economy. Harvard Business Review, p. 97 (July-August 1998)Google Scholar
  59. 59.
    Pine II., B.J., Gilmore, J.H.: The Experience Economy: Work is Theatre & Every Business a Stage. Harvard Business Press, Boston (1999)Google Scholar
  60. 60.
    Poels, K., de Kort, Y., Ijsselsteijn, W.: It is always a lot of fun!: exploring dimensions of digital game experience using focus group methodology. In: Proceedings of the Future Play Conference. ACM Press (2007)Google Scholar
  61. 61.
    Prensky, M.: Fun, play and games: what makes games engaging, In: Digital Game-Based Learning. McGraw-Hill (2001)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Rusch, D.C.: Emotional Design of Computer Games and Fiction Films. In: Computer Games as a Sociocultural Phenomenon: Games Without Frontiers, Wars Without Tears, pp. 22–32. Palgrave Publishers (2008)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Salen, S., Zimmerman, E.: Rules of play: Game design fundamentals. MIT Press (2004)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Schell, J.: The Art of Game Design: A book of lenses. Morgan Kaufman (2008)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Seif El-Nasr, M., Al-Saati, M., Niedenthal, S., Milam, D.: Assassin’s creed: a multi-cultural read. Loading 2(3) (2008)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Van Vliet, H., Mulder, I.: Experience and Design: Trojan Horse or Holy Grail. In: Proceedings of User Experience, Second COST294 International Workshop Held in Conjunction with NordiCHI 2006, pp. 57–62 (2006)Google Scholar
  67. 67.
    Velonaki, M.: Pin Cushion, Interactive Artwork (2000),
  68. 68.
    Wright, P.C., McCarthy, J., Marsh, T.: From Usability to User Experience, Computers and Fun 3. Workshop, University of York, UK. Appears in: Interfaces (46), 4–5 (2000)Google Scholar
  69. 69.
    Zyda, M.: From visual simulation to virtual reality to games. IEEE Computer (September 2005)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Zillman, D.: The psychology of suspense in dramatic exposition. In: Vorderer, P., Wulff, H.J., Friedrichsen, M. (eds.) Suspense: Conceptualizations, Theoretical Analyses, and Empirical Explorations. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., Mahwah (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.James Cook UniversityAustralia
  2. 2.University of New South WalesAustralia

Personalised recommendations