Skip to main content

Factor Proportion, Inter-Sectoral Trade, and Product Life Cycle

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Growth and International Trade

Part of the book series: Springer Texts in Business and Economics ((STBE))

Abstract

This chapter is devoted to work out main propositions of neoclassical trade theory in a temporary equilibrium of the two-country OLG model of the previous chapter. Mathematically spoken, the neoclassical trade theory consists of three lemmas and one proposition: the Stolper-Samuelson Theorem, the Rybczynski Theorem, the Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson Theorem and the Heckscher-Ohlin Theorem. We prove all these theorems by using the log-linear utility functions and the Cobb-Douglas production functions of our basic two-country OLG model without money and government bonds. We illustrate the main claims graphically and provide intuitive explanations for them. We also point out empirical limitations of the factor proportion theory (Leontief paradox) and present theoretical advancements like the neo-factor-proportion theory and the product-cycle hypothesis to cope with the restrictions of the basic theory.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Feenstra (2004, 12) refers to Nike’s sports shoes production which is capital intensive in the USA and labor intensive in Bangladesh.

  2. 2.

    This is the strong version of the Heckscher-Ohlin theorem. The weak version states that under the given conditions (without the assumption on preferences) the factor-abundant country has a comparative advantage in the production of the good that uses this factor intensively.

  3. 3.

    An input–output table indicates the sectoral interdependence of the commodity production in an economy. The more developed an economy, the greater is its sectoral integration. If the capital intensity of an exported final product is to be determined, it is indispensable to include the capital intensities of all intermediate products used as inputs in the production of the final product. Exactly this was done by Leontief by means of the input–output table for the USA.

References

  • Farmer, K., & Vlk, T. (2011). Internationale Ökonomik. Eine Einführung in die Theorie und Empirie der Weltwirtschaft (4th ed.). Vienna: LIT. et al.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R. C. (2004). Advanced international trade: Theory and evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heckscher, E. (1919). The effects of foreign trade on the distribution of income. Economic Tidskrift, 21, 497–512.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, S. (1967). Location of industry and international competitiveness. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, P. R., Obstfeld, M., & Melitz, M. J. (2012). International economics: Theory and policy (9th ed.). Boston: Prentice Hall International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leontief, W. W. (1953). Domestic production and foreign trade: The American capital position re-examined. Economia Internazionale, 7, 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meade, J. E. (1961). A geometry of international trade. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohlin, B. (1933). Interregional and international trade. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohr, R. (1985). Produktzyklustheorie. WiSt, 1, 27–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose, K., & Sauernheimer, K. H. (2006). Theorie der Außenwirtschaft (14th ed.). München: Vahlen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rybczynski, T. M. (1955). Factor endowment and relative commodity prices. Economica, 22, 336–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson, P. A. (1948). International trade and the equalization of factor prices. The Economic Journal, 58, 163–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stolper, W. F., & Samuelson, P. A. (1941). Protection and real wages. Review of Economic Studies, 9, 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vernon, R. (1966). International investment and trade in the product cycle. Quartely Journal of Economics, 80, 190–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zweifel, P., & Heller, R. H. (1992). Internationaler Handel: Theorie und Empirie (2nd ed.). Heidelberg: Physica.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karl Farmer .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2013 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Farmer, K., Schelnast, M. (2013). Factor Proportion, Inter-Sectoral Trade, and Product Life Cycle. In: Growth and International Trade. Springer Texts in Business and Economics. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33669-0_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33669-0_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33668-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33669-0

  • eBook Packages: Business and EconomicsEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics