Advertisement

Similarity in Visual Designs: Effects on Workload and Performance in a Railed-Shooter Game

  • David Milam
  • Magy Seif El-Nasr
  • Lyn Bartram
  • Bardia Aghabeigi
  • Perry Tan
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 7522)

Abstract

Games are a popular form of digital entertainment and one elusive question is how complex visual designs affect the player experience. We address one aspect of this topic in terms of similarity of visual features, explored both as an organizing principle in Gestalt psychology and as a theory in visual attention. To address this issue, we developed a 3D railed shooter game with adjustable visual features of size, speed, and density of targets and non-targets. Based on these features we evaluate 105 player’s performance in 4 visual conditions. In addition, we employ a cognitive workload assessment as a means to understand the perceived demands on players. Results show effects of expertise on performance and cognitive workload, per visual condition. Our methods and implications on game design are discussed.

Keywords

Game Design Visual Design Cognitive Load User Research 

References

  1. 1.
    Ryan, W., Siegel, M.A.: Evaluating Interactive Entertainment using Breakdown: Understanding Embodied Learning in Video Games. Breaking New Ground: Innovation in Games, Play, Practice and Theory. DIGRA, West London (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Smith, R.: Helping Your Players Feel Smart: Puzzles as User Interface. In: Game Developers Conference, San Francisco, CA (2009)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lemarchand, R.: Attention NOT Immersion: Making your games better with psychology and playtesting, the Uncharted Way. In: Game Developers Conference, San Francisco, CA (2012)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Björk, S., Holopainen, J.: Games and Design Patterns. In: Zimmerman, E., Salen, K. (eds.) The Game Design Reader. MIT Press, Cambridge (2006)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Treisman, A.M., Gelade, G.: A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology 12, 97–136 (1980)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Wolf, J.: Guided Search 2.0: A revised model of visual search. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 1, 202–238 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Green, S., Bavelier, D.: Effect of Action Video Games on the Spatial Distribution of Visuospatial Attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 32, 1465–1478 (2006)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Desurvire, H., Wiberg, C.: User Experience Design for Inexperienced Gamers: GAP - Game Approachability Principles. In: Evaluating User Experiences in Games. Springer, London (2010)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Wertheimer, M.: Untersuchen zur lehre von der Gestalt (Laws of Organization in Perceptual Forms). Psychologische Forschung (Psychological Research) 4, 301–350 (1923)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Duncan, J., Humphreys, G.W.: Visual search and stimulus similarity. Psychological Review 96, 433–458 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Seif El-Nasr, M., Vasilakos, T., Rao, C., Joseph, Z.: Dynamic Intelligent Lighting for Directing Visual Attention in Interactive 3D Scenes. IEEE Transactions on Computational Intelligence and AI in Games 1 (2009)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Niedenthal, S.: Complicated Shadows: The Aesthetic Significance of Simulated Illumination in Digital Games (2009)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hoeg, T.: The Invisible Hand: Using Level Design Elements to Manipulate Player Choice (2008)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Milam, D., Seif El-Nasr, M.: Analysis of Level Design “Push & Pull” within 21 games. In: Foundations of Digital Games. ACM, Monterey (2010)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Samarinas, A.: Illuminating Minotaur’s Lair: Light Design and Navigation in Gameworlds (2009)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bartram, L., Ware, C.: Filtering and Brushing with Motion. Information Visualization 1, 66–79 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Lockyer, M., Bartram, L., Riecke, B.: Simple Motion Textures for Ambient Affect. In: Computational Aesthetics. ACM, Vancouver (2011)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kingstone, A., Bischof, W.F.: Perceptual grouping and motion coherence in visual search. Psychological Science 10, 151–156 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Isbister, K., Schaffer, N. (eds.): Game Usability: Advice from the Experts for Advancing the Player Experience. Morgan Kaufmann, San Francisco (2008)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Tullis, T., Albert, B.: Measuring the User Experience: Collecting Analyzing, and Presenting Usability Metrics. Morgan Kaufmann, Burlington (2008)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Pagulayan, R., Keeker, K., Thomas, F., Wixon, D., Romero, R.: User Centered Design in Games. In: Sears, A., Jacko, J. (eds.) Human-Computer Interaction Handbook: Fundamentals, Evolving Technologies, and Emerging Applications. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, New York (2008)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Erfani, M., Seif El-Nasr, M., Riecke, B.E.: The Effect of Previous Gaming Experience on Game Play Performance. Presented at the International Conference on Advances in Computer Entertainment Technology (2010)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    IJsselsteijn, W., Poels, K., de Kort, Y.A.W.: The Game Experience Questionnaire: Development of a self-report measure to assess player experiences of digital games. In: Fun of Gaming (FUGA) Workshop (2008)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Klimmt, C., Hartmann, T.: Effectance, self-efficacy, and the motivation to play video games. In: Vorderer, P., Bryant, J. (eds.) Playing Video Games: Motives, Responses, and Consequences, pp. 132–145. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah (2006)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Milam, D., Seif El-Nasr, M., Bartram, L., Lockyer, M., Feng, C., Tan, P.: Toolset to explore visual motion designs in a video game. In: SIGCHI, Play Experience Workshop, Austin, TX (2012)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Hart, S.G., Staveland, L.E.: Development of NASA-TLX (Task Load Index): Results of empirical and theoretical research. In: Hancock, A., Meshkati, N. (eds.) Human Mental Workload. North Holland Press, Amsterdam (1988)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Boot, W., Blakely, D., Simons, D.J.: Do action video games improve perception and cognition? Frontiers in Psychology 2 (2001)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2012

Authors and Affiliations

  • David Milam
    • 1
  • Magy Seif El-Nasr
    • 2
  • Lyn Bartram
    • 1
  • Bardia Aghabeigi
    • 1
  • Perry Tan
    • 1
  1. 1.School of Interactive Arts + Technology (SIAT)Simon Fraser University SurreySurreyCanada
  2. 2.Colleges of Computer and Information Sciences, Arts, Media and DesignNortheastern UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations