Advertisement

“Do Not Touch the Paintings!” The Benefits of Interactivity on Learning and Future Visits in a Museum

  • Konstantinos Mikalef
  • Michail N. Giannakos
  • Konstantinos Chorianopoulos
  • Letizia Jaccheri
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7522)

Abstract

Educators and museum curators have recognized the value of interactivity, but it remains unclear what is the right level of interactivity in informal learning settings, such as museums. In this study, we explore the effect of increasing levels of interactivity on learning performance and students’ intention for future museum visits. We developed an educational mobile application based on QR codes and quiz software, in order to augment visual arts comprehension during a visit to an art gallery. In addition to the mobile-based version of the game, a paper-based version was also employed followed by a controlled experiment. A total of 60 lyceum students (between 15 and 16 years old) participated in a between-groups evaluation that compared the performance of three levels of interactivity (passive guided tour, paper-based, mobile-based), as well as the perceptions among the groups. The results indicate that the mobile-based student group had higher performance in the post-assessment when compared with the paper-based one. Notably, perceived interest for the game affects students’ perceptions for a future museum visit. Further research should consider the effects of higher-fidelity types of mobile applications, such as 3D graphics, as well as augmented-reality games.

Keywords

Mobile learning informal learning performance perceptions mobile devices museums 

References

  1. 1.
    Berger, C., Carlson, E.: Measuring computer literacy of teacher trainers. Journal of Educational Computing Research 4(9), 289–303 (1988)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cabrera, J.S., Frutos, H.M., Stoica, A.G., Avouris, N., Dimitriadis, Y., Fiotakis, G., Liveri, K.D.: Mystery in the museum: collaborative learning activities using handheld devices. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Human Computer Interaction with Mobile Devices & Services, MobileHCI 2005, pp. 315–318. ACM, New York (2005)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Costabile, M.F., De Angeli, A., Lanzilotti, R., Ardito, C., Buono, P., Pederson, T.: Explore! Possibilities and Challenges of Mobile Learning. In: Proceedings of CHI 2008. ACM Press, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Dunlosky, J., Lipko, A.R.: Metacomprehension: A brief history and how to improve its accuracy. Current Directions in Psychological Science 16, 228–232 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Giannakos, M.N.,, Vlamos, P.: Using Webcasts in Education: Evaluation of its Effectiveness. British Journal of Educational Technology (2012), doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2012.01309.xGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Hsi, H.: A study of user experiences mediated by nomadic web content in a museum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning 19, 308–319 (2003), doi: 10.1046/j.0266-4909.2003.jca_023.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Hsu, C.-L., Lin, J.C.-C.: Acceptance of Blog Usage: The Roles of Technology Acceptance, Social Influence and Knowledge Sharing Motivation. Information and Management 45(1), 65–74 (2008), DOI= http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.im.2007.11.001 MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Huang, Y., Lin, Y., Cheng, S.: Effectiveness of a mobile plant learning system in a science curriculum in Taiwanese elementary education. Computers & Education 54, 47–58 (2010), doi:10.1016/j.compedu.2009.07.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Joshi, K.D., Kvasny, L., McPherson, S., Trauth, E.M., Kulturel-Konak, S., Mahar, J.: Choosing IT as a Career: Exploring the role of Self-Eficacy and Perceived Importance of IT Skills. In: ICIS 2010 Proceedings, Paper 154 (2010), http://aisel.aisnet.org/icis2010_submissions/154
  10. 10.
    King, D.L., Delfabbro, P.H., Griffiths, M.D.: Video game structural characteristics: a new psychological taxonomy. International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction 8, 90–106 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Metcalfe, J., Finn, B.: Evidence that judgments of learning are causally related to study choice. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 15, 174–179 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sung, Y.T., Chang, K.E., Hou, H.T., Chen, P.F.: Designing an electronic guidebook for learning engagement in a museum of history. Computers in Human Behavior 26, 74–83 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tarumi, H., Yamada, K., Daikoku, T., Kusunoki, F., Inagaki, S., Takenaka, M., Hayashi, T., Yano, M.: KEI-time traveler: visiting a past world with mobile phones to enhance learning motivation. In: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Interaction Design and Children, IDC 2008, pp. 161–164. ACM, New York (2008)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • Konstantinos Mikalef
    • 1
  • Michail N. Giannakos
    • 2
  • Konstantinos Chorianopoulos
    • 3
  • Letizia Jaccheri
    • 2
  1. 1.Hellenic Open UniversityPatraGreece
  2. 2.Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
  3. 3.Ionian UniversityCorfuGreece

Personalised recommendations