Skip to main content

Solving Minimal Constraint Networks in Qualitative Spatial and Temporal Reasoning

  • Conference paper
Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7514))

Abstract

The minimal label problem (MLP) (also known as the deductive closure problem) is a fundamental problem in qualitative spatial and temporal reasoning (QSTR). Given a qualitative constraint network Γ, the minimal network of Γ relates each pair of variables (x,y) by the minimal label of (x,y), which is the minimal relation between x,y that is entailed by network Γ. It is well-known that MLP is equivalent to the corresponding consistency problem with respect to polynomial Turing-reductions. This paper further shows, for several qualitative calculi including Interval Algebra and RCC-8 algebra, that deciding the minimality of qualitative constraint networks and computing a solution of a minimal constraint network are both NP-hard problems.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allen, J.F.: Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Commun. ACM 26(11), 832–843 (1983)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. van Beek, P.: Reasoning about qualitative temporal information. Artif. Intell. 58(1-3), 297–326 (1992)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Broxvall, M., Jonsson, P.: Point algebras for temporal reasoning: Algorithms and complexity. Artif. Intell. 149(2), 179–220 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Chandra, P., Pujari, A.K.: Minimality and convexity properties in spatial CSPs. In: ICTAI, pp. 589–593. IEEE Computer Society (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cohn, A.G., Renz, J.: Qualitative spatial reasoning. In: van Harmelen, F., Lifschitz, V., Porter, B. (eds.) Handbook of Knowledge Representation. Elsevier (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  6. Dechter, R.: Constraint processing. Elsevier Morgan Kaufmann (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Drakengren, T., Jonsson, P.: A complete classification of tractability in Allen’s algebra relative to subsets of basic relations. Artif. Intell. 106(2), 205–219 (1998)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Frank, A.U.: Qualitative spatial reasoning with cardinal directions. In: Kaindl, H. (ed.) ÖGAI. Informatik-Fachberichte, vol. 287, pp. 157–167. Springer (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gerevini, A., Saetti, A.: Computing the minimal relations in point-based qualitative temporal reasoning through metagraph closure. Artif. Intell. 175(2), 556–585 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Gottlob, G.: On Minimal Constraint Networks. In: Lee, J. (ed.) CP 2011. LNCS, vol. 6876, pp. 325–339. Springer, Heidelberg (2011)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, S.: On topological consistency and realization. Constraints 11(1), 31–51 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Li, S., Ying, M.: Region Connection Calculus: Its models and composition table. Artif. Intell. 145(1-2), 121–146 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Ligozat, G.: Reasoning about cardinal directions. J. Vis. Lang. Comput. 9(1), 23–44 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Ligozat, G., Renz, J.: What Is a Qualitative Calculus? A General Framework. In: Zhang, C., Guesgen, H.W., Yeap, W.-K. (eds.) PRICAI 2004. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 3157, pp. 53–64. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  15. Liu, W., Zhang, X., Li, S., Ying, M.: Reasoning about cardinal directions between extended objects. Artif. Intell. 174(12-13), 951–983 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Montanari, U.: Networks of constraints: Fundamental properties and applications to picture processing. Inf. Sci. 7, 95–132 (1974)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Nebel, B., Bürckert, H.J.: Reasoning about temporal relations: A maximal tractable subclass of Allen’s Interval Algebra. J. ACM 42(1), 43–66 (1995)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Randell, D.A., Cui, Z., Cohn, A.G.: A spatial logic based on regions and connection. In: KR, pp. 165–176 (1992)

    Google Scholar 

  19. Renz, J., Nebel, B.: On the complexity of qualitative spatial reasoning: A maximal tractable fragment of the Region Connection Calculus. Artif. Intell. 108(1-2), 69–123 (1999)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Vilain, M.B., Kautz, H.A.: Constraint propagation algorithms for temporal reasoning. In: AAAI, pp. 377–382 (1986)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Liu, W., Li, S. (2012). Solving Minimal Constraint Networks in Qualitative Spatial and Temporal Reasoning. In: Milano, M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming. CP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7514. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33558-7_35

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33558-7_35

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33557-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33558-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics