An Annotation Scheme for Social Interaction in Digital Playgrounds

  • Alejandro Moreno
  • Robby van Delden
  • Dennis Reidsma
  • Ronald Poppe
  • Dirk Heylen
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7522)

Abstract

This paper introduces a new annotation scheme, designed specifically to study children’s social interactions during play in digital playgrounds. The scheme is motivated by analyzing relevant literature, combined with observations from recordings of play sessions. The scheme allows us to analyze how key social interactions are related to different stages of play and the physical activity levels associated to them. We can use this information for two goals. First, we can identify relations between social interactions and the impact that changing game dynamics have on their occurrence. Second, it facilitates the analysis of automatic recognition of these social behaviors. Results obtained are useful for both goals. They show that it is possible to identify social interactions and their relation to game dynamics. Finally they also allow for further analysis into the possibility of their automatic recognition.

Keywords

Observation scheme children’s play social interaction digital playground 

References

  1. 1.
    Bakker, S., Markopoulos, P., de Kort, Y.: OPOS: an observation scheme for evaluating head-up play. In: Proceedings of the Nordic Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, NordiCHI 2008, New York, NY, USA, pp. 33–42 (2008)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bandura, A.: Social Learning Theory. Prentice Hall (1977)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bichard, J.P., Waern, A.: Pervasive play, immersion and story: designing interference. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Digital Interactive Media in Entertainment and Arts, DIMEA 2008, New York, NY, USA, pp. 10–17 (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cook, F., Oliver, C.: A review of defining and measuring sociability in children with intellectual disabilities. Research in Developmental Disabilities 32(1), 11–24 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Erikson, E.H.: Childhood and Society. W. W. Norton & Company (1993)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Gibson, J., Hussain, J., Holsgrove, S., Adams, C., Green, J.: Quantifying peer interactions for research and clinical use: the Manchester Inventory for Playground Observation. Research in Developmental Disabilities 32(6), 2458–2466 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guralnick, M.J., Hammond, M.A., Connor, R.T., Neville, B.: Stability, Change, and Correlates of the Peer Relationships of Young Children With Mild Developmental Delays. Child Development 77(2), 312–324 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Hughes, F.: Children, Play, and Development. SAGE (2009)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Huizinga, J.: Homo Ludens: A Study of the Play Element in Culture. Roy Publishers (1950)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Leff, S.S., Costigan, T., Power, T.J.: Using participatory research to develop a playground-based prevention program. Journal of School Psychology 42(1), 3–21 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Loprinzi, P.D., Cardinal, B.J.: Measuring Children’s Physical Activity and Sedentary Behaviors. Journal of Exercise Science & Fitness 9(1), 15–23 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Lund, H.H., Jessen, C., Klitbo, T.: Playware technology for physically activating play. Artificial Life and Robotics 9(4), 165–174 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Morrison, A., Viller, S., Mitchell, P.: Building sensitising terms to understand free-play in open-ended interactive art environments. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI 2011, New York, NY, USA, pp. 2335–2344 (2011)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Rubin, K.H.: The Play Observation Scale (POS). Published by the Center for Children, Relationships, and Culture of the University of Maryland (2001), http://www.rubin-lab.umd.edu/CodingSchemes/
  15. 15.
    Seitinger, S.: An ecological approach to children’s playground props. In: Proceedings of the Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC 2006, New York, NY, USA, pp. 117–120 (2006)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Seitinger, S., Sylvan, E., Zuckerman, O., Popovic, M., Zuckerman, O.: A new playground experience: going digital? In: CHI 2006 on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montréal, Québec, Canada, pp. 303–308 (2006)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sloetjes, H., Wittenburg, P.: Annotation by Category: ELAN and ISO DCR. In: LREC (2008), http://www.lat-mpi.eu/tools/elan/
  18. 18.
    Soler-Adillon, J., Parés, N.: Interactive slide: an interactive playground to promote physical activity and socialization of children. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, CHI EA 2009, New York, NY, USA, pp. 2407–2416 (2009)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Soute, I., Markopoulos, P., Magielse, R.: Head Up Games: combining the best of both worlds by merging traditional and digital play. Personal Ubiquitous Comput. 14(5), 435–444 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tetteroo, D., Reidsma, D., van Dijk Nijholt, A.: Design of an interactive playground based on traditional children’s play. In: Proceedings International Conference on Intelligent Technologies for Interactive Entertainment (INTETAIN 2011), Genoa, Italy (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Vandewater, E.A., Shim, M., Caplovitz, A.G.: Linking obesity and activity level with children’s television and video game use. Journal of Adolescence 27(1), 71–85 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Vygotsky, L.S.: Mind in Society: The Development of Higher Psychological Processes. Harvard University Press (1978)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Wyeth, P., Summerville, J., Adkins, B.: Stomp: an interactive platform for people with intellectual disabilities. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology, ACE 2011, New York, NY, USA (2011)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alejandro Moreno
    • 1
  • Robby van Delden
    • 1
  • Dennis Reidsma
    • 1
  • Ronald Poppe
    • 1
  • Dirk Heylen
    • 1
  1. 1.Human Media InteractionUniversity of TwenteEnschedeThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations