Skip to main content

Consistencies for Ultra-Weak Solutions in Minimax Weighted CSPs Using the Duality Principle

  • Conference paper
Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming (CP 2012)

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Computer Science ((LNPSE,volume 7514))

Abstract

Minimax Weighted Constraint Satisfaction Problems (formerly called Quantified Weighted CSPs) are a framework for modeling soft constrained problems with adversarial conditions. In this paper, we describe novel definitions and implementations of node, arc and full directional arc consistency notions to help reduce search space on top of the basic tree search with alpha-beta pruning for solving ultra-weak solutions. In particular, these consistencies approximate the lower and upper bounds of the cost of a problem by exploiting the semantics of the quantifiers and reusing techniques from both Weighted and Quantified CSPs. Lower bound computation employs standard estimation of costs in the sub-problems used in alpha-beta search. In estimating upper bounds, we propose two approaches based on the Duality Principle: duality of quantifiers and duality of constraints. The first duality amounts to changing quantifiers from min to max , while the second duality re-uses the lower bound approximation functions on dual constraints to generate upper bounds. Experiments on three benchmarks comparing basic alpha-beta pruning and the six consistencies from the two dualities are performed to confirm the feasibility and efficiency of our proposal.

We are grateful to the anonymous referees for their constructive comments. The work described in this paper was generously supported by grants CUHK413808 and CUHK413710 from the Research Grants Council of Hong Kong SAR.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Allis, L.V.: Searching for solutions in games and artificial intelligence. Ph.D. thesis, University of Limburg (1994)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Apt, K.: Principles of Constraint Programming. Cambridge University Press, New York (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Benedetti, M., Lallouet, A., Vautard, J.: Quantified Constraint Optimization. In: Stuckey, P.J. (ed.) CP 2008. LNCS, vol. 5202, pp. 463–477. Springer, Heidelberg (2008)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Bordeaux, L., Cadoli, M., Mancini, T.: CSP properties for quantified constraints: Definitions and complexity. In: AAAI 2005, pp. 360–365 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bordeaux, L., Monfroy, E.: Beyond NP: Arc-Consistency for Quantified Constraints. In: Van Hentenryck, P. (ed.) CP 2002. LNCS, vol. 2470, pp. 371–386. Springer, Heidelberg (2002)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. Brown, K.N., Little, J., Creed, P.J., Freuder, E.C.: Adversarial constraint satisfaction by game-tree search. In: ECAI 2004, pp. 151–155 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  7. Cabon, B., de Givry, S., Lobjois, L., Schiex, T., Warners, J.: Radio link frequency assignment. Constraints 4, 79–89 (1999)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cooper, M.C., de Givry, S., Schiex, T.: Optimal soft arc consistency. In: IJCAI 2007, pp. 68–73 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Cooper, M.C., de Givry, S., Sanchez, M., Schiex, T., Zytnicki, M., Werner, T.: Soft arc consistency revisited. Artificial Intelligence 174(7-8), 449–478 (2010)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Debruyne, R., Bessière, C.: From Restricted Path Consistency to Max-Restricted Path Consistency. In: Smolka, G. (ed.) CP 1997. LNCS, vol. 1330, pp. 312–326. Springer, Heidelberg (1997)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Dempe, S.: Foundations of Bilevel Programming. Kluwer Academic Publishers (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Gent, I.P., Nightingale, P., Stergiou, K.: QCSP-Solve: A solver for quantified constraint satisfaction problems. In: IJCAI 2005, pp. 138–143 (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  13. van den Herik, H.J., Uiterwijk, J.W.H.M., van Rijswijck, J.: Games solved: Now and in the future. Artif. Intell. 134(1-2), 277–311 (2002)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Larrosa, J., Schiex, T.: In the quest of the best form of local consistency for weighted CSP. In: IJCAI 2003, pp. 239–244 (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  15. Larrosa, J., Schiex, T.: Solving weighted CSP by maintaining arc consistency. Artificial Intelligence 159(1-2), 1–26 (2004)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  16. Lee, J.H.M., Mak, T.W.K., Yip, J.: Weighted constraint satisfaction problems with min-max quantifiers. In: ICTAI 2011, pp. 769–776 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lee, J.H.M., Shum, Y.W.: Modeling soft global constraints as linear programs in weighted constraint satisfaction. In: ICTAI 2011, pp. 305–312 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Lee, J.H.M., Leung, K.L.: Consistency techniques for flow-based projection-safe global cost functions in weighted constraint satisfaction. JAIR 43, 257–292 (2012)

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, J.H.M., Leung, K.L., Wu, Y.: Polynomially decomposable global cost functions in weighted constraint satisfaction. In: AAAI 2012 (to appear, 2012)

    Google Scholar 

  20. Mamoulis, N., Stergiou, K.: Algorithms for Quantified Constraint Satisfaction Problems. In: Wallace, M. (ed.) CP 2004. LNCS, vol. 3258, pp. 752–756. Springer, Heidelberg (2004)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  21. Murty, K.G.: Linear and Combinatorial Programming. R. E. Krieger (1985)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Neumann, J.V., Morgenstern, O.: Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. Princeton University Press (1944)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Nisan, N., Roughgarden, T., Tardos, E., Vazirani, V.V.: Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Russell, S.J., Norvig, P.: Artificial Intelligence: A Modern Approach. Pearson Education (2003)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Schaeffer, J., Burch, N., Björnsson, Y., Kishimoto, A., Müller, M., Lake, R., Lu, P., Sutphen, S.: Checkers is solved. Science 317(5844), 1518–1522 (2007)

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Walsh, T.: Stochastic constraint programming. In: ECAI 2002, pp. 111–115 (2002)

    Google Scholar 

  27. Wolsey, L.A.: Integer Programming. Wiley (1998)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2012 Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg

About this paper

Cite this paper

Lallouet, A., Lee, J.H.M., Mak, T.W.K. (2012). Consistencies for Ultra-Weak Solutions in Minimax Weighted CSPs Using the Duality Principle. In: Milano, M. (eds) Principles and Practice of Constraint Programming. CP 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 7514. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33558-7_29

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33558-7_29

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-642-33557-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-642-33558-7

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics